Topical Clonazepam Solution for the Management of Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Retrospective Study.

AIMS: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two concentrations of topical clonazepam solution in improving symptoms of burning mouth syndrome (BMS). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients diagnosed with BMS and managed with topical clonazepam solution between 2008 and 2015. A 0.5-mg/mL solution was prescribed until 2012, when this was changed to a 0.1 mg/mL solution. Patients were instructed to swish with 5 mL for 5 minutes and spit two to four times daily. The efficacies of the two concentrations were compared using patient-reported outcome measures at the first follow-up, including the reported percentage of improvement in burning symptoms and the change in burning severity from baseline ranked on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Response to treatment was compared between the two concentrations using Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: A total of 57 subjects were included, 32 in the 0.1-mg/mL cohort and 25 in the 0.5-mg/mL cohort, and evaluated at a median follow-up of 7 weeks. The median overall percentage improvement was 32.5% in the 0.1-mg/mL cohort and 75% in the 0.5-mg/mL cohort. The median reduction in NRS score was 0.5 points in the 0.1-mg/mL cohort and 6 points in the 0.5-mg/mL cohort. The use of either outcome measure revealed that the response to treatment with the 0.5-mg/mL solution was superior to that of the 0.1 mg/mL solution (P < .01). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a 0.5-mg/mL topical clonazepam solution is effective in the management of BMS. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Safety and tolerability of topical clonazepam solution for management of oral dysesthesia.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the absolute and relative safety of treatment with 2 concentrations of topical clonazepam solution (0.1 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL) for management of oral dysesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: The study was a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with oral dysesthesia and managed with topical clonazepam solution (swish and spit) between 2008 and 2015. The relative safety of the 2 concentrations was evaluated in terms of occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and occurrence of change to treatment plan secondary to ADRs. RESULTS: For the study, 162 patients were included-84 patients in the 0.1 mg/mL cohort and 78 in the 0.5 mg/mL cohort, who were evaluated for a median follow-up period of 6 weeks. Thirty-eight (23%) patients developed ADRs. The most frequently reported ADR was sedation (62% of ADRs), followed by altered mental status and dizziness (7% each). Dose adjustments were required in 9 patients (6%) and treatment discontinuation in 13 (8%). ADRs were more frequently reported in the 0.5 mg/mL cohort, but no significant difference was found in terms of occurrence of ADRs, change to treatment plan secondary to ADRs, or types of ADRs (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with topical clonazepam solution in either 0.5 mg/mL or 0.1 mg/mL concentration appears to be safe and well-tolerated. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.