Intraoperative blood pressure changes during cemented versus uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture: a multi-center cohort study : The effect of bone cement for bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with uncemented about the change of intraoperative blood pressure and the incidence of major complications in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multiple center prospective cohort study included only patients with acute displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden stage III or IV). All patients were treated with cemented or uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty using modified Hardinge or Watson-Jones approach in the lateral decubitus position. Baseline data, medical history, type of anesthesia, FiO2 value, the number of vasopressor using during operation, femoral component, intraoperative blood pressure, SaO2, and major complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 164 patients (45 males and 119 females), 86 underwent cemented and 78 underwent uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Baseline medical histories were similar in both groups. In both the cemented and uncemented groups, intraoperative systolic blood pressure significantly decreased during cementing or rasping (106.3 and 103.6 mmHg) and after femoral component insertion (103.3 and 99.1 mmHg) compared to before rasping (120.7 and 116.4 mmHg) (p < 0.0001, respectively). Donaldson's grade seemed more favorable in uncemented group than in cemented group during cementing or rasping, during stem insertion; however, no patients experienced the lethal complication in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative blood pressure did not change during cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthrplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture. If the standard modern cement technique was performed during operation, bone cement is a safe and acceptable for elderly patients who have a lot of medical histories.

The influence of bone cement and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class on cardiovascular status during bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral-neck fracture: A multicenter, prospective, case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how bone cement and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification influence the cardiovascular system in elderly patients with femoral-neck fractures treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty. Therefore, we performed a case-control study to investigate these questions and compared the following:≥ASA III with≤ASA II patients who underwent cemented hemiarthroplasty; and cemented with cementless hemiarthroplasty in≥ASA III patients. HYPOTHESIS: ASA classification influences the cardiovascular system during cemented hemiarthroplasty and bone cement influences intraoperative blood pressure [IBP] in patients rated≥ASA III. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, prospective study included patients with acute displaced femoral-neck fractures. Baseline data, medical history, anesthesia, FiO2, vasopressor use, femoral component, IBP, SpO2, and complications were evaluated. Of 200 patients, 100 were cemented (mean age, 77±10 years), and 100 were cementless (mean age, 78±9 years). Cemented hemiarthroplasty employed a third-generation technique (plugging, irrigating, drying and filling the canal with cement under pressurization). RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased significantly during cementing, versus pre-rasping in≤ASA II patients (from 117.9±24.5 [range, 65-199] to 106.9±20.3 [range, 59-172]; p=0.007), in≥ASA III patients (from 129.5±21.0 [range, 90-169] to 110.4±17.9 [range, 79-157]; p=0.006), and post-stem-insertion, versus pre-rasping in≤ASA II patients (from 117.9±24.5 [range, 65-199] to 103.9±20.7 [range, 53-178]; p=0.0004), and in≥ASA III patients (from 129.5±21.0 [range, 90-169] to 111.2±24.6 [range, 70-156]; p=0.009). In≥ASA III patients, SBP decreased significantly during cementing or rasping, versus pre-rasping in cemented patients (from 129.5±21.0 [range, 90-169] to 110.4±17.9 [range, 79-157]; p=0.006), in cementless patients (from 115.0±17.7 [range, 85-150] to 100.7±15.7 [range, 75-142]; p=0.004), and post-stem-insertion, versus pre-rasping in cemented patients (from 129.5±21.0 [range, 90-169] to 111.2±SD [range]; p=0.009), and in cementless patients (from 115.0±17.7 [range, 85-150] to 89.4±17.5 [range, 58-140]; p<0.0001). There were no lethal complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicate a similar hemodynamic change intraoperatively between≤ASA II patients and≥ASA III patients in the cemented group, and between patients with cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty in the≥ASA III patients. With modern hemiarthroplasty techniques, bone cement might be as safe as cementless techniques in elderly,≥ASA III patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, multicenter case-control cohort study.

Assessment of gait in a rat model of myofascial inflammation using the CatWalk system.

STUDY DESIGN: Gait analysis and immunohistological analysis in a rat model of myofascial inflammation in low back. OBJECTIVE: To investigate gait in a rat model of myofascial inflammation using the CatWalk gait analysis system. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are few reports examining low back pain behavior in animal models. The CatWalk is a computer-assisted gait analysis system that provides an automated way to assess gait function and this behavior during pain. METHODS: In a myofascial inflammation group, 0.5 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde buffer and 0.5 mL of 5% Fluoro-Gold (FG) buffer were injected into bilateral multifidus muscles of rats. In a control group, FG buffer alone was injected. Five days after surgery, the gait of rats in both groups was investigated using the CatWalk system. In the present study a total of 36 gait parameters were quantified and used to judge pain-related behavior. Bilateral dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) from L1 to L6 levels were resected, and immunostained for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). RESULTS: In the myofascial inflammation group, the mean duty cycle (duration of paw contact divided by time between consecutive paw contacts) of each paws (front and hind) were significantly higher and mean stride length (the distance between successive placements of the same paw) of each paws were significantly shorter compared with the control group. Furthermore, mean minimum contact intensity of the complete paw and mean contact intensity of each paws in the myofascial inflammation group were significantly higher compared with the control group. The proportion of CGRP-immunoreactive FG-labeled neurons among all FG-labeled DRG neurons in the myofascial inflammation group was significantly higher than the proportion in the control group. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that myofascial inflammation in low back caused the changes to the rat's gait, including long stands, short stride, and strong paw contact.