Comparative effectiveness of medicinal interventions for oral submucous fibrosis: A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This network meta-analysis presents an exhaustive description and comparison of the available medical interventions for the management of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted after registration with PROSPERO. (PROSPERO ID CRD42022303441). Databases (PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, and others) were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCT) trials from inception till September 2022 for the medical interventions in OSMF. The primary outcome was the improvement in mouth opening. The secondary outcomes were improvement in burning sensation, tongue protrusion, and cheek flexibility. The interventions were ranked according to their efficacy based on the surface under the cumulative ranking. RESULTS: 47 studies including 2393 patients were assessed for quantitative analysis. For mouth opening, the combined treatment with steroid, hyaluronidase, and antioxidant was most effective [MD, 7.05 (95%CI 1.76,12.34)], followed by the combination of oral antioxidants with injectable steroids, [MD, 3.80 (95%CI -0.44,8.03)]. Additionally, the combined treatment with steroid, hyaluronidase, and antioxidant was most effective in reducing the burning sensation [MD, -8.62(-10.95,-6.30)], followed by aloe vera [MD, -8.45(-10.40,-6.49)] and pentoxifylline [MD -7.57(-9.46,-5.68)]. For tongue protrusion, curcumin was most effective followed by antioxidants. Most of the drugs used were reported to cause negligible or mild adverse effects. CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis reported the efficacy of medicinal interventions in OSMF patients compared to the placebo in the improvement of mouth opening and burning sensation, and cheek flexibility. The methodological quality of included RCTs was low. Well-designed studies are recommended to obtain strong evidence.

Colchicine in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and GRADE-Based Assessment of Certainty of Evidence.

Purpose: To study the efficacy of Colchicine in the management of Oral Sub mucous Fibrosis (OSMF) through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods:An extensive literature search was conducted on databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library database, LILACS, Google Scholar, CTRI, and Google search engine. The search comprises all articles published from 2013 to 2022. A total of 10 randomized control trial studies involving colchicine as one of the interventions were included. [CRD42022377674] Results:10 randomized control comprising 456 subjects were included. 3 studies are included in the meta-analysis comprising 90 subjects. All three studies show that there are significant differences between colchicine and other intervention regarding mouth opening and burning sensation. It indicates that Colchicine is significantly more effective in the reduction of burning sensation than other interventions used as a control in OSMF. Conclusion: The evidence generated through this systemic review and meta-analysis suggest that the use of an oral form of colchicine is an effective measure in the management of OSMF, especially the subjective symptom such as burning sensation where as it is not found to be much effective in case of mouth opening. If colchicine is used as co drug along with conventional injection therapy better will the result. However there is marked diversity among the studies reviewed; therefore, the results of this review should be interpreted very carefully.

Oral Health Status, Health Behaviour and Treatment Needs of Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the oral health status and treatment needs of cardiovascular surgery patients. Second, the awareness of cardiovascular surgery patients regarding the association between oral health and heart disease was considered. METHODS: Assessment of oral health status, oral hygiene practices and treatment needs of 106 hospitalized patients in preparation for cardiovascular surgery. Patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire designed for this study and oral examination was carried out by a dentist. RESULTS: The oral hygiene practices of the study cohort were not up to the standard. Patients' awareness of infective endocarditis was poor. Approximately 68% patients experienced dental caries as decayed teeth or missing teeth due to caries and filled teeth. The mean plaque index in the study group was 1.25. In this study cohort, the mean probing depth of periodontal pockets was 5.7±1.3, whereas the mean number of teeth with periodontal pockets > 6 mm was 0.5±0.9. A total of 84 (74.2%) of the patients required dental treatment. CONCLUSION: The principal finding in this study was that patients with heart disease had poor oral health. This study also highlights the importance of better interaction among all healthcare professionals to integrate oral health as part of comprehensive inpatient healthcare.

Oral health status, health behaviour and treatment needs of patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery

Abstract Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the oral health status and treatment needs of cardiovascular surgery patients. Second, the awareness of cardiovascular surgery patients regarding the association between oral health and heart disease was considered. Methods: Assessment of oral health status, oral hygiene practices and treatment needs of 106 hospitalized patients in preparation for cardiovascular surgery. Patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire designed for this study and oral examination was carried out by a dentist. Results: The oral hygiene practices of the study cohort were not up to the standard. Patients' awareness of infective endocarditis was poor. Approximately 68% patients experienced dental caries as decayed teeth or missing teeth due to caries and filled teeth. The mean plaque index in the study group was 1.25. In this study cohort, the mean probing depth of periodontal pockets was 5.7±1.3, whereas the mean number of teeth with periodontal pockets > 6 mm was 0.5±0.9. A total of 84 (74.2%) of the patients required dental treatment. Conclusion: The principal finding in this study was that patients with heart disease had poor oral health. This study also highlights the importance of better interaction among all healthcare professionals to integrate oral health as part of comprehensive inpatient healthcare.