John N. Insall Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Components: Durable and Reliable at a Mean 10-Years Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Cementless fixation is gaining popularity for primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The prior 5-year results of our randomized clinical trial that included 3 different tibial designs found minimal differences. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the 10-year results in the same cohort. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, 389 primary TKAs were randomized: traditional modular cemented tibia (135); hybrid (cemented baseplate with uncemented pegs) monoblock tibia (128); and cementless monoblock tibia (126). Implant survivorships, radiographs, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Mean age at TKA was 68 years (range, 41 to 85), 46% were male, and mean body mass index was 32 (range, 21 to 59). The mean follow-up was 10 years. RESULTS: The 10-year survivorship free of any revision was similar between the hybrid monoblock and cementless monoblock groups at 96%, but lower (89%) for the traditional modular cemented tibia (P = .05). The traditional modular cemented tibia group had significantly more revisions for aseptic tibial loosening than the other 2 groups (7 versus 0%) at 10 years (P = .003). The traditional modular cemented tibia group had significantly more nonprogressive radiolucent lines than the hybrid and cementless monoblock groups (24, 12, and 9%, respectively). Clinical outcomes were similar and excellent between all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Cementless and hybrid monoblock tibial components have excellent implant survivorship (96%) with no cases of aseptic tibial loosening to date. The traditional cemented modular tibial group had a 7% cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening at 10 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

Two-Stage Exchange and Marlex-Mesh Reconstruction for Infection with Extensor Mechanism Disruption After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee with concurrent disruption of the extensor mechanism is a devastating complication. Historically, knees with such complications have been salvaged with use of an arthrodesis or amputation. The purpose of this study was to assess the survival and functional outcomes of a 2-stage exchange arthroplasty combined with knitted monofilament polypropylene (Marlex; C.R. Bard) mesh reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. METHODS: From 2000 to 2015, 16 patients underwent a 2-stage exchange arthroplasty and Marlex-mesh reconstruction for PJI with an extensor mechanism disruption. The study included 9 male patients and 7 female patients with a mean age at the time of reimplantation and mesh reconstruction of 64 years. The mean follow-up was 4 years. PJI was diagnosed on the basis of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Clinical outcomes, including survivorship, Knee Society Score (KSS) results, and complications, were assessed. RESULTS: Of 16 reconstructions, 13 were in place at the time of the latest follow-up. At 2 years, survivorship free of mesh failure was 86%, survivorship free of PJI was 87%, and survivorship free of PJI or mesh failure was 75%. The mean KSS improved from 48 prior to resection to 74 after mesh reconstruction and reimplantation. The mean extensor lag improved from 31° prior to resection to 3° after mesh reconstruction. Two patients required mesh revision, 1 patient required an above-the-knee amputation for complex wound complications related to reinfection, 1 patient developed a reinfection requiring irrigation and debridement, and 1 patient developed a superficial infection that required debridement. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty combined with Marlex-mesh reconstruction of the extensor mechanism is a viable alternative to knee arthrodesis or amputation. At 2 years, 75% of mesh reconstructions were in place and without evidence of PJI. Moreover, the functional outcomes were improved, with a negligible extensor lag. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A comparison of facial protection and the incidence of head, neck, and facial injuries in Junior A hockey players. A function of individual playing time.

A cohort of 282 elite amateur ice hockey players were analyzed to 1) record the number, type, location, and severity of head, neck, and facial injuries sustained during games; 2) examine the relationship between injuries and the type of facial protection (none, partial, or full) according to individual playing time; and 3) determine whether full or partial facial protection is associated with an increased incidence of concussions, eye injuries, and neck injuries. Fifty-two injuries (158.9 per 1000 player-game hours) occurred in players wearing no facial protection, 45 (73.5 per 1000 player-game hours) in players wearing partial facial protection (half shield), and 16 (23.2 per 1000 player-game hours) in players wearing full facial protection (full cage or shield). Players wearing no protection were injured at a rate more than twice that of players wearing partial protection and almost seven times higher than those wearing full protection. Concussions occurred in four players wearing no protection, five players wearing partial protection, and two players wearing full protection; these differences were not significant. The risk of eye injury was 4.7 times greater for players wearing no protection compared with those wearing partial protection. No eye or neck injuries occurred in players wearing full protection. This study demonstrates that both full and partial facial protection significantly reduce injuries to the eye and face without increasing neck injuries and concussions.

Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical comparison of 5 atlantoaxial posterior arthrodesis techniques. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative value of different posterior wire constructs when one or two transarticular screws are used. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A combination of Gallie or Brooks techniques and 2 posterior transarticular screws has been shown to be effective for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. Anatomic constraints may preclude the insertion of a transarticular screw unilaterally or bilaterally. METHODS: Ten adult human cadaveric upper cervical spine specimens were used. The specimens were tested intact, after odontoidectomy and transverse and capsular ligament section and after stabilization with each of the 5 techniques: Brooks-Jenkins cable fixation, Brooks-Jenkins with unilateral transarticular screw, Gallie posterior wire construct with unilateral transarticular screw, Brooks-Jenkins with bilateral screws, and Gallie with bilateral screws. Pure moments were applied in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and torsion within physiologic limits (<1.5 Nm). RESULTS: In flexion-extension and lateral bending, the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) increased significantly after the specimens were injured as compared with intact spines (P < 0.001). After stabilization, the ROM and NZ were significantly lower than in injured and intact spines in all motions (P < 0.01) except lateral bending in the intact spine. Among the 5 instrumented techniques, the ROM for the Gallie construct with 1 screw was significantly higher than for the Brooks-Jenkins construct with 1 or 2 screws in flexion-extension (P < 0.05). In axial torsion, the Gallie construct with 1 screw displayed a larger NZ and ROM than any of the other 4 constructs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gallie or Brooks-Jenkins cable fixation alone may not be adequate for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. If 2 supplemented transarticular screws can beinserted, there is no difference between the Gallie or Brooks techniques. If only a single screw can be inserted, the Brooks-Jenkins technique is recommended rather than a Gallie technique.