Oral combination therapy with a nucleoside polymerase inhibitor (RG7128) and danoprevir for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection (INFORM-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: Present interferon-based standard of care treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is limited by both efficacy and tolerability. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of an all-oral combination treatment with two experimental anti-HCV drugs-RG7128, a nucleoside polymerase inhibitor; and danoprevir, an NS3/4A protease inhibitor-in patients with chronic HCV infection. METHODS: Patients from six centres in New Zealand and Australia who were chronically infected with HCV genotype 1 received up to 13 days oral combination treatment with RG7128 (500 mg or 1000 mg twice daily) and danoprevir (100 mg or 200 mg every 8 h or 600 mg or 900 mg twice daily) or placebo. Eligible patients were sequentially enrolled into one of seven treatment cohorts and were randomly assigned by interactive voice or web response system to either active treatment or placebo. Patients were separately randomly assigned within each cohort with a block size that reflected the number of patients in the cohort and the ratio of treatment to placebo. The random allocation schedule was computer generated. Dose escalation was started in HCV treatment-naive patients; standard of care treatment-experienced patients, including previous null responders, were enrolled in higher-dose danoprevir cohorts. Investigators, personnel at the study centre, and patients were masked to treatment allocation. However, the pharmacist who prepared the doses, personnel involved in pharmacokinetic sample analyses, statisticians who prepared data summaries, and the clinical pharmacologists who reviewed the data before deciding to initiate dosing in the next cohort were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was change in HCV RNA concentration from baseline to day 14 in patients who received 13 days of combination treatment. All patients who completed treatment with the study drugs were included in the analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00801255. FINDINGS: 88 patients were randomly assigned to a study drug treatment regimen (n=74 over seven treatment groups; 73 received at least one dose of study drug) or to placebo (n=14, all of whom received at least one dose). The median change in HCV RNA concentration from baseline to day 14 ranged from -3·7 to -5·2 log(10) IU/mL in the cohorts that received 13 days of combination treatment. At the highest combination doses tested (1000 mg RG7128 and 900 mg danoprevir twice daily), the median change in HCV RNA concentration from baseline to day 14 was -5·1 log(10) IU/mL (IQR -5·6 to -4·7) in treatment-naive patients and -4·9 log(10) IU/mL in previous standard of care null responders (-5·2 to -4·5) compared with an increase of 0·1 log(10) IU/mL in the placebo group. The combination of RG7128 and danoprevir was well tolerated with no treatment-related serious or severe adverse events, no grade 3 or 4 changes in laboratory parameters, and no safety-related treatment discontinuations. INTERPRETATION: This oral combination of a nucleoside analogue polymerase inhibitor and protease inhibitor holds promise as an interferon-free treatment for chronic HCV. FUNDING: Roche Palo Alto.

A randomised trial to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and antiviral effects of peginterferon alfa-2b and peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C (COMPARE).

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antiviral activity of peginterferon alfa-2b and peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were randomised to peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week) or peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg/week) for 4 weeks, then in combination with ribavirin (13 mg/kg/day) for a further 4 weeks. The pharmacokinetic profile of both peginterferons, mRNA expression of a selected group of interferon-induced gene transcripts, and serum HCV-RNA levels were assessed. RESULTS: Patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2b had significantly greater up-regulation of interferon-alfa response genes compared with those receiving peginterferon alfa-2a. Correspondingly, patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2b also had a significantly greater log10 maximum and log10 time-weighted average decrease in serum HCV-RNA. A greater proportion of peginterferon alfa-2b patients achieved a > or = 2.0 log10 reduction in serum HCV-RNA levels by week 8 (72% vs 44% of peginterferon alfa-2a patients, P = 0.09). There was an approximately 16-fold greater exposure to peginterferon in the serum of patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the biological activity, measured by early interferon-induced gene transcripts and early antiviral responsiveness, may have been greater in patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2b despite their lower exposure to the drug compared with patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a.

Optimal dosing frequency of pegylated interferon alfa-2b monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-IFN-alfa 2b ) has been shown to provide superior efficacy to IFN-alfa 2b in patients with chronic hepatitis C (predominantly genotype 1) infection as measured by viral clearance. This study was conducted to determine the optimal dosing regimen of PEG-IFN-alfa 2b required to obtain a maximum decrease of hepatitis C viral RNA. METHODS: This was a 24-week, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, active-controlled trial in the United Kingdom, France, and Israel. Individuals (n = 61) with chronic hepatitis C infection, genotype 1, received IFN-alfa 2b 3 mIU 3 times weekly for 24 weeks, or PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 or 3.0 microg/kg/wk, as total weekly full or split doses, for 12 weeks. At week 12, serum RNA titer was measured, and all PEG-IFN-alfa 2b patients continued with 1.5 microg/kg/wk for a further 12 weeks. RESULTS: Mean serum hepatitis C RNA levels decreased in all groups at weeks 12 and 24. PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 microg/kg/wk was superior to IFN-alfa 2b in decreasing mean serum hepatitis C RNA ( P < .05 at week 12). The efficacy of split-dose PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 or 3.0 microg/kg/wk regimens was not significantly different from full-dose PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 microg/kg/wk. However, there was a significant decrease in neutrophil count in groups receiving PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 3.0 microg/kg/wk or lower, multiple-dose per week regimens. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 microg/kg once weekly is the optimal dosing frequency for patients with chronic hepatitis C with predominantly genotype 1 infection. More frequent dosing or increasing the dose to 3.0 microg/kg/wk did not result in improved antiviral effects, but did decrease neutrophil counts.

Treating cancer with PEG Intron: pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon-alpha-2b formulation.

BACKGROUND: PEG Intron (pegylated interferon-alpha-2b [IFN-alpha-2b]; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) has demonstrated delayed clearance and increased area under the curve compared with native IFN-alpha-2b. Studies in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and malignancies have demonstrated both biologic and clinical activity of PEG Intron and have provided empiric data to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of PEG Intron and IFN-alpha-2b. METHODS: The authors conducted a review of the available data comparing the PK and pharmacodynamic effects of PEG Intron and IFN-alpha-2b. Safety and efficacy data from Phase I/II studies of PEG Intron in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and solid tumors were also reviewed. RESULTS: Data from patients with chronic hepatitis C infection suggest that exposure to IFN at a PEG Intron dose of 0.25 microg/kg per week is similar to that observed after administration of IFN-alpha-2b at a dose of 3 million International Units, three times per week. PEG Intron at doses up to 6 microg/kg per week was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in patients with CML and solid tumors, including metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Dose intensification can be achieved safely in patients with CML and solid tumors using PEG Intron, which could improve efficacy. These results provide useful dosing guidelines to clinicians investigating the antitumor activity of PEG Intron in patients with malignancies. More data are needed to determine the optimal dose in various oncologic indications. However, these results provide a sound rationale for further investigation of PEG Intron.