A pilot study to evaluate a tissue-engineered bilayered cell therapy as an alternative to tissue from the palate.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a tissue-engineered skin product composed of viable neonatal keratinocytes and fibroblasts and compared it to a free gingival graft (FGG) in a procedure to enhance keratinized tissue (KT) and wound healing around teeth that do not require root coverage. METHODS: Twenty-five subjects were enrolled who had at least two non-adjacent teeth in contralateral quadrants exhibiting an insufficient zone of attached gingiva requiring soft tissue grafting where root coverage was not desired. One tooth was randomized to receive an FGG, and the other was randomized to receive bilayered cell therapy (BCT). The amount of KT was measured at baseline and 3 and 6 months, and the texture and color of the grafted tissue were compared to the surrounding tissue at months 1, 3, and 6. A questionnaire was used to determine subject preference at 6 months. Biopsies and persistence studies were performed on a subset of the subjects. RESULTS: The FGG generated statistically significantly (P <0.001) more KT than the test device (BCT) (4.5 +/- 0.80 mm versus 2.4 +/- 1.02 mm); no significant difference in recession or clinical attachment level was detected between treatment groups (P = 0.212 and P = 0.448, respectively); and no significant differences were detected at any time point for bleeding on probing (BOP), resistance to muscle pull, or inflammation. The BCT group had significantly better color and texture match with surrounding tissue (P <0.001), and subject preference was significantly greater for the BCT group (P = 0.041). No device-related adverse events or safety issues occurred during the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The tissue-engineered graft BCT was safe and capable of generating de novo KT without the morbidity and potential clinical difficulties associated with donor-site surgery. The amount of KT generated with FGG was greater than generated with BCT; however, 24 of 25 test sites demonstrated an increase in KT at 6 months, with more than three-quarters of the sites yielding > or =2 mm bands of KT.

New composite endpoints to assess efficacy in periodontal therapy clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Clinical attachment level (CAL) and bone height (radiographic or clinical) are two well-accepted endpoint measures for periodontal clinical trials; however, neither one has been shown to be more predictive of long-term success than the other. We propose using a composite endpoint analysis combining clinical and radiological parameters to assess the beneficial effects on both hard and soft tissues following periodontal therapy using a single statistical test. To address this need, two composite endpoint alternatives are offered as a yardstick for clinical success; each includes the improvement in CAL and either improvement in linear bone growth or percent bone fill. METHODS: The data for composite endpoint analyses were derived from a clinical trial evaluating two concentrations of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) with beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) compared to beta-TCP plus buffer as follows: group I, beta-TCP + 0.3 mg/ml rhPDGF-BB; group II, beta-TCP + 1.0 mg/ml rhPDGF-BB; and group III, beta-TCP + buffer. The construction of composite endpoints was based on the greatest values for change, accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for clinical attachment level (DeltaCAL), mean change in radiographic linear bone gain (LBG), and mean radiographic percent bone fill (%BF), with the following dual standards defining a successful clinical result: CAL gain > or =2.67 mm and radiographic LBG > or =1.1 mm at 6 months and CAL gain > or =2.67 mm and radiographic %BF > or =14.1% at 6 months. RESULTS: Group I (beta-TCP + 0.3 mg/ml rhPDGF-BB) demonstrated statistically significant differences from group III (active control) for both composite endpoints. For the CAL/LBG composite endpoint, 61.7% of sites in group I versus 30.4% of sites in group III met the composite endpoint benchmarks (P <0.001). For the CAL/%BF composite endpoint, 70% of sites in group I versus 44.6% of sites in group III met the composite endpoint benchmarks (P = 0.003). A non-significant trend was observed for group II versus group III with 37.9% (P = 0.20) and 55.2% (P = 0.13) of sites meeting the CAL/LBG and CAL/%BF composite endpoints, respectively. These results are further emphasized by findings demonstrating a low correlation between the individual efficacy endpoints (DeltaCAL and %BF; DeltaCAL and LBG) for each of the three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Composite endpoints are advantageous in periodontal clinical trials where no single efficacy endpoint has been established as the most important. A composite endpoint, combining outcome measures of both hard and soft tissue components of the periodontium, may be preferable for assessing efficacy of periodontal regenerative therapies. Two composite endpoints are offered to meet this need.

Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates bone fill and rate of attachment level gain: results of a large multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Growth factors are generally accepted to be essential mediators of tissue repair via well-established mechanisms of action that include stimulatory effects on angiogenesis and cellular proliferation, ingrowth, differentiation, and matrix biosynthesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate in a large-scale, prospective, blinded, and randomized controlled clinical trial the safety and effectiveness of purified recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF-BB) mixed with a synthetic beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) matrix for the treatment of advanced periodontal osseous defects at 6 months of healing. METHODS: Eleven clinical centers enrolled 180 subjects, each requiring surgical treatment of a 4 mm or greater intrabony periodontal defect and meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were randomized into one of three treatment groups: 1) beta-TCP + 0.3 mg/ml rhPDGF-BB in buffer; 2) beta-TCP + 1.0 mg/ml rhPDGF-BB in buffer; and 3) beta-TCP + buffer (active control). Safety data were assessed by the frequency and severity of adverse events. Effectiveness measurements included clinical attachment levels (CAL) and gingival recession (GR) measured clinically and linear bone growth (LBG) and percent bone fill (% BF) as assessed radiographically by an independent centralized radiology review center. The area under the curve (AUC), an assessment of the rate of healing, was also calculated for CAL measurements. The surgeons, clinical and radiographic evaluators, patients, and study sponsor were all masked with respect to treatment groups. RESULTS: CAL gain was significantly greater at 3 months for group 1 (rhPDGF 0.3 mg/ml) compared to group 3 (beta-TCP + buffer) (3.8 versus 3.3 mm; P = 0.032), although by 6 months, this finding was not statistically significant (P = 0.11). This early acceleration of CAL gain led to group 1 exhibiting a significantly greater rate of CAL gain between baseline and 6 months than group 3 as assessed by the AUC (68.4- versus 60.1-mm weeks; P = 0.033). rhPDGF (0.3 mg/ml)-treated sites also had significantly greater linear bone gain (2.6 versus 0.9 mm, respectively; P < 0.001) and percent defect fill (57% versus 18%, respectively; P < 0.001) than the sites receiving the bone substitute with buffer at 6 months. There was less GR at 3 months in group 1 compared to group 3 (P = 0.04); at 6 months, GR for group 1 remained unchanged, whereas there was a slight gain in gingival height for group 3 resulting in comparable GR. There were no serious adverse events attributable to any of the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the largest prospective, randomized, triple-blinded, and controlled pivotal clinical trial reported to date assessing a putative periodontal regenerative and wound healing therapy. The study demonstrated that the use of rhPDGF-BB was safe and effective in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Treatment with rhPDGF-BB stimulated a significant increase in the rate of CAL gain, reduced gingival recession at 3 months post-surgery, and improved bone fill as compared to a beta-TCP bone substitute at 6 months.