Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Hepatology ; 51(4): 1122-6, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20069649

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: A sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin is defined as undetectable serum HCV-RNA at 24 weeks (W+24) posttreatment follow-up. Viral load outcome in patients with virological relapse (VR) has not been explored. This study evaluated whether the assessment of serum HCV-RNA 12 weeks (W+12) after the end of treatment was as relevant as W+24 to evaluate SVR in 573 patients who received combination PEG-IFN and ribavirin and had a virological response at the end of treatment. Serum HCV-RNA was measured, using a new assay based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) with a lowest detection limit of 5-10 IU/mL, at W+12 and W+24 after the end of treatment. VR was defined as reappearance of detectable HCV-RNA at W+24 posttreatment follow-up. The positive predictive value (PPV) of undetectable serum HCV-RNA at W+12 was evaluated to identify patients with SVR, and the viral load outcome was measured in relapse patients. At the W+24 posttreatment follow-up, 408 (71%) patients had an SVR, 181 (71.2%) were treated with PEG-IFNalpha-2a and ribavirin, and 227 (71.1%) were treated with PEG-IFNalpha-2b and ribavirin. At W+12, serum HCV-RNA was undetectable in 409 patients, and 408 patients were SVR (PPV 99.7%, 95% confidence interval 99.1-100). In relapse patients, serum HCV-RNA levels were 5.623 +/- 0.748, 4.979 +/- 0.870, and 5.216 +/- 0.758 log(10) IU/mL at baseline, W+12, and W+24, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the assessment of serum HCV-RNA 12 weeks after the end of treatment, using the highly sensitive TMA assay (PPV 99.7%), is as relevant as after 24 weeks to predict SVR and make decisions on the management of treated patients, suggesting a new definition for SVR.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Viral/sangue , Proteínas Recombinantes , Recidiva
2.
J Clin Virol ; 46(3): 216-21, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19748822

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early viral monitoring is essential for the management of treatment outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A variety of commercially available assays are now available to quantify HCV-RNA in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: Compare the clinical results of 3 commercially available assays to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of rapid virological response (RVR) at week 4 and early virological response (EVR) at week 12. STUDY DESIGN: 287 patients treated with standard care regimen combination therapy were studied. HCV-RNA values measured at baseline, week 4, week 12 with VERSANT HCV 3.0 Assay (bDNA), and VERSANT HCV-RNA Qualitative Assay (TMA) (bDNA/TMA); COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS/TaqMan (CAP/CTM) and Abbott m2000sp extraction/m2000rt amplification system (ART). RVR was defined as undetectable serum HCV-RNA and EVR as a > OR =2 log decline in baseline viral load (BLV). RESULTS: Median (range) BVLs were: 5.585(2.585-6.816), 5.189(2.792-7.747) and 4.804(2.380-6.580) log(10)IU/ml, with bDNA/TMA, CAP/CTM and ART, respectively (p<0.01); RVR was observed in 22%, 30% and 27% of the patients and PPVs were 97%, 91% and 94% with bDNA/TMA, CAP/CTM and ART, respectively (p=0.317). EVR was observed in 76%, 73% and 67% of the patients and NPVs were 93%, 83% and 79% with bDNA/TMA, CAP/CTM and ART, respectively (p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment monitoring should include both detection of serum HCV-RNA at week 4 to predict SVR and at week 12 to predict non-SVR. The value of all 3 assays was similar for evaluating RVR or EVR. Because of viral load discrepancies the same assay should be used throughout patient treatment follow-up.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Ensaio de Amplificação de Sinal de DNA Ramificado/métodos , Hepatite C Crônica/diagnóstico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Adulto , Algoritmos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , RNA Viral/sangue , Proteínas Recombinantes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Viral
3.
Antivir Ther ; 14(8): 1183-8, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20032548

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes on serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) kinetics in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients treated with pegylated interferon-alpha2a (PEG-IFN-alpha2a). METHODS: A total of 48 consecutive patients treated with PEG-IFN-alpha2a (180 microg/week) for 48 weeks were assessed. HBV genotype was determined. Serum HBV DNA and HBsAg were assessed at baseline, during treatment (weeks 12, 24 and 48) and during follow-up (weeks 72 and 96). RESULTS: The distribution of HBV genotype was A 27%, B 17%, C 12%, D 29% and E 14%. Mean +/-sd pretreatment serum HBV DNA (6.9 +/-1.5 log(10) copies/ml) was not different between genotypes and decreased under treatment in all genotypes without significant difference. Mean +/-sd pretreatment serum HBsAg (3.6 +/-0.6 log(10) IU/ml) was significantly different between genotypes (P<0.001), with high levels in genotypes A and C, intermediate levels in genotypes D and E, and low levels in genotype B (4.0 +/-0.3, 4.1 +/-0.7, 3.6 +/-0.5, 3.6 +/-0.4 and 2.7 +/-0.6 log(10) IU/ml, respectively). Serum HBsAg decreased under treatment in all genotypes with a significant difference. At the end of treatment, mean +/-sd decrease was high in genotype A, intermediate in genotypes B and D, and low in genotypes C and E (1.3 +/-1.6, 0.7 +/-0.7, 0.6 +/-0.9, 0.4 +/-1.0 and 0.4 +/-0.9 log(10) IU/ml, respectively; P<0.001). During follow-up, serum HBsAg continued to decrease in genotypes A and D, whereas rebound was observed in genotypes B, C and E. CONCLUSIONS: HBV genotype has a strong influence on serum HBsAg kinetics during PEG-IFN-alpha2a therapy in HBeAg-negative patients.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/sangue , Vírus da Hepatite B/classificação , Vírus da Hepatite B/genética , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , DNA Viral/sangue , Feminino , Genótipo , Antígenos E da Hepatite B/sangue , Vírus da Hepatite B/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepatite B Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Cinética , Masculino , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA