Fluorescent iodized emulsion for pre- and intraoperative sentinel lymph node imaging: validation in a preclinical model.

PURPOSE: To validate the usefulness of a newly developed tracer for preoperative gastric sentinel lymph node (LN) (SLN) mapping and intraoperative navigation after a single preoperative submucosal injection in rat and beagle models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the Experimental Animal Ethical Committee of Yonsei University College of Medicine according to the eighth edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published in 2011. An emulsion was developed that contained indocyanine green in iodized oil, which can be visualized with both computed tomography (CT) and near-infrared (NIR) optical imaging and has the property of delayed washout. This emulsion was injected into the footpad of rats (n = 6) and the gastric submucosa of beagles (n = 8). CT lymphography was performed. The degree of enhancement of popliteal LNs was measured in rats, and the enhancing LNs were identified and the degree of enhancement of the enhancing LNs was measured in beagles. Next, NIR imaging was performed in beagles during open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery to identify LNs containing the fluorescent signals of indocyanine green. The enhanced LNs detected with CT lymphography and NIR imaging were matched to see if they corresponded. RESULTS: Preoperative CT lymphography facilitated SLN mapping, and 26 SLNs were identified in eight beagles. NIR imaging enabled high-spatial-resolution visualization of both SLNs and the intervening lymphatic vessels and was useful for intraoperative SLN navigation. CONCLUSION: SLN mapping with fluorescent iodized oil emulsion is effective and feasible for both CT and NIR imaging.

Nanoscale iodized oil emulsion: a useful tracer for pretreatment sentinel node detection using CT lymphography in a normal canine gastric model.

BACKGROUND: Pretreatment identification of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in gastric cancer patients may have great advantages for minimally invasive treatment. No reliable method for the detection of SLNs during the pretreatment period in gastric cancer has been established. The aim of this study was to determine whether computed tomographic (CT) lymphography using nanoscale iodized oil emulsion via endoscopic submucosal injection can visualize LNs. METHODS: Five dogs underwent CT lymphography after endoscopic submucosal injection of 2 ml of a nanoscale iodized oil emulsion. CT images were taken before and 30, 90, and 210 min after contrast injection. Intraoperative SLN detection was performed using endoscopically injected indocyanine green lymphography for comparison. RESULTS: Computed tomographic lymphography with nanoscale iodized oil emulsion enabled the visualization of 19 enhanced LNs (mean = 3.8/dog, range = 3-6) with a 100% SLN detection rate. The locations of the SLNs were the lesser curvature (n = 7), greater curvature (n = 1), infrapyloric (n = 3), and left gastric (n = 8) areas. Contrast enhancement of SLNs continuously increased and peaked after 210 min at 142.4 ± 42.3 HU. No green LNs were visualized in the three locations that were detected by CT lymphography. However, no additional LNs were visualized using the dye method. The concordance rate based on the LNs between the SLNs on CT lymphography and the green LNs using the ICG method was 84% (16/19), whereas the concordance rate of the stations identified by CT lymphography and the dye method was 78.6% (11/14). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomographic lymphography using nanoscale iodized oil emulsion is a promising tool for preoperative SLN detection for early gastric cancer if the biological safety of the nanoscale iodized oil emulsion can be established.

Efficacy of prepackaged, low residual test meals with 4L polyethylene glycol versus a clear liquid diet with 4L polyethylene glycol bowel preparation: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A prepackaged low residue one-day diet (breakfast, lunch and dinner) has been recently developed to improve patient tolerance for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of bowel preparation protocols based on a low residue diet and 4L polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution, and to compare these new options with the traditional liquid diet and the PEG 4L lavage. METHODS: A total of 214 patients (mean age: 54.1 years; 120 male, 94 female) from four university hospitals were included in the analysis. Patients were randomized to receive a clear liquid diet and the PEG 4L regimen (106 patients) or the low residue test meals and the PEG 4L regimen (TM-PEG 4L, 108 patients). The colon cleansing efficacy of the different preparations was rated using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the treatment groups according to the Ottawa cleansing scale findings (PEG 4L: 2.97 vs TM-PEG 4L: 2.46, P = 0.063). The overall tolerability was higher in the TM-PEG 4L group than in the PEG 4L group (P = 0.036). No difference was found when the two groups were compared with regard to adverse events (P = 0.599). CONCLUSIONS: A prepackaged low residue one-day diet provided cleansing efficacy similar to that of a clear liquid diet and offered the benefit of improved tolerability compared to the conventional PEG 4L regimen.

The effectiveness of simethicone in improving visibility during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In colonoscopy examination, luminal visibility is frequently limited due to intraluminal bubbles. In present study was evaluated factors affecting bubble formation and the effects of simethicone in preventing bubble formation during colonoscopy. METHODOLOGY: Consecutive patients (n=164) who received polyethylene glycol or sodium phosphate for bowel preparation were prospectively enrolled. Before colonoscopy, 57 patients took 80 mg simethicone after ingestion of bowel preparation solution and 107 did not to determine whether simethicone decreased bubble formation. Intraluminal gas bubbles were assessed and graded as follows: 0, minimal or none; 1, covering less than half the lumen; 2, covering at least half the lumen or the entire circumference. Grade 2 bubbles were regarded as significant, limiting visibility. RESULTS: Sodium phosphate preparation tended to have more bubbles than the polyethylene glycol. Significant bubbles were more likely to occur in males than females (p = 0.020). Significant bubbles were noted in 34.6% of patients without simethicone and 7% of patients with simethicone. Simethicone significantly lowered the incidence of bubbles during colonoscopy when given after a preparation solution (p < 0.05), CONCLUSIONS: The present study findings indicate that taking simethicone after an oral polyethylene glycol or sodium phosphate preparation can improve colonic visibility by diminishing colonic bubbles.