Endoscopic management of postoperative fistulas using purse-string suture combined with cyanoacrylate.

A 65-year-old man complained of choking and hoarseness for fifteen days, and was diagnosed with thyroid carcinoma infiltrating esophagus and trachea. Therefore, the patient underwent thyroidectomy, partial esophagectomy, and partial tracheal resection, and histopathology confirmed primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid. Unfortunately, on the tenth postoperative day, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a large fistula (25 mm*20 mm) in esophageal introitus, and diagnosed with tracheoesophageal fistula due to sustained choking. The patient failed to response to conservative treatment within 14 days. Consequently, endoscopic management was performed that the fistula was partly closed by purse-string suture using endoloop and hemostatic clips, then 1 ml of cyanoacrylate (Compon, China) was injected into the fistulous tract through a catheter. Interestingly, the patient's symptom was relieved after the procedure. And, esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed healing of the fistula 14 days later.

Efficacy of low-dose versus high-dose simethicone with polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Additional simethicone (SIM) can improve adequate bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, there is no consensus on the optimal dose of SIM. In this study, we compared the adequate bowel preparation rate with supplementation of split-dose 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with low-dose SIM (200 mg) versus high-dose SIM (1200 mg). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded trial involving consecutive subjects undergoing colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation as assessed by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score. RESULTS: Four hundred subjects were randomly allocated to low-dose SIM or high-dose SIM group. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups (P > 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed with respect to total bubble scale (BS) (8.49 ± 1.00 vs 8.39 ± 1.10, P = 0.07), total BBPS score (8.70 ± 0.81 vs 8.29 ± 1.18, P = 0.98), ADR (33.68% vs 31.79%, P = 0.69) or withdrawal time (13 [range, 10-16] min vs 13 [10-15] min, P = 0.96). The intubation time in low-dose SIM group was significantly shorter than that in high-dose SIM group (8 (4-16) min vs 10 [6-17] min, P = 0.04). In addition, BS scores as well as diminutive ADR in right colon were superior in the low-dose SIM group (2.68 ± 0.59 vs 2.52 ± 0.73, P = 0.03 and 54.29% vs 30.30%, P = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSION: Addition of low-dose SIM to split-dose 2 L PEG was as effective as addition of high-dose SIM with respect to adequate bowel preparation, ADR and patient tolerance. However, low-dose SIM was superior with respect to intubation time, right colon BS scores, right colon diminutive ADR and cost savings.

Optimal Timing of Simethicone Supplement for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Aims: Simethicone (SIM), as an antifoaming agent, has been shown to improve bowel preparation during colonoscopy. However, the optimal timing of SIM addition remained undetermined. We aimed to investigate the optimal timing of SIM addition to polyethylene glycol (PEG) to improve bowel preparation. Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the SIM evening group (SIM addition to PEG in the evening of the day prior to colonoscopy) and the SIM morning group (SIM addition to PEG in the morning of colonoscopy). The primary outcome was Bubble Scale (BS). The secondary outcomes were Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Results: A total of 419 patients were enrolled in this study. The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of BS (8.76 ± 0.90 vs. 8.65 ± 1.16, P = 0.81), ADR (34.1% vs. 30.8%, P = 0.47), Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (8.59 ± 0.94 vs. 8.45 ± 1.00, P = 0.15), and withdrawal time (8.22 ± 2.04 vs. 8.01 ± 2.51, P = 0.094) between the two groups. Moreover, safety and compliance were similar in both groups. However, the SIM evening group was associated with shorter cecal intubation time (3.80 ± 1.81 vs. 4.42 ± 2.03, P < 0.001), higher BS (2.95 ± 0.26 vs. 2.88 ± 0.38, P = 0.04) in the right colon, and diminutive ADR (62.5% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.022) in the right colon, when compared to the SIM evening group. Conclusions: The SIM addition to PEG in the evening of the day prior to colonoscopy can shorten cecal intubation time and improve BS scores and diminutive ADR of the right colon compared with the SIM addition to PEG in the morning of colonoscopy in bowel preparation.

Polyglycolic acid sheets decrease post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, post-ESD bleeding remains a serious issue, particularly in patients treated with an antithrombotic agent or those have had a large mucosal resection (≥4 cm). Whether covering the ulcer bed induced by ESD with polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets can prevent post-ESD bleeding remains to be questioned. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of PGA sheets on preventing post-ESD bleeding in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) at a high risk of post-ESD bleeding. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were searched for studies on the effect of PGA sheets shielding on inpatients with EGC and at a high risk of bleeding using post-ESD bleeding rate as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Among the four included studies (212 lesions in the PGA sheet group and 208 in the control group), post-ESD bleeding rate was significantly lower in the PGA sheet group than in the control group (4.9% vs 13.7%, risk ratio [RR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.72, P = 0.004). A subgroup analysis showed that the application of PGA sheets effectively reduced the post-ESD bleeding rate in patients receiving antithrombotic agents (5.5% vs 15.2%; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.79, P = 0.01). Although the application of PGA sheets tended to decrease the post-ESD bleeding rate in patients who had undergone large mucosal resections, the difference was not significant (4.5% vs 9.6%; RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.15-1.78, P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: PGA sheets can effectively prevent post-ESD bleeding in patients receiving antithrombotic agents. Further studies are needed to confirm whether PGA sheets can decrease post-ESD bleeding in patients underwent large mucosal resection.