Three-Dimensional Analysis of Vomer Volume and Deviation in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Alveolus.

Since almost all patients with an alveolar cleft have a deviated and thickened vomer bone, the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the vomer shape and the size of the alveolar cleft in patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (CLA). A total of 40 adult patients with unilateral CLA were enrolled, and 40 normal adults without CLA were enrolled as controls. All patients underwent preoperative computed tomography scans and analysis by computer-aided engineering software to obtain the vomer volume (VV), deviated septal angle (DSA), and alveolar cleft volume (ACV). An independent-sample t test or nonparametric test was used to compare the VV and DSA between the unilateral CLA and control groups. The correlation between ACV, VV, and DSA in the unilateral CLA group was assessed using Pearson correlation analysis or Spearman correlation analysis. Vomer volume was significantly higher in patients with CLA (1595.35±48.45 mm3) than in the control group (1043.2±164.976 mm3) (P<0.001), as was DSA (13.099±7.0 versus 3.4398±1.74 degrees) (P<0.001). In the CLA group, VV and DSA were significantly associated with ACV (VV and ACV: r=0.886, P<0.001; DSA and ACV: r=0.543, P<0.001), and VV was significantly correlated with DSA (VV and DSA: r=0.582, P<0.001). In conclusion, the vomer is thicker and more convex in patients with unilateral CLA than in people without, and the vomer angle and degree of volume deviation correlate with alveolar cleft severity.

Comparison of Two Methods for Presurgical Volumetric Evaluation of Alveolar Cleft Bone Defects Using Computer-Aided Engineering.

ABSTRACT: Precise volumetric evaluation of the alveolar cleft facilitates accurate preparation of bone substitutes and reduces donor site morbidity. This study investigates 2 advanced presurgical volumetric assessment methods that use computer-aided engineering (CAE) software. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans from 20 unilateral alveolar cleft patients undergoing secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) were analyzed by CAE software. Cleft defect volumes were calculated using the mirror-reversed technique and the subtraction method. The mirror-reversed technique determines defect volume by reversing the noncleft side to the cleft side. The subtraction method determines defect volume by subtracting a mask of the preoperative cleft from a mask generated after simulated cleft filling. The mean defect volumes and calculation times of the mirror-reversed technique (1.27 ±â€Š0.35 cm3; 11.80 ±â€Š1.79 seconds) and the subtractive method (1.23 ±â€Š0.32 cm3; 9.43 ±â€Š1.35 seconds) did not differ significantly. In Bland-Altman analysis the 2 methods were equivalent for alveolar cleft defect assessment. Both methods exhibited acceptable interobserver reliability, high precision, clinical convenience, time efficiency, and high reproducibility, and can serve as valuable tools for the planning and execution of SABG. The subtraction method has broader potential applicability and can simulate intraoperative bone grafting more effectively.