Quantitative determination of the enantiomers of methadone in human plasma and saliva by chiral column chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detection.

Methadone is a potent lipophilic synthetic opioid that is effective in the treatment of cancer pain and perceived benefit in difficult pain control scenarios (especially in cases of neuropathic pain). The use of methadone in clinical practice is challenging however, due to the narrow therapeutic window and large inter- and intra-individual variability in therapeutic response. Quantitation of the enantiomers d- and l-methadone (d- and l-MTD) in plasma and saliva provides a basis for studying its pharmacokinetics in patients with cancer and for monitoring efficacy, toxicity and side-effects. This assay involves quantitation of the enantiomers of methadone using their respective deuterated internal standards, in plasma and saliva matrices with no impact of ion suppression in either matrix. The analytical recoveries of d- and l-MTD from the saliva collection devices (Salivette®) are optimised in this novel method with an accurate and simple extraction method employing dichloromethane. Optimal enantioselective separations were achieved using an α1-acid glycoprotein chiral stationary phase and triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer. Linearity was demonstrated over 0.05-1000µg/L for both enantiomers in plasma and in saliva with correlation coefficients greater than 0.998. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was determined to be 0.1µg/L in plasma and saliva for d- and l-MTD. Accuracy of the method ranges from 100% to 106% even at the LLOQ and total precision, expressed as the coefficient of variation, was between 0.2% and 4.4% for both analytes in both matrices. A simple one step extraction procedure resulted in recoveries greater than 95% for both analytes, at concentrations as low as 0.5µg/L, from the Salivette®. The validated method was applied successfully in 14 paired plasma and saliva samples obtained from adult patients with cancer pain receiving methadone.

Saliva versus Plasma for Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies of Fentanyl in Patients with Cancer.

PURPOSE: Fentanyl is widely used to relieve cancer pain. However there is great interpatient variation in the dose required to relieve pain and little knowledge about the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of fentanyl and pain control. Patients with cancer are fragile and there is reluctance on the part of health professionals to take multiple plasma samples for PK/PD studies. The relationship between plasma and saliva fentanyl concentrations was investigated to determine whether saliva could be a valid substitute for plasma in PK/PD studies. METHODS: One hundred sixty-three paired plasma and saliva samples were collected from 56 patients prescribed transdermal fentanyl (Durogesic, Janssen-Cilag Pty Limited, NSW, Australia) at varying doses (12-200 µg/h). Pain scores were recorded at the time of sampling. Fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in plasma and saliva were quantified using HPLC-MS/MS. FINDINGS: Saliva concentrations of fentanyl (mean = 4.84 µg/L) were much higher than paired plasma concentrations of fentanyl (mean = 0.877 µg/L). Both plasma and saliva mean concentrations of fentanyl were well correlated with dose with considerable interpatient variation at each dose. The relationship between fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations was poor in both plasma and saliva. No correlation was observed between fentanyl concentration in plasma and saliva (r(2) = 0.3743) or free fentanyl in plasma and total saliva concentrations (r(2) = 0.1374). Pain scores and fentanyl concentration in either of the matrices were also not correlated. IMPLICATIONS: No predictive correlation was observed between plasma and saliva fentanyl concentration. However the detection of higher fentanyl concentrations in saliva than plasma, with a good correlation to dose, may allow saliva to be used as an alternative to plasma in PK/PD studies of fentanyl in patients with cancer.

Development, validation and application of an HPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of fentanyl and nor-fentanyl in human plasma and saliva.

Monitoring fentanyl concentration in saliva and plasma may be useful in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies. Salivettes(®) have been used widely for collecting saliva samples. However due to its lipophilicity, fentanyl adsorbs to the cotton dental bud (CDB) used in this device. Furthermore, due to dry mouth being a common adverse effect seen in patients treated with opioids, obtaining enough saliva for analysis is often a challenge. Hence, a simple simultaneous method to quantify fentanyl and its metabolite in both human plasma and saliva was developed and validated. A novel extraction method was also developed and validated to recover fentanyl in saliva directly from the CDB. This extraction method utilises acetonitrile to recover the fentanyl directly from the CDB rather than recovery by centrifugation, which is not always possible. Reverse phase chromatographic separation was performed on a Shimadzu LC 20A HPLC system using gradient elution. The electrospray ion source (ESI) was operated in positive ion mode using an Applied Biosystems API 3200 LC/MS/MS as detector. Deuterated fentanyl (D5) and nor-fentanyl (D5) were used as internal standards (IS). The retention times for fentanyl and nor-fentanyl were 3.70 min and 3.20 min respectively. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was determined to be 0.030 µg/L in plasma and 0.045 in saliva for fentanyl and nor-fentanyl. Acceptable linearity for fentanyl and nor-fentanyl in both plasma and saliva was demonstrated from 0.02 to 10 µg/L (R(2) 0.9988-0.9994). Accuracy for fentanyl and nor-fentanyl in both plasma and saliva samples was between 96% and 108%. Total imprecision expressed as the co-efficient of variation was between 1.0 and 15.5% for both analytes in both matrices. The validated method was applied successfully in 11 paired plasma and saliva samples obtained from patients with cancer pain receiving transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic(®)) at doses from 25 µg to 100 µg.