Prelamination of Anterolateral Thigh Osseocutaneous Flap With Fibula for the Reconstruction of Zygomatic Arch Defects After Facial Trauma.

Complex facial trauma usually results in significant physical, esthetical, functional, and psychological damage. Nowadays, tissue flap transfer is the most effective and common treatment for the reconstruction of facial defects. Among them, the prelaminated flap has a bigger role in reconstructing massive facial defects. In this report, the authors have described a case of a 48-year-old man who presented a complex defect of tissue and deformity in the oral and maxillofacial region because of traffic accident trauma. Given the complexity of this case, it was impossible to complete the reconstruction in a single operation. The authors used a vascularized fibula-free flap (VFFF) to reconstruct the right mandible during the first operation and implanted a segment of fibula into the subcutaneous tissue of the right anterolateral thigh, which was used during the second operation for the reconstruction of zygomatic arch. This individualized treatment plan achieved a final satisfactory surgical outcome.

Incidence of Unintentional Intraoperative Hypothermia and Its Risk Factors in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: Unintentional intraoperative hypothermia is a common complication in patients who undergo open surgery, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. However, few studies have focused on intraoperative hypothermia during oral and maxillofacial surgery. Our study aimed to analyze the prevalence and risk factors of hypothermia in patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 128 patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at West China Hospital of Stomatology between December 2020 and May 2021, and each patient was followed for at least 1-month postoperatively. Patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia, with at least 1-month follow-up were analyzed. The primary variable was intraoperative hypothermia, defined as core body temperature less than 36°C, measured using a tympanic thermometer during the surgery. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors of unintentional intraoperative hypothermia. FINDINGS: The mean age of the 128 patients was 31.0 ± 20.9 years, and there was a male predominance (53.1%), with male to female ratio of 1.13:1. Thirty-one patients (24.2%) developed hypothermia intraoperatively. Older age (OR = 1.068, 95% CI: 1.028-1.110, P = .001), lower weight (OR = 0.878, 95% CI: 0.807-0.955, P = .002), greater blood loss (OR = 1.003, 95% CI: 1.000-1.006, P = .034), and undergoing cancer surgery (OR = 0.210, 95% CI: 0.067-0.656, P = .007) were associated with intraoperative hypothermia. CONCLUSIONS: Unintentional intraoperative hypothermia is common in patients who undergo surgery for oral cancer. Warming interventions to prevent intraoperative hypothermia for high-risk patients (older, lower weight, or more intraoperative bleeding) should be considered. Meanwhile, with careful nursing and rehabilitation instructions, intraoperative hypothermia does not lead to serious perioperative complications.

Functional and aesthetic results of the Z-shaped and straight lower lip-splitting incision: a randomized clinical trial.

The lip-splitting approach enables excellent access to all areas of the mouth and pharynx to remove tumors; however, traditional lower lip-splitting incisions produce an unsatisfactory scar. To achieve better functional and aesthetic results, we used a Z-shaped incision and compared the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the straight and Z-shaped incisions. Sixty patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups and underwent lip-splitting between March 2021 and September 2023. Eventually, 77 patients were reviewed within 6 months and evaluated using the lip function assessment scale, patient and observer scar assessment scale, naïve observer scar assessment scale, and a clinical examination. The Z-shaped incision group performed better in terms of the lip pout movement at 3 months and in the subjective overall opinion, color, irregularity, and pigmentation at 6 months. The Z-shaped incision group had a lower incidence of notched vermilion. In conclusion, Z-shaped lower lip-splitting incisions have better functional and aesthetic outcomes than traditional straight incisions.Trial registration: Public title: Difference between the effect of Z-shaped and vertical incisions of labiobuccal flap on the recovery of lower lip scars. Registration date: 09/03/2021. Registration number: ChiCTR2100044084. Registry URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn .

Reconstruction of Total Maxillectomy Defects Using Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap, Titanium Mesh, and Free Flap.

The maxilla plays a crucial role in maintaining midfacial contour, supporting the globe and dentition and separating the oral and nasal cavity. Reconstruction of total maxillectomy defects has always been a challenge in head and neck surgery. In recent years, on the basis of existing methods, we have used the coronoid-temporalis pedicled flap combined with personalized titanium mesh and free flap to reconstruct total maxillectomy defects. This combination of multiple methods can restore the functional subunits of the maxilla. In this report, we introduce our surgical procedures in detail and assess the postoperative effects. Postoperative facial aesthetic outcomes were satisfactory in all 8 patients. None of the patients showed diplopia, oral-nasal reflux, hypernasality, titanium mesh exposure, or trismus. This new surgical procedure may be a simple and feasible option for the reconstruction of total maxillectomy defects.

Segmental mandibulectomy and microvascular reconstruction with fibula free flap: Comparison between intraoral and extraoral approaches.

BACKGROUND: Segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction of resulting defect can be performed via intraoral approach (IOA) or extraoral approach (EOA). Both approaches have advantages, disadvantages, indications, and contraindications to consider during their selection. OBJECTIVE: To compare IOA vs EOA of segmental mandibulectomy and microvascular reconstruction with fibula free flap (FFF). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in which 51 patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy and microvascular reconstruction with FFF from 2020 to 2024 were included, especially 17 patients by IOA and 34 patients by EOA, representing both groups of this study. Clinical characteristics, surgery parameters, and patients' prognosis were evaluated. Patients' satisfaction and Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59) were assessed during follow-up. RESULTS: Ameloblastoma was the most frequent diagnosis (52.9% managed by IOA vs 70.6% by EOA); FFF was frequently positioned as double barrel (94.1% managed by IOA vs 88.2% by EOA). Compared with EOA group, IOA group had less intraoperative blood loss (mean difference [MD] = -112.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -178.9 to -45.5, p = 0.001), higher satisfaction score (MD = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.9 to 1.7, p ˂ 0.001), and lower DAS59 score (MD = -0.5, 95% CI: -0.7 to -0.2, p ˂ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both IOA and EOA were found safe and feasible, presenting similar perioperative features and postoperative outcomes. Patients managed with IOA were more satisfied with aesthetic outcomes than patients managed with EOA. In the absence of simultaneous immediate implant during mandibular FFF reconstruction, after stability of FFF on the defect site, patients should always be referred to an implantologist and/or prosthodontist for teeth restoration to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Evaluation of a newly developed oral and maxillofacial surgical robotic platform (KD-SR-01) in head and neck surgery: a preclinical trial in porcine models.

Traditional open head and neck surgery often leaves permanent scars, significantly affecting appearance. The emergence of surgical robots has introduced a new era for minimally invasive surgery. However, the complex anatomy of the head and neck region, particularly the oral and maxillofacial areas, combined with the high costs associated with established systems such as the da Vinci, has limited the widespread adoption of surgical robots in this field. Recently, surgical robotic platform in China has developed rapidly, exemplified by the promise shown by the KangDuo Surgical Robot (KD-SR). Although the KD-SR has achieved some results comparable to the da Vinci surgical robot in urology and colorectal surgery, its performance in complex head and neck regions remains untested. This study evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of the newly developed KD-SR-01, comparing it with standard endoscopic systems in head and neck procedures on porcine models. We performed parotidectomy, submandibular gland resection, and neck dissection, collected baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and specifically assessed cognitive workload using the NASA-TLX. None of the robotic procedures were converted to endoscopic or open surgery. The results showed no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P = 0.126), better intraoperative bleeding control (P = 0.001), and a significant reduction in cognitive workload (P < 0.001) in the robotic group. In conclusion, the KD-SR-01 is feasible, effective, and safe for head and neck surgery. Further investigation through well-designed clinical trials with long-term follow-up is necessary to establish the full potential of this emerging robotic platform.

Application of vascularized mucosal flap for early-medium-term tongue cancer and floor of mouth cancer defect repair: a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap for small-medium tongue or floor of mouth defects caused by surgical resection of early-medium stage tongue or floor of mouth cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted and included patients with early-medium stage tongue or floor of mouth cancer and reconstructed by FAMM flap or traditional free or axial flaps. Demographic data and surgery-related data were collected. Patients were followed up for 6 months and evaluated with satisfaction, maximal mouth opening, satisfactory contour and speech, and oral intake function at months 3 and 6. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included, with 15 in the FAMM group and 30 in the flap group. All patients finished 3 months follow-up, and 1 in each group was lost to follow-up at month 6. All followed-up patients had no recurrence or metastasis. The FAMM group had a significantly shorter surgical time than the flap group (P<0.05). The flap group had significantly more donor sites that were uncomfortable compared with the FAMM group (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance on satisfaction, but the FAMM group had better outcomes on contour, speech, and oral intake function at month 6 than the flap group (P<0.05). The FAMM group had smaller maximal mouth opening than the flap group (P<0.05) at month 3 but equivalent maximal mouth opening at month 6 (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FAMM flap has some advantages for small-medium tongue or floor of mouth defects caused by surgical resection of early-medium stage tongue or floor of mouth cancer, and it could be an ideal choice for clinical application.