Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hepatol ; 62(6): 1246-55, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25559324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy and tolerability of faldaprevir, a potent hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, plus peginterferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype-1 infection. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:2:2) to PegIFN/RBV plus: placebo (arm 1, n = 132) for 24 weeks; faldaprevir (120 mg, once daily) for 12 or 24 weeks (arm 2, n = 259); or faldaprevir (240 mg, once daily) for 12 weeks (arm 3, n = 261). In arms 2 and 3, patients with early treatment success (HCV-RNA <25 IU/ml at week 4 and undetectable at week 8) stopped all treatment at week 24. Other patients received PegIFN/RBV until week 48 unless they met futility criteria. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). RESULTS: SVR12 was achieved by 52%, 79%, and 80% of patients in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively (estimated difference for arms 2 and 3 vs. arm 1: 27%, 95% confidence interval 17%-36%; and 29%, 95% confidence interval, 19%-38%, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both). Early treatment success was achieved by 87% (arm 2) and 89% (arm 3) of patients, of whom 86% and 89% achieved SVR12. Adverse event rates were similar among groups; few adverse events led to discontinuation of all regimen components. CONCLUSIONS: Faldaprevir plus PegIFN/RBV significantly increased SVR12, compared with PegIFN/RBV, in treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype-1 infection. No differences were seen in responses of patients given faldaprevir once daily at 120 or 240 mg.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Oligopeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Tiazóis/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Ácidos Aminoisobutíricos , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/classificação , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/efeitos adversos , Leucina/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oligopeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Quinolinas , RNA Viral/sangue , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Ribavirina/efeitos adversos , Tiazóis/efeitos adversos
2.
J Clin Med ; 10(22)2021 Nov 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34830701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Second-generation thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are emerging as the new standard for managing thrombocytopenia (TCP) in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs) undergoing scheduled procedures. However, practical guidance for their routine use in CLD patients undergoing specific invasive procedures is lacking. METHODS: These practice guidelines were developed by the Initiative Group for Central European Hepatologic Collaboration (CEHC), composed of nine hepatologist/gastroenterologist experts from Central Europe. Using an adapted Delphi process, the CEHC group selected ten invasive procedures most relevant to the hepatology/gastroenterology setting in the region. Consensus recommendations for each invasive procedure are reported as a final percentage of expert panel responses. RESULTS: A consensus was agreed that TPO-RAs should be considered for raising platelet count in CLD patients undergoing scheduled abdominal surgery, high-bleeding risk dentistry, endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic variceal ligation, liver biopsy, liver surgery, liver transplantation and percutaneous ablation, but it was also agreed that they are less beneficial or not necessary for endoscopy without intervention and paracentesis. CONCLUSIONS: Using a modified Delphi method, experts reached an agreement for TCP management in CLD patients undergoing ten invasive procedures. These practice guidelines may help with decision making and patient management in areas where clinical evidence is absent or limited.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA