Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 16(5): 593-599, 2019 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30508168

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients experience pathological fractures and the typical poor bone quality frequently complicates stabilization. Methods for overcoming screw failure include utilization of fenestrated screws that permit the injection of bone cement into the vertebral body to augment fixation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cement augmentation via fenestrated screws. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with neoplastic spinal instability who underwent percutaneous instrumented stabilization with cement augmentation using fenestrated pedicle screws. Patient demographic and treatment data and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated by chart review and radiographic evaluation. Prospectively collected patient reported outcomes (PRO) were evaluated at short (2- <6 mo) and long term (6-12 mo). RESULTS: Cement augmentation was performed in 216 fenestrated pedicle screws in 53 patients. Three patients required reoperation. One patient had an asymptomatic screw fracture at 6 mo postoperatively that did not require intervention. No cases of lucency around the pedicle screws, rod fractures, or cement extravasation into the spinal canal were observed. Eight cases of asymptomatic, radiographically-detected venous extravasation were found. Systemic complications included a pulmonary cement embolism, a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, and a postoperative mortality secondary to pulmonary failure from widespread metastatic pulmonary infiltration. Significant improvement in PRO measures was found in short- and long-term analysis. CONCLUSION: Cement augmentation of pedicle screws is an effective method to enhance the durability of spinal constructs in the cancer population. Risks include cement extravasation into draining blood vessels, but risk of clinically significant extravasation appears to be exceedingly low.


Assuntos
Cimentos Ósseos , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Parafusos Pediculares , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Instabilidade Articular/diagnóstico por imagem , Cifoplastia/efeitos adversos , Cifoplastia/instrumentação , Cifoplastia/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto Jovem
2.
Spine J ; 15(7): 1609-17, 2015 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25828478

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pathologic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) represent a major source of morbidity and diminished quality of life in the spinal oncology population. Procedures with low morbidity that effectively treat patients with pathologic fractures are especially important in the cancer population where life expectancy is limited. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are often not effective for mechanically unstable pathologic fractures extending into the pedicle and facet joints. Combination of cement augmentation and percutaneous instrumented stabilization represents a minimally invasive treatment option that does not delay radiation and systemic therapy. PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cement-augmented short-segment percutaneous posterolateral instrumentation for tumor-associated VCF with pedicle and joint involvement. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients underwent cement-augmented percutaneous spinal fixation for unstable tumors between 2011 and 2014. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, including visual analog pain scale (VAS) response score and procedural complications, was performed. RESULTS: Patients with a median composite Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scale score of 10 (range=8-15) were treated with constructs spanning one to four disk spaces (median of two spaces, constituting 84% of all cases). The proportion of patients with severe pain decreased from 86% preoperatively to 0%; 65% of patients reported no referable instability pain postoperatively. There was one adjacent-level fracture responsive to kyphoplasty, and one case of asymptomatic screw pullout. Two patients subsequently required decompression in the setting of disease progression despite radiation; there was no perioperative morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous cement-augmented posterolateral spinal fixation is a safe and effective option for palliation of appropriately selected mechanically unstable VCF that extends into pedicle and/or joint.


Assuntos
Cimentos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Parafusos Pediculares , Neoplasias da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fraturas por Compressão/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Medula Espinal/complicações , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA