Reducing Peri-implant Capsule Thickness in Submuscular Rodent Model of Breast Reconstruction With Delayed Radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Capsular contracture remains the most common complication following device-based breast reconstruction, occurring in up to 50% of women who also undergo adjuvant radiotherapy either before or after device-based reconstruction. While certain risk factors for capsular contracture have been identified, there remains no clinically effective method of prevention. The purpose of the present study is to determine the effect of coating the implant with the novel small molecule Met-Z2-Y12, with and without delayed, targeted radiotherapy, on capsule thickness and morphologic change around smooth silicone implants placed under the latissimus dorsi in a rodent model. METHODS: Twenty-four female Sprague Dawley rats each had 2 mL smooth round silicone breast implants implanted bilaterally under the latissimus dorsi muscle. Twelve received uncoated implants and twelve received implants coated with Met-Z2-Y12. Half of the animals from each group received targeted radiotherapy (20 Gray) on postoperative day ten. At three and 6 months after implantation, the tissue surrounding the implants was harvested for analysis of capsular histology including capsule thickness. Additionally, microCT scans were qualitatively analyzed for morphologic change. RESULTS: Capsules surrounding Met-Z2-Y12-coated implants were significantly thinner (P = 0.006). The greatest difference in capsule thickness was seen in the irradiated 6-month groups, where mean capsule thickness was 79.1 ± 27.3 µm for uncoated versus 50.9 ± 9.6 µm for Met-Z2-Y12-coated implants (P = 0.038). At the time of explant, there were no capsular morphologic differences between the groups either grossly or per microCT. CONCLUSIONS: Met-Z2-Y12 coating of smooth silicone breast implants significantly reduces capsule thickness in a rodent model of submuscular breast reconstruction with delayed radiotherapy.

Is There a Safe Zone for Lateral Border Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures?

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study design. OBJECTIVE: There are multiple accepted treatment options for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a safe zone for lateral border fixation of mandibular angle fractures. METHODS: One hundred coronal images of facial computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed on patients between the ages of 18 to 48. Measurements were taken in the area of the second and third molar region related to the inferior border to the superior extent of the inferior alveolar canal and apex of the second molar root, along with buccal cortical measurements to the inferior alveolar canal and apical third of the second molar root. RESULTS: The average measurement of the inferior border in the second molar area to the inferior alveolar canal and apex of the root was 1.12 cm (0.70-1.77) and 1.39 cm (0.91-2.30), respectively. The average measurement of the inferior border of the third molar to the inferior alveolar canal was 1.26 cm (0.78-1.83). The average measurement of the buccal cortex of the second molar to the inferior alveolar canal and apical one-third of the root was 0.64 cm (0.34-1.25) and 0.59 cm (0.33-0.98), respectively. The average measurement of the third molar buccal cortex to the inferior alveolar canal was 0.45 cm (0.18-0.98). CONCLUSION: In the area of the second molar region, there is no ubiquitous safe zone for screw placement, cortical bone thickness is more critical than vertical placement of the fixation plate and screws. In the third molar region, cortical bone thickness and vertical orientation may provide a safe zone for screw placement.