APPOSITION V: STENTYS coronary stent system clinical trial in subjects with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has considerably improved clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when compared with thrombolytic therapy. Prognosis after primary PCI might be further improved by decreasing stent-related complications such as stent thrombosis. The STENTYS self-apposing stent has been shown to be superior compared with balloon-expandable stents with regard to stent apposition. The current prospective randomized trial was designed to evaluate whether the superior stent apposition of the STENTYS stent results in clinical outcomes that are at least noninferior to a conventional balloon-expandable stent. METHODS: The APPOSITION V is a prospective, multicenter, international, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial in STEMI patients. Randomization will be performed in a 2:1 ratio between the self-apposing nitinol bare-metal STENTYS stent and the balloon-expandable bare-metal MULTI-LINK. The primary end point is defined as target vessel failure, which is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related recurrent myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization, at 1-year follow-up. Baseline intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudies will be performed in 212 and 60 subjects, respectively, and a repeat angiography at 12 to 13 months will be performed in 105 subjects, including intravascular ultrasound and OCT (in the 60 OCT patients). This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT01732341. CONCLUSION: APPOSITION V will be the first randomized trial powered on clinical end points that directly compares the STENTYS self-apposing stent with a conventional balloon-expandable stent in patients presenting with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

[Coronary stents: 30 years of medical progress]. / Stents coronaires - 30 ans de progrès médical.

The history of interventional cardiology has been marked by several technologic revolutions since the late 1970s. The first key step was the use of inflatable balloon angioplasty as an alternative to CABG surgery for coronary revascularization, followed by intracoronary delivery of bare metal stent (BMS) and drug eluting stents (DES) to drastically reduce intracoronary restenosis observed with BMS. Improved stents platforms and polymers (absorbable or biocompatible) led to a dramatic reduction in the rate of late stent thrombosis. Self-expanding stents are now available to improve stent a position especially in acute myocardial infarction. The emergence of new fully bioabsorbable stents that can be combined with antiproliferative drugs is the ongoing revolution. A new generation of stents is continuously improving and likely to become the ideal stent for coronary revascularization in the near future.

SYNERGY-Everolimus-Eluting Stent With a Bioabsorbable Polymer in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: CLEAR SYNERGY OASIS-9 Registry.

Our objective was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the SYNERGY stent (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The only drug-eluting stent approved for treatment of STEMI by the Food and Drug Administration is the Taxus stent (Boston Scientific) which is no longer commercially available, so further data are needed. The CLEAR (Colchicine and spironolactone in patients with myocardial infarction) SYNERGY stent registry was embedded into a larger randomized trial of patients with STEMI (n = 7,000), comparing colchicine versus placebo and spironolactone versus placebo. The primary outcome for the SYNERGY stent registry is major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as defined by cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, or unplanned ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization within 12 months. We estimated a MACE rate of 6.3% at 12 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI based on the Thrombectomy vs percutaneous coronary intervention alone in STEMI (TOTAL) trial. Success was defined as upper bound of confidence interval (CI) to be less than the performance goal of 9.45%. Overall, 733 patients were enrolled from 8 countries with a mean age 60 years, 19.4% diabetes mellitus, 41.3% anterior MI, and median door-to-balloon time of 72 minutes. The MACE rate was 4.8% (95% CI 3.2 to 6.3%) at 12 months which met the success criteria against performance goal of 9.45%. The rates of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, or target vessel revascularization were 2.7%, 1.9%, 1.0%, respectively. The rates of acute definite stent thrombosis were 0.3%, subacute 0.4%, late 0.4%, and cumulative stent thrombosis of 1.1% at 12 months. In conclusion, the SYNERGY stent in STEMI performed well and was successful compared with the performance goal based on previous trials.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Caused by Bifurcation Culprit Lesions Treated With the Stentys Self-Apposing Coronary Stent: Results From the APPOSITION III Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after treatment with the Stentys self-apposing stent (Stentys SAS; Stentys S.A.) for bifurcation culprit lesions. BACKGROUND: The nitinol, self-expanding Stentys was initially developed as a dedicated bifurcation stent. The stent facilitates a provisional strategy by accommodating its diameter to both the proximal and distal reference diameters and offering an opportunity to "disconnect" the interconnectors, opening the stent toward the side branch. METHODS: The APPOSITION (a post-market registry to assess the Stentys self-expanding coronary stent in acute myocardial infarction) III study was a prospective, multicenter, international, observational study including STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Stentys SAS. Clinical endpoints were evaluated and stratified by bifurcation vs non-bifurcation culprit lesions. RESULTS: From 965 patients included, a total of 123 (13%) were documented as having a bifurcation lesion. Target-vessel revascularization (TVR) rates were higher in the bifurcation subgroup (16.4% vs 10.0%; P=.04). Although not statistically significant, other endpoints were numerically higher in the bifurcation subgroup: major adverse cardiac events (MACE; 12.7% vs 8.8%), myocardial infarction (MI; 3.4% vs 1.8%), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST; 5.8% vs 3.1%). However, when postdilation was performed, clinical endpoints were similar between bifurcation and non-bifurcation lesions: MACE (8.7% vs 8.4%), MI (1.2% vs 0.7%), and definite/probable ST (3.7% vs 2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Stentys SAS was safe and feasible for the treatment of bifurcation lesions in the setting of primary PCI for STEMI treatment with acceptable 1-year cardiovascular event rates, which improved when postdilation was performed.

Predictive factors of cardiac events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: The factors associated with recurrent restenosis after SES implantation for in-stent restenosis are unknown. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome and to analyse predictive factors of cardiac events in patients with in-stent restenosis treated with Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). METHODS: In 3 centers, consecutive patients (n = 100) with elective indication to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (n = 110) were treated with SES: 28 lesions were focal, 40 diffuse, 17 proliferative, and 15 showed total occlusion. RESULTS: SES implantation was successful in all patients, without complication during the first hospital stay. The mean follow-up was 15 (10-24) months. A cardiac event related to the target vessel occurred in 24 (24%) patients, and was associated with dialysis status (p < 0.05), lower ejection fraction (p < 0.05) and revascularization without SES in another site (p < 0.0001). A cardiac event related to the SES occurred in 11 (11%) patients, secondary to an acute or sub-acute thrombosis of the SES (2%), to a late occlusion of the target vessel (4%) or to a non-occlusive restenosis of the SES (5%), and was associated with unstable angina (p < 0.01), multivessel disease (p < 0.03) and revascularization without SES in another site (p < 0.03). No cardiac event related to the SES occurred in patients with direct stenting. Target lesion revascularization for in-SES restenosis or occlusion of the target vessel was performed in 7 (7%) patients, and was associated with unstable angina (p < 0.01) and revascularization without SES in another site (p < 0.01). Target vessel revascularization was needed in 20 patients (20%), related to dialysis status (p < 0.01) and a revascularization without SES in another site (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: SESs are effective in the treatment of high risk patients with complex in-stent restenosis. Most of cardiac events during follow-up are related to a revascularization without SES in another site.

Real-life management of dual antiplatelet therapy interruption: the REGINA survey.

BACKGROUND: Concern about procedure-related bleeding is a major reason for premature discontinuation of dual oral antiplatelet therapy (APT); treatment cessation is detrimental in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), especially after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement. The nationwide REGINA survey was designed to evaluate how the interruption of dual APT is managed in the 'real world'. METHODS: Physicians (2700/4581) were randomly selected to participate in a computer-assisted telephone interview. Knowledge about DES and APT was appraised by multiple-choice questions. Strategies for temporary interruption of dual APT before an invasive or surgical procedure were evaluated using 21 scenarios, including high-risk (30 days after DES) and low-risk (18 months after DES) periods. RESULTS: Out of 2700 practitioners, 2515 completed the interview. Rates of correct answers to basic knowledge questions ranged from 0% (dentists) to 52% (cardiologists). Unjustified total interruption of dual APT was much more frequent than expected (22.0% vs. 11.8%). A strategy of total interruption was less frequently chosen in the period of high ischemic risk compared to the low-risk period (13.7% vs. 31.1%, p<0.0001). Dual APT interruption in patients who require additional invasive cardiac or surgical procedures depended on type of physician consulted (more frequent in specialists than general practitioners or dentists), and on the physician's age and practice type (rural/private vs. urban/hospital). Correct answers were more frequently given in situations bearing a major risk, either ischemic or bleeding risk, than in those with no risk (49.2% vs. 30.2%, p<0.0001). Low-molecular-weight heparin was the substitution therapy in over two-thirds of scenarios and was associated with longer periods of APT interruption. INTERPRETATION: Adequate management of APT in patients with intracoronary stents who undergo potentially haemorrhagic invasive procedures depends mainly on the type of physician involved and their practice rather than on a carefully weighted assessment of ischemic/bleeding risk. Our findings suggest a lack of scientific evidence, insufficient knowledge of guidelines, and poor communication between physicians managing these patients.