Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Phlebology ; 36(7): 555-561, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33499728

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Simon Nitinol filter is a bi-level filtration device designed for permanent implantation that is no longer commercially available, but may result in similar complications to current commercially available long term indwelling temporary or permanent filters. Complications related to indwelling inferior vena cava filters include inferior vena cava thrombosis, inferior vena cava penetration, filter migration, and filter fracture. There is a paucity of reports describing the technical aspects related to retrieval of Simon Nitinol filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of five patients with Simon Nitinol filters and describes the indication for retrieval, the retrieval techniques used to remove the filters, technical success, complications, and clinical course. RESULTS: The indications for retrieval included: abdominal pain (n = 2; 40%), iliocaval thrombosis (n = 1; 20%), identification of an intracardiac filter fragment (n = 1; 20%), and recurrent venous thromboembolic events (n = 1; 20%). Retrieval techniques included: biopsy forceps (n = 3; 60%), excimer laser extraction sheaths (n = 3; 60%), hangman modified loop snares (n = 3; 60%), rigid endobronchial forceps (n = 2; 40%), and balloon deflection (n = 2; 40%). All filters were successfully retrieved. One patient developed a post-procedural intramuscular hematoma near the site of right internal jugular sheath placement. CONCLUSIONS: Simon Nitinol filters may be retrieved safely and effectively using advanced inferior vena cava filter retrieval techniques.


Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Filtros de Veia Cava , Ligas , Remoção de Dispositivo , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Filtros de Veia Cava/efeitos adversos , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgia
2.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 46(2): 143-146, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236083

RESUMO

A 63-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a thoracic aortic aneurysm. We performed hybrid repair involving aortic arch debranching and endovascular stent-graft placement. Four months later, an asymptomatic pseudoaneurysm had formed at the aortic conduit-brachiocephalic artery anastomosis. To exclude the pseudoaneurysm, we deployed a Covered CP Stent across the anastomosis through a surgically created right axillary artery conduit. We discuss the patient's case and our choice of treatment.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Tronco Braquiocefálico/cirurgia , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Stents , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Aortografia , Tronco Braquiocefálico/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese
3.
Laryngoscope ; 121(10): 2095-9, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21898444

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the radiographic incidence of heterotopic ossification and the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification in a series of patients who underwent fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review at a university medical center. METHODS: Patient database of 520 consecutive fibula free flaps from 1995 to 2010 was reviewed to identify patients who had postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of the neck to further investigate the radiologic presence of heterotopic ossification. Patient chart review was also performed to identify patients who had clinical evidence of neck masses consistent with heterotopic ossification. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients who had postoperative CT scans available for radiologic assessment, 43 (65%) showed heterotopic ossification of the fibula periosteum. Clinically, 14 of 520 patients (2.6%) presented with firm, level I or II neck masses that proved to be secondary to heterotopic ossification. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a firm neck mass after treatment of head and neck cancer often indicates recurrent tumor. Heterotopic ossification has not been previously reported as a potential etiology of neck masses after fibula free flap oromandibular reconstruction in the head and neck surgery literature. The radiographic incidence of this phenomenon is high, and the clinical incidence of neck masses secondary to heterotopic ossification is low. Heterotopic ossification can be distinguished from recurrent tumor on the basis of physical examination, radiographic assessment, and/or fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Awareness of heterotopic ossification should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with a neck mass who have undergone fibula free flap reconstructions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Ossificação Heterotópica/diagnóstico , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Fíbula/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Boca/cirurgia , Pescoço/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossificação Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA