Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Hepatology ; 62(4): 1013-23, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26118427

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Alisporivir is a cyclophilin inhibitor with pan-genotypic anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) activity and a high barrier to viral resistance. The VITAL-1 study assessed alisporivir as interferon (IFN)-free therapy in treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3. Three hundred forty patients without cirrhosis were randomized to: arm 1, alisporivir (ALV) 1,000 mg once-daily (QD); arm 2, ALV 600 mg QD and ribavirin (RBV); arm 3, ALV 800 mg QD and RBV; arm 4, ALV 600 mg QD and pegylated IFN (Peg-IFN); or arm 5, Peg-IFN and RBV. Patients receiving IFN-free ALV regimens who achieved rapid virological response (RVR) continued the same treatment throughout, whereas those with detectable HCV RNA at week 4 received ALV, RBV, and Peg-IFN from weeks 6 to 24. Overall, 300 patients received ALV-based regimens. In arm 1 to arm 4, the intent-to-treat rates of sustained virological response (SVR) 24 weeks after treatment (SVR24) were from 80% to 85%, compared with 58% (n = 23 of 40) with Peg-IFN/RBV. Per-protocol analysis showed higher SVR24 rates in patients who received ALV/RBV, IFN-free after RVR (92%; n = 56 of 61) than with ALV alone after RVR (72%; n = 13 of 18) or with Peg-IFN/RBV (70%; n = 23 of 33). Both RVRs and SVRs to ALV IFN-free regimens were numerically higher in genotype 3- than in genotype 2-infected patients. Viral breakthrough was infrequent (3%; n = 7 of 258). IFN-free ALV treatment showed markedly better safety/tolerability than IFN-containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: ALV plus RBV represents an effective IFN-free option for a proportion of patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infections, with high SVR rates for patients with early viral clearance. Further investigations of ALV in IFN-free combination regimens with direct-acting antiviral drugs deserve exploration in future trials.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Ciclosporina/administração & dosagem , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Feminino , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/classificação , Hepacivirus/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem
2.
Clin Immunol ; 131(3): 415-25, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19303818

RESUMO

Plasma and cellular HCV RNA and core antigen were tested in monocyte-derived DC (MDDC) from chronic hepatitis C patients undergoing treatment with peg-interferon alpha2b/ribavirin. DC allostimulatory capacity, HCV-specific T-cell reactivity and IL-12 production were measured at baseline and treatment week (TW)12. Using DC and autologous CD4(+)T-cells, obtained at baseline and TW12, we performed cross-over experiments to determine the relative role of DC and/or T-cells for impaired immune reactivity to HCV. HCV RNA and HCV core plasma levels had an impact on DC phenotype and allostimulatory capacity. In contrast, HCV genome/core protein, although detectable in DC from some patients had no effect on DC function. Antiviral immunity at TW12 was not improved in patients who remained HCV RNA positive, while early viraemia clearance (TW12) improved antiviral responses. The cross-over experiment revealed that changes in DC, rather than CD4(+)T cells have a major role for enhanced anti-HCV responses.


Assuntos
Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Células Dendríticas/imunologia , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Viremia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antígenos Virais/sangue , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/metabolismo , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/virologia , Células Cultivadas , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Células Dendríticas/virologia , Feminino , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite C Crônica/imunologia , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Interleucina-12/biossíntese , Interleucina-12/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polietilenoglicóis , RNA Viral/sangue , Proteínas Recombinantes , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico
3.
J Infect Dis ; 196(7): 998-1005, 2007 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17763320

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 is the most prevalent genotype in Western countries, and treatment with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin fails in 50%-60% of patients. Genetic variability within the NS5A dsRNA-dependent protein kinase binding domain (PKRbd) of HCV-1b has been associated with responsiveness to IFN- alpha . Little is known about NS5A sequences of HCV-1a. We investigated whether genetic variability of HCV-1a NS5A correlates with the early HCV kinetics during treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four treatment-naive, HCV-1a-infected patients were treated with standard doses of pegIFN- alpha 2a plus ribavirin. HCV viremia was quantitated at days 0, 1, 2, and 3 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 of treatment. According to HCV kinetics, patients were classified as early rapid responders, early moderate responders, or early slow responders. The full-length HCV NS5A was sequenced at baseline and at week 1. RESULTS: At baseline, variability of the NS5A C terminus (concentrated in the PKRbd) is associated with interferon efficacy but not with the second phase of the early viral decline that has been associated with a sustained virologic response. Comparisons between baseline and week-1 full-length sequences did not show significant increases in mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variability of HCV-1a NS5A does not predict responsiveness to IFN- alpha . Differences in early kinetics during combination therapy are not due to selection of IFN-resistant HCV strains.


Assuntos
Antivirais , Variação Genética , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Interferon-alfa , Polietilenoglicóis , Ribavirina , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/genética , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/farmacologia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Viral , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/classificação , Hepacivirus/genética , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Interferon-alfa/farmacologia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Cinética , Modelos Biológicos , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Filogenia , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/farmacologia , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , RNA Viral/sangue , Proteínas Recombinantes , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/farmacologia , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Alinhamento de Sequência , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Resultado do Tratamento , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/química , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/metabolismo
4.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 4(2): 233-48, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16469685

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) involves a number of complex and controversial issues. Expert opinions may differ from those of practicing hepatologists and gastroenterologists. We aimed to explore this issue further after a critical review of the literature. METHODS: A panel of 14 international experts graded the strength of evidence for 16 statements addressing 3 content areas: patient selection, therapeutic end points, and treatment options. Available data relating to the statements were reviewed critically in 3 small work groups. After discussion of each statement with the entire panel, the experts voted anonymously to accept or reject statements based on the strength of evidence and their experience. A total of 241 members of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) responded to the same statements and their responses were compared with those of the experts. A discordant response was defined as a difference of more than 20% in any of the 5 graded levels of response (accept or reject) between the 2 groups. RESULTS: With the exception of 2 statements, the experts' responses were relatively uniform. However, the responses of the AASLD members were discordant from the experts in 12 statements, spanning all 3 content areas. CONCLUSIONS: Several areas of disagreement on the management of CHB exist between experts and AASLD members. Our results indicate a potential knowledge gap among practicing hepatologists. Better educational efforts are needed to meet the challenge of managing this complex disorder in which even expert opinion occasionally may disagree.


Assuntos
Hepatite B Crônica/terapia , Adenina/administração & dosagem , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Alanina Transaminase/sangue , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Biópsia , Competência Clínica , DNA Viral/análise , Progressão da Doença , Quimioterapia Combinada , Determinação de Ponto Final , Antígenos E da Hepatite B/análise , Vírus da Hepatite B/genética , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Interferons/uso terapêutico , Lamivudina/administração & dosagem , Fígado/patologia , Organofosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Seleção de Pacientes , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes , Sociedades Médicas , Replicação Viral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA