Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(1): 235-248, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36269468

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the impact of systemic medications and polypharmacy on unstimulated (UWS) and chewing-stimulated whole saliva (SWS) flow rates in patients with xerostomia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional multicenter study is based on data of patients referred to five oral medicine outpatient practices in Europe and USA from January 2000 and April 2014. Relevant demographic, social, medical history and current medications were collected. RESULTS: The study included 1144 patients, 972 (85%) females, with a mean (SD) age of 59 (14.1) years. In unmatched patients, the UWS flow rate was lower in patients taking a medication (vs. not taking a medication) from the following drug categories: opioid analgesics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antihypertensives, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, diuretics, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and hormones. There was a greater negative effect on SWS flow rate in patients taking (vs. not taking) anticonvulsants, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, and DMARDs. In matched patients, both UWS (0.22 vs. 0.19 ml/min; p = 0.03) and SWS (0.97 vs. 0.85 ml/min; p = .017) flow rates were higher in patients on non-opioid analgesics (vs. not taking). The UWS flow rate was lower in patients taking antidepressants (vs. not taking) (0.16 vs. 0.22 ml/min p = .002) and higher (and within normal range) in patients taking sex hormones (vs. not taking) (0.25 vs. 0.16 ml/min; p = .005). On the other hand, SWS was lower in patients taking corticosteroid (vs. not taking) (0.76 vs. 1.07 ml/min; p = .002), and in patients taking DMARDs (vs. not taking) (0.71 vs. 0.98 ml/min; p = .021). Finally, differences in medians of both UWS and SWS were statistically significant in patients taking 1 or more than 1 opioid analgesic (vs. not taking, p ≤ .0001 and p = .031, respectively), 1 or more than 1 anticonvulsants (vs. not taking, p = .008 and p = .007), 1 or more than 1 antidepressants (vs. not taking, p < .0001 for both), 1 or more than 1 DMARDs (vs. not taking, p = .042, and p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: A greater negative impact on UWS and SWS flow rates was seen in patients taking more than one medication from the same drug class. Intake of antidepressants, corticosteroids and DMARDs is associated with lower whole saliva flow rates. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Salivary flow rate can be modified by some specific medications, mostly by polypharmacy.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Xerostomia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anticonvulsivantes , Estudos Transversais , Saliva , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39115868

RESUMO

Importance: Nonrestorable teeth are recommended to be extracted prior to radiation therapy (RT). Occasionally, preradiation extractions introduce unacceptable delays in treatment initiation. Planned dental extractions immediately postradiation presents an alternative strategy, though outcomes are uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of dental extractions immediately postradiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study including patients planned for curative-intent RT but unable or unwilling to proceed with 1 or more extractions recommended pretreatment was carried out. From January 2020 to September 2022, 58 patients were screened and 50 enrolled. The dental care was performed at a single academic department and the cancer care at regional centers. Analysis took place between September 22, 2023, and June 10, 2024. Exposure: On completion of RT, patients were recommended to complete extractions as soon as feasible, and ideally within 4 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the actuarial cumulative incidence of exposed alveolar bone noted by any practitioner at any time after extraction, calculated using Gray method with death as a competing risk. As a pilot study, no formal power calculation was performed; resources allowed for 50 evaluable patients. Results: Among the 50 participants enrolled, RT was nonoperative for 32 patients (64%) and postoperative for 18 patients (36%). Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) was delivered in all patients. Of the 50 patients, 20 (40%) declined dental extractions immediately postradiation and the remaining 30 (60%) underwent a median (range) of 8.5 (1-28) extractions at a median (range) of 64.5 (13-152) days after RT. The median (IQR) follow-up for survivors without exposed bone was 26 (17-35) months from the end of RT. The 2-year cumulative incidence of any exposed bone was 27% (95% CI, 14%-40%). The 2-year incidence of exposed bone for those who underwent dental extractions immediately postradiation was 40% (95% CI, 22%-58%) and 7% (95% CI, 0%-22%) for those who did not. Of the 13 who developed exposed bone: 4 resolved, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 8 were confirmed as osteoradionecrosis. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that postradiation dental extractions incur considerable risk, even if performed within a 4-month window.

3.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 18(1): e28-e35, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34242067

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients with head and neck cancer are at risk of long-term dental complications. Proper dental assessment pre- and post-treatment can improve outcomes but is logistically challenging. We surveyed oncologists to better understand their perspectives surrounding dental care in this unique population. METHODS: We surveyed oncologists at institutions associated with an ongoing national study of oral health after treatment of head and neck cancer. Seventeen questions were used to assess provider characteristics, patterns of practice, patterns of referral, barriers to referral, and willingness to apply fluoride varnish in the oncology clinic. RESULTS: Ninety-seven oncologists were invited from six institutions, of whom 40 (41%) responded. Surgeons represented 45% of the sample, followed by radiation oncologists (40%) and medical oncologists (15%). Both generalists and subspecialists were included. All practiced in a metropolitan area with an academic dental practice, and many felt that this improved access to care. Despite this, most oncologists thought that financial factors were a significant barrier to obtaining timely dental care. Most oncologists performed a dental assessment during visits. Oncologists felt qualified to identify the most significant complications of treatment, such as exposed bone, but felt underqualified to identify early changes in need of intervention. When asked if the oncology clinic could apply fluoride varnish during follow-ups, most stated that this seemed feasible but would require education and financial support. CONCLUSION: Oncologists often perform limited dental evaluations during their routine visits. Given the challenges associated with access to proper dental care for this population, these oncology visits may provide a window for preventative intervention.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Oncologistas , Assistência Odontológica , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Oncologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am ; 26(1): 111-5, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24287199

RESUMO

Sjögren's syndrome is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that can affect any organ system in the body. The most common symptoms are dryness of the mouth and eyes resulting from chronic inflammation and a progressive loss of secretory function. As with most individuals managing a chronic condition, patients with Sjögren's are on a multipronged path to disease and symptom management. Various coping strategies are presented in this article and the advantages and disadvantages discussed. Additionally, how a support group functions and practical guidance for the initiation of a Sjögren's support group are discussed.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Síndrome de Sjogren/psicologia , Apoio Social , Humanos , Internet , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20303053

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study determined the profile of the oral bacterial flora in an outpatient cancer population before and after chemotherapy using molecular techniques. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited 9 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients scheduled for induction chemotherapy. All were seen immediately before chemotherapy, and 7 to 14 days later. At both visits, we performed oral evaluations and obtained mucositis grading (with the World Health Organization [WHO] scale), absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), and bacterial samples from the buccal mucosa. Bacterial DNA was isolated, and 16S ribosomal RNA gene clonal libraries were constructed. Sequences of genes in the library were used to determine species identity by comparison to known sequences. RESULTS: After chemotherapy, WHO scores of 0 and 1 were in 3 and 6 patients, respectively, and mean ANC (+/-SD) dropped from 3326 +/- 463 to 1091 +/- 1082 cells/mm(3). From pre- and post-chemotherapy samples, 41 species were detected, with a predominance of Gemella haemolysans and Streptococcus mitis. More than 85% of species have not been previously identified in chemotherapy patients. Seven species appeared exclusively before chemotherapy and 25 after chemotherapy. After chemotherapy, the number of species per patient increased by a mean of 2.6 (SD = 4.7, P = .052). CONCLUSION: We identified species not previously identified in chemotherapy patients. Our results suggest a shift to a more complex oral bacterial profile in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Bucal/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Bactérias/classificação , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Cárie Dentária/classificação , Índice de Placa Dentária , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gengivite/classificação , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Biologia Molecular , Neutrófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Higiene Bucal , Periodontite/classificação , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Staphylococcaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcaceae/isolamento & purificação , Estomatite/induzido quimicamente , Estomatite/microbiologia , Streptococcus/classificação , Streptococcus mitis/efeitos dos fármacos , Streptococcus mitis/isolamento & purificação , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação
6.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 140(10): 1238-44, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19797553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) often is caused by bacteria that colonize teeth. The authors conducted a study to determine if poor oral hygiene or dental disease are risk factors for developing bacteremia after toothbrushing or single-tooth extraction. METHODS: One hundred ninety-four participants in a study were in either a toothbrushing group or a single-tooth extraction with placebo group. The authors assessed the participants' oral hygiene, gingivitis and periodontitis statuses. They assayed blood samples obtained before, during and after the toothbrushing or extraction interventions for IE-associated bacteria. RESULTS: The authors found that oral hygiene and gingival disease indexes were associated significantly with IE-related bacteremia after toothbrushing. Participants with mean plaque and calculus scores of 2 or greater were at a 3.78- and 4.43-fold increased risk of developing bacteremia, respectively. The presence of generalized bleeding after toothbrushing was associated with an almost eightfold increase in risk of developing bacteremia. There was no significant association between any of the measures of periodontal disease and the incidence of bacteremia after toothbrushing. The oral hygiene or disease status of a tooth was not significantly associated with bacteremia after its extraction. CONCLUSION: Bacteremia after toothbrushing is associated with poor oral hygiene and gingival bleeding after toothbrushing. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Improvements in oral hygiene may reduce the risk of developing IE.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/etiologia , Placa Dentária/complicações , Endocardite Bacteriana/etiologia , Higiene Bucal , Escovação Dentária/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Cálculos Dentários/complicações , Índice de Placa Dentária , Método Duplo-Cego , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gengivite/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Higiene Oral , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estreptococos Viridans/isolamento & purificação , Adulto Jovem
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19101489

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Invasive dental procedures are often indicated before cardiac valve surgery. The purpose of this case-control study was to determine the risks and benefits of concomitant dental and thoracic surgery. METHODS: Critically ill cardiac inpatients requiring cardiac valve surgery were referred by the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery to our Oral Medicine consult service. Those requiring dental extractions were considered for dental treatment during the same general anesthetic as the cardiac surgery. These study patients were compared with control patients who had extractions before valve surgery in a different setting. There was no attempt to analyze the impact of this practice on the development of infective endocarditis. All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics during dental surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients had concomitant oral and cardiac valve surgery. Seventeen patients were in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls in demographics, length of stay, nature of the dental surgery, mean number of teeth removed, oral bleeding, or postoperative infections. One patient in the control group developed prosthetic valve endocarditis versus none in the concomitant surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: This case-control study suggests that concomitant surgical procedures for dental and valvular heart disease can be accomplished without clinically significant oral complications. Given the risk from poor oral health following cardiac valve surgery, this approach should be considered for patients who would benefit by avoiding a second general anesthetic and/or a delay in cardiac surgery, and by having their oral surgery performed in the safest environment.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Support Care Cancer ; 16(3): 305-9, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17965892

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of trismus in patients who had previously received curative doses of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. In addition, we assessed if trismus was associated with quality of life deficits and radiation toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February, 2005 and December, 2006, 40 patients with histologically confirmed head and neck cancer who had received curative doses of RT to the area(s) of the masticatory muscles and/or the ligaments of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) were enrolled in this study. Differences in trismus incidence were compared between cancer treatment modalities [i.e., RT vs RT/chemotherapy (CT) and conventional RT vs intensity modulated RT]. Quality of life (QOL) was measured by using four questions from the EORTC QLQ-C30 that address pain and difficulty opening the jaw. Scores regarding impaired eating as a result of decreased range of motion of the mouth were derived from the Modified Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE Version 3.0). RESULTS: Trismus was identified in 45% of subjects who had received curative doses of RT. No differences were noted in the incidence of trismus between RT and RT/CT or between conventional RT and intensity modulated RT (IMRT). Those with trismus demonstrated more QOL deficits than the non-trismus group. CONCLUSIONS: Curative doses of RT for head and neck cancer result in trismus in a high percentage of patients, independent of other treatment modalities. Trismus has a negative impact on quality of life in this population.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Trismo/etiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Trismo/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA