Inhibitory Activity of Antibacterial Mouthwashes and Antiseptic Substances against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Improved treatment and prevention strategies, such as antimicrobial mouthwashes, may be important for addressing the public health threat of antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Here, we describe the activity of seven common antibacterial mouthwashes and antiseptics against N. gonorrhoeae isolates, incorporating the use of a human saliva test matrix. Our data demonstrate that antibacterial mouthwashes and antiseptics vary in their ability to inhibit the in vitro growth of N. gonorrhoeae and saliva may impact this inhibitory activity.

An inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy children.

BACKGROUND: Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a major cause of hand, foot, and mouth disease in children and may be fatal. A vaccine against EV71 is needed. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial involving healthy children 6 to 71 months of age in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Two doses of an inactivated EV71 vaccine or placebo were administered intramuscularly, with a 4-week interval between doses, and children were monitored for up to 11 months. The primary end point was protection against hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by EV71. RESULTS: A total of 12,000 children were randomly assigned to receive vaccine or placebo. Serum neutralizing antibodies were assessed in 549 children who received the vaccine. The seroconversion rate was 100% 4 weeks after the two vaccinations, with a geometric mean titer of 170.6. Over the course of two epidemic seasons, the vaccine efficacy was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.9 to 99.0) according to the intention-to-treat analysis and 97.3% (95% CI, 92.6 to 99.0) according to the per-protocol analysis. Adverse events, such as fever (which occurred in 41.6% of the participants who received vaccine vs. 35.2% of those who received placebo), were significantly more common in the week after vaccination among children who received the vaccine than among those who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The inactivated EV71 vaccine elicited EV71-specific immune responses and protection against EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease. (Funded by the National Basic Research Program and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01569581.).

[Study on the safety and immunogenicity of MF59-adjuvanted influenza subunit vaccine in Chinese elderly].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and immunogenicity between a MF59-adjuvanted influenza subunit vaccine and a conventional non-adjuvanted influenza subunit vaccine. METHODS: A randomized, blind-designed controlled study was carried out, with 600 subjects (> or = 60 years of age) received MF59-adjuvanted influenza subunit vaccine (FLUAD, n = 400) or conventional non-adjuvanted influenza subunit vaccine (Agrippal, n = 200) respectively. The local and systemic reactions were observed on 0-7 days after vaccination. Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers of pre-and post-vaccination were detected by the HI assay. Seroconversion (4-fold increase) rate of subjects was calculated using baseline data when it was under naive level, and the protection rate when HI titer achieving the level of protection (> or = 1:40) after vaccination. Geometric mean titer (GMT) and its increasing folds were calculated. Differences between safety and immunogenicity were also calculated. RESULTS: The local and systemic reaction rates were similar between both groups, but the duration in injection site was frequent for Agrippal (P < 0.05), while mild pain and fever in injection site were frequent for FLUAD. On immunogenicity test, for those subjects whose baseline was under naive level while the seroconversion rate against A/H3N2 viral strain after vaccination--FLUAD was significantly higher than Agrippal (P < 0.001). Aside from A/H1N1 viral strain, the rate of protection on both groups were significantly higher than those from baseline data, but for A/H3N2 viral strain, FLUAD was significantly higher than Agrippal (P < 0.001). GMT was higher than baseline (P < 0.001) after both groups being vaccinated but FLUAD group was significantly higher than Agrippal group. CONCLUSION: FLUAD was well tolerated by Chinese elderly and its immunogenicity level induced by FLUAD was higher than that of Agrippal, showing that it would benefit the elderly with hypoimmunity.