A Comparative Study on the Performance of Inert and Functionalized Spheres Coated with Solid Dispersions Made of Two Structurally Related Antifungal Drugs.

Fluid bed coating offers potential advantages as a formulation platform for amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) of poorly soluble drugs, being a one-step manufacturing process which could reduce the risk of phase separation associated with multiple step manufacturing approaches. However, the impact of the physicochemical nature of nonpareil carriers on the properties and drug release from the ASDs has not been studied in detail. In this work, tartaric acid (TAP) and microcrystalline cellulose (CEL) spheres were chosen as examples of functional and inert beads, respectively. Two structurally related triazole antifungals, itraconazole (ITR) and posaconazole (POS), were chosen as model drugs. Solid-state investigations revealed that the fluidized bed process result in both types of spheres uniformly coated with ITR and POS ASDs based on Eudragit L100-55 (EUD). A single glass transition temperature (Tg) was determined for each of the ASDs. Infrared studies suggested the presence of a weak interaction between POS and TAP, which translated into premature release of POS from the POS/EUD ASD coated TAP spheres in FaSSGF and subsequently lower POS cumulative release in comparison to the ASD coated on CEL beads. High resolution investigations of morphological and compositional changes during dissolution, using scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy coupled with nanoscale thermal investigation, revealed that crystallization of the drug from the ASDs was induced during dissolution when TAP spheres were used as carriers. In contrast, ASDs coated on CEL underwent phase separation and drug-rich nanospecies were formed in the matrix due to the solubility gap between the drug and EUD in FaSSIF. This study demonstrates that properties of carrier for the ASD fundamentally affect the drug release properties and the proper selection of carrier beads is critical to ensure product quality.

Engineering of pharmaceutical cocrystals in an excipient matrix: Spray drying versus hot melt extrusion.

The comparison of spray drying versus hot melt extrusion (HME) in order to formulate amorphous solid dispersions has been widely studied. However, to the best of our knowledge, the use of both techniques to form cocrystals within a carrier excipient has not previously been compared. The combination of ibuprofen (IBU) and isonicotinamide (INA) in a 1:1 M ratio was used as a model cocrystal. A range of pharmaceutical excipients was selected for processing - mannitol, xylitol, Soluplus and PVP K15. The ratio of cocrystal components to excipient was altered to assess the ratios at which cocrystal formation occurs during spray drying and HME. Hansen Solubility Parameter (HSP) and the difference in HSP between the cocrystal and excipient (ΔHSP) was employed as a tool to predict cocrystal formation. During spray drying, when the difference in HSP between the cocrystal and the excipient was large, as in the case of mannitol (ΔHSP of 18.3 MPa0.5), a large amount of excipient (up to 50%) could be incorporated without altering the integrity of the cocrystal, whereas for Soluplus and PVP K15, where the ΔHSP was 2.1 and 1.6 MPa0.5 respectively, the IBU:INA cocrystal alone was only formed at a very low weight ratio of excipient, i.e. cocrystal:excipient 90:10. Remarkably different results were obtained in HME. In the case of Soluplus and PVP K15, a mixture of cocrystal with single components (IBU and INA) was obtained even when only 10% excipient was included. In conclusion, in order to reduce the number of unit operations required to produce a final pharmaceutical product, spray drying showed higher feasibility over HME to produce cocrystals within a carrier excipient.

An Acoustic-Based Method to Detect and Quantify the Effect of Exhalation into a Dry Powder Inhaler.

BACKGROUND: Dry powder inhaler (DPI) users frequently exhale into their inhaler mouthpiece before the inhalation step. This error in technique compromises the integrity of the drug and results in poor bronchodilation. This study investigated the effect of four exhalation factors (exhalation flow rate, distance from mouth to inhaler, exhalation duration, and relative air humidity) on dry powder dose delivery. Given that acoustic energy can be related to the factors associated with exhalation sounds, we then aimed to develop a method of identifying and quantifying this critical inhaler technique error using acoustic based methods. METHODS: An in vitro test rig was developed to simulate this critical error. The effect of the four factors on subsequent drug delivery were investigated using multivariate regression models. In a further study we then used an acoustic monitoring device to unobtrusively record the sounds 22 asthmatic patients made whilst using a Diskus(™) DPI. Acoustic energy was employed to automatically detect and analyze exhalation events in the audio files. RESULTS: All exhalation factors had a statistically significant effect on drug delivery (p<0.05); distance from the inhaler mouthpiece had the largest effect size. Humid air exhalations were found to reduce the fine particle fraction (FPF) compared to dry air. In a dataset of 110 audio files from 22 asthmatic patients, the acoustic method detected exhalations with an accuracy of 89.1%. We were able to classify exhalations occurring 5 cm or less in the direction of the inhaler mouthpiece or recording device with a sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 85.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Exhaling into a DPI has a significant detrimental effect. Acoustic based methods can be employed to objectively detect and analyze exhalations during inhaler use, thus providing a method of remotely monitoring inhaler technique and providing personalized inhaler technique feedback.