Treatment effects of functional appliances in children with Class II malocclusion with and without morphologic deviations in the upper spine.

INTRODUCTION: This research aimed to compare treatment effects of functional appliances between children with and without morphologic deviations in the upper spine and analyze associations between Atlas dimensions and the short- and long-term treatment effects. METHODS: Sixty-eight prepubertal or pubertal children (35 boys and 33 girls; mean age, 11.47 ± 1.39 years) treated with Class II functional appliances were included. Lateral cephalograms were taken at pretreatment (T1), postfunctional appliance treatment (T2), and after retention at postpuberty (T3). Upper spine morphology and Atlas dimensions were evaluated at T1. T1-T2 and T1-T3 lateral cephalograms were superimposed using a structural method. Changes in the jaws were compared with multiple linear regression analysis between children with and without deviations in the upper spine. Associations between the changes and Atlas dimensions were analyzed by partial correlation. RESULTS: Children with morphologic deviations in the upper spine showed significantly more backward rotation of the mandible (P <0.01) and increased inclination of the jaws (P <0.05, P <0.01) from T1-T2 and significantly smaller condylar growth (P <0.01) from T1-T3 compared with children without the deviations. Atlas height was significantly associated with vertical and rotational changes in the mandible (P <0.01) from T1-T2 and condylar growth (P <0.05) from T1-T2 and T1-T3. CONCLUSIONS: Morphologic deviations in the upper spine and low Atlas height were significantly associated with smaller condylar growth induced by functional appliances in the long term. Upper spine morphology and the Atlas dimension may be valuable in phenotypic differentiation in children with Class II malocclusion for optimal treatment outcome.

Ethnic differences in craniofacial and upper spine morphology between European and Asian children with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to analyze differences in craniofacial and upper cervical spine morphology, including posterior cranial fossa and growth prediction signs between European and Asian skeletal Class III children, and to analyze associations between morphologic deviations in the upper cervical spine and craniofacial characteristics. METHODS: A total of 60 skeletal Class III children, 19 Danes and 41 Koreans, were included. Upper spine morphology, Atlas dimensions, and craniofacial morphology, including posterior cranial fossa and growth prediction signs, were assessed on lateral cephalograms. Differences and associations were analyzed by multiple linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS: In the craniofacial morphology, the inclination of the maxilla (NSL/NL, P <0.05) and the shape of the posterior cranial fossa (s-d, d-p, p-iop; P <0.01 and P <0.0001, respectively) were significantly different between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in upper cervical spine morphology and Atlas dimensions between the groups. Fusion was significantly associated with the sagittal jaw relationship (P <0.05), and the total upper spine deviations were significantly associated with some growth prediction signs (P <0.05, P <0.01). Atlas dimensions were significantly associated with the prognathia of the mandible (P <0.05), posterior cranial fossa (P <0.01, P <0.0001), and some growth prediction signs (P <0.05, P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Upper spine morphology and Atlas dimensions may provide valuable information for predicting jaw growth and craniofacial morphology in Class III malocclusion.

Evaluation of growth changes induced by functional appliances in children with Class II malocclusion: Superimposition of lateral cephalograms on stable structures.

OBJECTIVE: To compare short- and long-term dentoalveolar, skeletal, and rotational changes evaluated by Björk's structural method of superimposition between children with Class II malocclusion treated by functional appliances and untreated matched controls. METHODS: Seventy-nine prepubertal or pubertal children (mean age, 11.57 ± 1.40 years) with Class II malocclusion were included. Thirty-four children were treated using an activator with a high-pull headgear (Z-activator), while 28 were treated using an activator without a headgear (E-activator). Seventeen untreated children were included as controls. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before treatment (T1), after functional appliance treatment (T2), and after retention in the postpubertal phase (T3). Changes from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 were compared between the treated groups and control group using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Relative to the findings in the control group at T2, the sagittal jaw relationship (subspinale-nasion- pogonion, p < 0.001), maxillary prognathism (sella-nasion-subspinale, p < 0.05), and condylar growth (p < 0.001) exhibited significant improvements in the Z- and E-activator groups, which also showed a significantly increased maxillary incisor retraction (p < 0.001) and decreased overjet (p < 0.001). Only the E-activator group exhibited significant backward rotation of the maxilla at T2 (p < 0.01). The improvements in the sagittal jaw relationship (p < 0.01) and dental relationship (p < 0.001) remained significant at T3. Condylar growth and jaw rotations were not significant at T3. CONCLUSIONS: Functional appliance treatment in children with Class II malocclusion can significantly improve the sagittal jaw relationship and dental relationships in the long term.

Ethnic differences in craniofacial and upper spine morphology in children with skeletal Class II malocclusion.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze differences in upper cervical spine and craniofacial morphology, including posterior cranial fossa and growth prediction signs, between Danish and South Korean pre-orthodontic skeletal Class II children and to analyze associations between upper cervical spine morphology and craniofacial characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-six skeletal Class II children-93 Danes (54 boys and 39 girls, mean age 12.2 years) and 53 Koreans (27 boys and 26 girls, mean age 10.8 years)-were included. Upper spine morphology, Atlas dimensions, and craniofacial morphology, including posterior cranial fossa and growth prediction signs, were assessed on lateral cephalograms. Differences and associations were analyzed by multiple linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS: Significant differences between the ethnic groups were found in the sagittal and vertical craniofacial dimensions ( P < .001), mandibular shape ( P < .01), dental relationship ( P < .01), posterior cranial fossa ( P < .05), and growth prediction signs ( P < .001). No significant differences were found in upper spine morphology and Atlas dimensions between the groups. Upper spine morphology/dimensions were significantly associated with the cranial base angle ( P < .01), sagittal craniofacial dimensions ( P < .001), posterior cranial fossa ( P < .001), and growth prediction signs ( P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Upper spine morphology/dimensions may be valuable as predictive factors in treatment planning for growing Class II children.