Clinical and immunological features of chronic ulcerative stomatitis: A systematic review.

Chronic ulcerative stomatitis (CUS) is a rare disease of the mucous membranes with characteristics similar to other autoimmune diseases. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to recover all reported cases of CUS in order to summarize what are the clinical, demographic, microscopic, immunological features of CUS and its therapeutic response to different drugs. A systematic review of the literature was carried out following the statements of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The searches were performed in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, LILACS, Opengrey, and Google scholar. Inclusion criteria were articles or abstracts reporting at least one case with a final diagnosis of CUS. A total of 696 records were identified through databases, and 25 studies were selected reporting 81 cases. CUS affects more females (92%), and a greater number of cases are reported in Caucasian patients (53%). The age of patients ranged from 20 to 86 years with a mean age of 60 years (±13.86), and 15% of cases reported concomitantly skin lesions. The clinical and histopathological characteristics of CUS are very similar to those of oral lichen planus. The direct immunofluorescence (DIF) remains the gold-standard diagnostic resource and was performed in 69 cases, revealing a dotted pattern of deposition of stratified epithelium-specific antibodies (SES-ANA). The serum of 38 patients was collected for the performance of the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), and the use of epithelial substrates such as monkey and guinea pig esophagus often resulted in positive SES-ANA IgG. Most patients were treated with antimalarials, and the treatment of choice that proved to be effective is hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). This entity must be considered in the differential diagnosis of other autoimmune diseases, as it may be underreported.

Reação liquenoide oral ao amálgama: uma lesão ainda vista / Oral lichenoid reaction to amalgam: a lesion still seen

O amálgama dental ainda é amplamente utilizado na prática odontológica, apesar do acordo assinado na Convenção de Minamata, na qual 140 países comprometeram-se a reduzir o uso do mercúrio. O uso desse material restaurador pode desencadear reações liquenoides orais (RLO) cujas lesões apresentam semelhanças clínicas e histológicas com líquen plano oral (LPO), dificultando o diagnóstico. Aqui relatamos o caso de uma paciente do sexo feminino, de 72 anos, que foi encaminhada com uma lesão na mucosa bucal esquerda, com 10 meses de evolução e queixa de dor. A lesão era adjacente ao segundo molar inferior esquerdo que tinha uma restauração de amálgama. A paciente não apresentava doença sistêmica ou hábitos deletérios e não estava usando drogas continuamente. O diagnóstico clínico presuntivo foi RLO versus LPO. Sessenta dias após a substituição da restauração do amálgama, observou-se a regressão completa da lesão e o diagnóstico final de RLO foi realizado. A avaliação clínica associada aos resultados obtidos após a substituição do material suspeito pode ser suficiente para estabelecer o diagnóstico, embora em alguns casos seja necessária a avaliação histopatológica.

Dental amalgam is still widely used in dental practice, despite the agreement signed at the Minamata Convention, in which 140 countries have committed to reducing the use of mercury. The use of this restorative material may trigger oral lichenoid reactions (OLR) whose lesions show clinical and histological similarities with oral lichen planus (OLP), making diagnosis difficult. Here we report the case of a female patient, 72-year-old, who was referred with a lesion in the left buccal mucosa, with 10 months of evolution and complaint of pain. The lesion was adjacent to the second lower left molar which had an amalgam restoration. The patient had no systemic disease or deleterious habits and was not using drugs continuously. The presumptive clinical diagnosis were OLR versus OLP. Sixty days after the replacement of amalgam restoration the complete regression of the lesion was observed and the final diagnosis of OLR was done. Clinical assessment associated with the results obtained after the replacement of suspect material may be sufficient to establish the diagnosis, although in some cases it may be necessary histopathological evaluation.