Ecofriendly poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) microbeads for sanitary products.

In the past, plastic microbeads (MBs) were added to personal healthcare products to improve the cleaning and exfoliating effects, but these have been withdrawn owing to their non-degradable nature and contribution to the pollution of marine environment, especially that caused by the adsorption of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) on MBs. Therefore, natural biodegradable alternatives are being developed, but these often do not exhibit sufficient performance to replace non-degradable MBs. In this study, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) (P3HB-4HB), a biodegradable aliphatic polyester, was used to prepare MBs via melt-electrospraying. We carried out the rheological characterization of P3HB-4HB with respect to melting temperature, and the melt-electrospray process was optimized to prepare MBs having sizes similar to those of commercially available MBs. Furthermore, the adsorption properties of the P3HB-4HB MBs for POPs were investigated. Unlike commercial MBs, the P3HB-4HB MBs adsorbed significantly fewer contaminants owing to their smooth and regular surfaces. Finally, a cleansing product containing P3HB-4HB MBs was prepared to evaluate their cleaning ability, and we found that the MB-based product could remove dirt and contaminants that were not easily removed by water alone. Thus, the biodegradable P3HB-4HB MBs have great potential for use as sustainable additives for cosmetic products for skin exfoliation.

Can drug-induced sleep endoscopy improve the success rates of tongue base surgery?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the therapeutic value of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) by comparing the outcomes of tongue base surgery based on Muller's maneuver (MM) and those based on DISE in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. METHODS: Ninety-five patients who underwent the tongue base surgery in combination with palatal surgery for OSA at a tertiary referral hospital between March 2012 and March 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective comparative study. Forty-seven patients underwent MM for surgical decision and 48 patients underwent DISE in addition to MM for surgical decision. Surgical success was defined according to the Sher criteria (postoperative apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] < 20/h and ≥ 50% reduction in preoperative AHI), and AHI improvement (%) was defined as (preoperative AHI-postoperative AHI) × 100/preoperative AHI. For comparison between the MM and DISE groups, p-values were calculated using independent or paired t-tests for continuous variables and using chi-square test for categorical variables. RESULTS: By comparing the results of MM and DISE, consensus on the tongue base level showed insignificant concordance (kappa = 0.017, p = 0.865), whereas that on the oropharynx level showed fair agreement (kappa =0.241, p = 0.005). AHI, supine AHI, rapid eyeball movement (REM) AHI, non-REM AHI, and nadir oxygen saturation were all significantly improved after the tongue base surgery in both groups. The MM group showed a significant improvement in the Epworth sleepiness scale after the tongue base surgery (p = 0.014), whereas the DISE group did not (p = 0.165). However, there was no significant difference in the AHI improvement (MM group = 47.0 ± 32.0, DISE group = 48.3 ± 35.4, p = 0.852) and surgical success (MM group = 42.6%, DISE group = 45.8%, p = 0.748) between the groups. Tonsil grade (p < 0.05) and occlusion at the oropharynx lateral wall (p = 0.031) were significantly related to surgical success in the MM group. CONCLUSIONS: In the judgment of the tongue base surgery, MM and DISE findings showed poor agreement. DISE might affect the surgical decision on the tongue base surgery in OSA patients; however, there was a lack of evidence regarding the superiority of DISE over MM with respect to the surgical outcomes.