High Risk of Neck-liner Impingement and Notching Observed with Thick Femoral Neck Implants in Ceramic-on-ceramic THA.

BACKGROUND: Recently, impingement between the femoral stem and ceramic liner, which appears as a notch in the stem neck on radiographs, has emerged as a new complication. However, the proportion of impingement, potential risk factors, and related complications are poorly elucidated. QUESTION/PURPOSES: In patients who underwent ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THA and had at least 10 years of follow-up, we asked: (1) What proportion had radiographic evidence of stem neck-ceramic liner impingement (notching of the stem), and what implant design, implantation factors, or complications such as ceramic fracture or metallosis are associated with impingement? (2) How common are the complications of noise and ceramic fracture? (3) What are the radiologic changes (including fixation of femoral and acetabular components, osteolysis, and heterotopic ossification) and clinical outcomes as determined by the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) for this cohort? (4) What is the survivorship with implant revision as the endpoint and with reoperation for any reason as the endpoint after CoC THA using a thick-neck stem design? METHODS: Between May 2003 and April 2010, 643 patients underwent primary THA at a tertiary referral hospital. After excluding patients with metal-on-polyethylene and with ceramic-on-polyethylene implants, 621 patients were considered eligible for this study. All patients received the same hemispherical titanium cup, a standard-length tapered titanium stem, and a CoC bearing. Of those, 19% (115) were lost to follow-up before 10 years, and 8% (50) were excluded because they died before the minimum follow-up duration of 10 years, leaving 73% (456) for analysis. Patients had a mean age of 50 ± 14 years and were followed for a median (range) of 13 years (10 to 17). The mean cup abduction was 38° ± 5°, and the mean cup anteversion was 26° ± 7°. To determine the proportion of patients with the neck-liner impingement, we analyzed the plain radiographs of every patient during follow-up to detect notches around the stem. The detection of stem neck notches on the radiographs was reliable (intraobserver reliability: κ = 0.963; p < 0.001 and interobserver reliability: κ = 0.975; p < 0.001). To evaluate factors related to notching, we compared the possible confounding factors including gender, age, BMI, implant position, neck length, and head diameter. Complications such as ceramic fracture, noise, dislocation, and periprosthetic joint infection were recorded. Noise was evaluated via interview and with the Hip Noise Assessment Questionnaire, which assessed the noise qualitatively. For clinical outcome, we assessed the mHHS, which includes pain and function scales (0 [worst] to 100 [best]), every visit. Tilting of at least 4° or migration of at least 4 mm was the criteria for cup loosening; subsidence more than 3 mm, any change in position, or a continuous radiolucent line greater than 2 mm was the criteria for stem loosening. To evaluate osteolysis, we performed CT scans in 57% (262 of 456) of patients. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using the endpoints of survivorship free from implant revision and survivorship free from reoperation for any cause. RESULTS: The proportion of stem neck notching was 11% (49 of 456). There were no differences in cup abduction and anteversion between hips with notches and those without notches. Notched hips were more likely to have 28-mm than 32-mm heads (90% [44 of 49] versus 70% [285 of 407]; odds ratio 3.77 [95% CI 1.46 to 9.73]; p = 0.004). None of the 49 notched hips had a ceramic head or liner fracture or evidence of metallosis. A ceramic head fracture was reported in 2% (9 of 456); all fractures occurred in 28-mm short neck heads. A ceramic liner fracture occurred in 0.2% (1 of 456), and noise was noted in 6% (27 of 456). Acetabular osteolysis developed in 2% (7 of 456). The mHHS was 91 ± 12 points at the final follow-up. The survivorship free from implant revision was 97% (95% CI 96% to 99%), and the survivorship free from reoperation for any cause was 96% (95% CI 95% to 98%) at 13 years. CONCLUSION: The proportion of stems with neck-ceramic liner impingement and ceramic component fracture were unacceptably high after the use of a thick-neck stem design, especially when a 28-mm head was used. We have discontinued the use of this stem design and we recommend that such stems should not be used when CoC bearings are used. As these findings might be generalized to other bearing couples, further studies focused on polyethylene liner wear and local metallosis due to thick stem neck are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Long-Term Wear-Related Complications of Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners have been developed to address the wear-related problems associated with conventional polyethylene (CPE) such as osteolysis or aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this systematic meta-analysis, we compared the long-term efficacy in preventing radiological osteolysis and revision surgery between HXLPE and CPE. METHODS: We included 14 studies that compared HXLPE and CPE reporting the incidence of wear-related complications with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. We investigated 5 wear-related complications: osteolysis, excessive wear, linear wear rate, revision surgery due to wear, and progress of osteolysis/aseptic loosening. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis to estimate odds ratio (OR) and a proportional meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of each complication. RESULTS: Among 1,175 THAs, 220 osteolysis and 78 wear-related revisions were detected. The use of HXLPE reduced the risk of overall osteolysis (OR 0.30; P = .001), excessive wear (OR 0.10; P < .001), linear wear rate (weighted mean difference 0.09; P < .001), the risk of overall wear-related revisions (OR 0.06; P < .001), and revisions due to aseptic loosening (OR 0.23; P = .015). As per the proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of osteolysis, excessive wear, and the overall wear-related revision rate were 14%, 8%, and 3% in HXLPE and 25%, 33%, and 20% in CPE, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current evidence shows that HXLPE dramatically reduced the rate of osteolysis and wear-related revision surgery. However, as polyethylene wear and osteolysis still lead to revision surgery, ongoing clinical and retrieval studies are required to analyze long-term outcomes.

Mitigating polyethylene-mediated periprosthetic tissue inflammation through MEDSAH-grafting.

Periprosthetic tissue inflammation is a challenging complication arising in joint replacement surgeries, which is often caused by wear debris from polyethylene (PE) components. In this study, we examined the potential biological effects of grafting a [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl)ammonium hydroxide (MEDSAH) polymer onto the surface of PE through a solvent-evaporation technique. J774A.1 macrophage-like cells and primary cultured mouse osteoblasts were treated with PE powder with or without the MEDSAH coating. MEDSAH grafting on PE substantially reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and other mediators in primary cultured mouse osteoblasts, but did not significantly impact macrophage-mediated inflammation. Our findings suggest that a MEDSAH coating on PE-based materials has potential utility in mitigating periprosthetic tissue inflammation and osteolysis and preventing aseptic loosening in total joint replacements. Further research, including large-scale clinical trials and biomechanical analyses, is needed to assess the long-term performance and clinical implications of MEDSAH-coated PE-based materials in total joint arthroplasty.

Cemented versus Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: A Study Based on National Claim Data in South Korea.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of revision, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) between patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) undergoing noncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) and cemented THA using a national claim data in South Korea. METHODS: We identified patients who received THA for ONFH from January 2007 to December 2018 using ICD diagnosis codes and procedural codes. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the fixation method: with or without cement. The survivorship of THA was calculated using the following end points: revision of both the cup and stem, revision of the single component, any type of revision, PJI, and PPF. RESULTS: A total of 40,606 patients: 3,738 patients (9.2%) with cement and 36,868 patients (90.7%) without cement, received THA for ONFH. The mean age of the noncemented fixation group (56.2 ± 13.2 years) was significantly lower than that of the cemented fixation group (57.0 ± 15.7 years, P = 0.003). The risk of revision and PJI was notably higher in cemented THA (hazard ratio: 1.44 [1.21 to 1.72] and 1.66 [1.36 to 2.04], respectively). Noncemented THA had a higher 12-year survivorship compared with cemented THA with any revision and PJI as the end point. DISCUSSION: Noncemented fixation had better survivorship than cemented fixation in patients with ONFH.