Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cardiol Clin ; 38(4): 639-647, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33036724

RESUMO

Since their introduction in clinical practice in 1986, different types of coronary stents have been developed and become available for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent thrombosis (ST) is an uncommon but harmful complication after percutaneous coronary implantation, with a high occurrence of acute myocardial infarction and risk of mortality. Among several procedural and clinical predictors, the type of coronary stent is a strong determinant of ST. This article reviews the available evidence on the most used coronary stent types in the modern era and the related risk of ST.


Assuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis , Stents Farmacológicos , Stents , Trombose/etiologia , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Polímeros , Desenho de Prótese , Stents/efeitos adversos
2.
Int J Cardiol ; 268: 68-74, 2018 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30041805

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little data are available on the long-term outcomes of bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study is to investigate three-years outcomes and predictors of BRS failure in patients presenting with STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two prospective, single-arm registries were pooled. Incidence and predictors of clinical outcome were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. From May-2012 to January-2015, 183 STEMI patients (58 ±â€¯13 years, 77% males, 29% diabetics) who received a total of 256 BRS (1.4 ±â€¯0.8 per patient) were included. 248 patients (65 ±â€¯11 years, 74% males, 27% diabetics) treated for stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) served as control. 3-years follow-up was available in 386 (90%) patients. Device-oriented composite endpoint and scaffold thrombosis (ScT) rates were similar in the two groups (STEMI: 11.5% vs SCAD: 12.9%, P = 0.84; STEMI: 3.6% vs SCAD: 3.3%, P = 0.90). While early ScT was more frequent in SCAD patients, late/very late ScT was a feature of STEMI. While in STEMI patients the incidence of ScT was higher in vessels with RVD > 3.5 mm, a RVD < 2.5 mm was a predictor of events in stable patients. Similarly, BRS undersizing predicted events in STEMI patients, while oversizing was a predictor in stable ones. Finally, the incidence of ScT was reduced in both STEMI and stable patients (from 6.3% to 0% and from 5.80% to 0.9%) when an optimized implantation technique was used. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of events for three years follow-up was similar in STEMI and SCAD patients, although different timing and features underlie ScT in the two groups.


Assuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis/efeitos adversos , Materiais Biocompatíveis/efeitos adversos , Falha de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Alicerces Teciduais/efeitos adversos , Implantes Absorvíveis/tendências , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Falha de Prótese/tendências , Sistema de Registros , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA