End-tidal CO2 analysis in sleep apnea syndrome. Conditions for use.

The diagnosis of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) requires expensive and complex instrumentation. The purpose of the present study was to determine the value of end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) in screening for sleep apneas. Thirty-nine patients referred to our sleep laboratory because of suspected SAS and ten normal subjects were studied. The EtCO2 was measured using an infrared spectrometer (POET) designed for simultaneous measurement of CO2 and pulse oximetry. In 29 subjects, expired gas was sampled with a nasobuccal mask (Respiron) with lateral orifices. In the other 20 subjects, sampling was done with nasobuccal prongs (Criticare) comprising a four-channel plastic tube to the mouth and the nostrils. Data from an 8-h night were transferred the following day to a microcomputer (Apple Macintosh) for processing. Apnea was defined as an absence of detection of CO2 for more than 10 s. Conventional polysomnography was performed (Respisomnographe). The number of apneas in 8 h and the apnea index (number of apneas in 1 h) were calculated after visual analysis on the screen of the polysomnograph and also with EtCO2 analysis. For recordings made with a nasobuccal mask, the regression curve between the apnea indices computed with EtCO2 and polysomnography was an order 2 polynomial curve (r = 0.76; p < 0.001), with an inflection point at 39 apneas per hour. For recordings with nasobuccal prongs, the correlation was very significant (r = 0.95; p < 0.0001), and the regression curve was linear. The EtCO2 with nasobuccal prongs appears to be a simple and reliable method for screening for SAS.

Is systematic preoperative screening for muscle relaxant and latex allergy advisable?

We investigated a female population prior to general anaesthesia, using skin prick tests with latex and muscle relaxants to appraise the validity and feasibility of a systematic preoperative screening for these substances. Anaesthetists performed skin tests, and positive and doubtful tests were checked in our allergy department. Of 114 patients, 42 had uninterpretable tests because of dermographism (28 patients) or suppression of skin reactivity (14 patients). Among the other 72, nine had a positive or doubtful test to latex, and seven a positive or doubtful test to one or more muscle relaxants. After checking, only four sensitizations to latex and one to muscle relaxant were confirmed. In conclusion, a systematic screening for latex and muscle relaxant allergy is not advisable. In contrast, screening for latex allergy in selected high-risk groups (spina bifida, health-care workers) is necessary.

Latex allergy: allergen identification in Hevea braziliensis fractions by immunoblotting.

BACKGROUND: Latex is the cause of several clinical symptoms of allergy, but the identification of allergens is not completely known. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this report was to study the immunoreactivity of purified stable latex fractions from Hevea braziliensis. METHODS: We purified the cytoplasm of Hevea braziliensis and obtained three fractions: latex particles (LP), lutoids (L) and cytosolic serum (CS). Using Western blot, specific IgE directed to latex allergens was found in 80 patients with latex allergy. RESULTS: Five major groups of allergens migrating as 14, 25, 29, 37-45 and 50 kDa were recognized. They were unequally distributed with the latex fractions: 37-45 kDa proteins were essentially recognized in CS and LP, whereas 14 and 29 kDa proteins were mainly labelled in the L fraction. As a control, aqueous glove extracts exhibited a more restricted pattern of reactivity, because only 14 and 29 kDa proteins were recognized by patient sera. The pattern of reactivity was not correlated specifically with IgE levels, but sera from patients suffering from spina bifida reacted specifically with the minor protein of 25 kDa located in LP. CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that latex allergic patients recognize several allergens which are differently distributed in subcellular fractions extracted from H. braziliensis and aqueous GE. The L fraction and GE were enriched in low molecular weight proteins and apparently contained the same allergens.

Prevalence of latex sensitization in subjects attending health screening: implications for a perioperative screening.

BACKGROUND: Because latex is a common allergen, the rate of latex sensitization may be high in the general population. A major issue would then be to determine whether a systematic preoperative screening in the general population should be recommended. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of latex sensitization in a sample of the general population and to assess the role of possible risk factors. METHODS: The subjects were 258 people, aged from 20 to 40 yr, visiting a health care centre for a check-up. The protocol included: a questionnaire (occupation, symptoms of atopy, use of latex goods and possible reactions, history of previous surgery), a skin-prick test, and a CAP RAST to latex. Atopy was evaluated by a skin-prick test to common allergens and a Phadiatop test. RESULTS: Some 6.6% of the study group had either a positive skin test or a positive RAST to latex. These subjects had a four-fold higher prevalence of symptoms when wearing gloves. The rate of latex sensitization was higher by fivefold in subjects with a history of reactions to latex goods and by fourfold in atopic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Because the rate of latex sensitization is much higher than the anticipated rate of perioperative reactions due to latex allergy, a systematic preoperative screening for latex allergy should not be recommended for adults.

Association between latex sensitization and repeated latex exposure in children.

BACKGROUND: Children with spina bifida are at greater risk for latex and ethylene oxide sensitization. The authors' aim in this study was to evaluate the role of previous surgical procedures in the development of sensitization to latex and ethylene oxide. METHODS: The authors investigated 80 children 1-16 yr old, separated into 3 groups. Two groups had a history of 3 or more general anesthetics: 29 children had spina bifida (spina bifida group) and 31 had undergone multiple surgeries for another disease (multiple surgeries group). A control group of 20 children had undergone less than 1 anesthetic. Clinical manifestations with latex, perioperative anaphylactic reactions, and number of previous anesthetics were recorded. Skin prick tests with a commercial extract of latex, four common inhalant allergens, and radioallergosorbent test to latex and ethylene oxide were performed. RESULTS: The three groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, and atopic status. Mean number of anesthetics was comparable in the spina bifida and the multiple surgeries group. Latex sensitization was common in the spina bifida group (59%) and in the multiple surgeries group (55%) but not in the control group (0%, P < 0.05). Ethylene oxide sensitization was significantly more frequent in the spina bifida group than in the multiple surgeries group (44% vs. 19%; P = 0.052) and strongly associated with latex sensitization. Mean number of previous anesthetics was greater in children sensitized to latex (8.4 vs. 3.9; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that it is the number of surgical procedures rather than spina bifida per se that is related to sensitization to latex.