Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 197, 2023 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37430232

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vertebroplasty is the main minimally invasive operation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF), which has the advantages of rapid pain relief and shorter recovery time. However, new adjacent vertebral compression fracture (AVCF) occurs frequently after vertebroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors of AVCF and establish a clinical prediction model. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients who underwent vertebroplasty in our hospital from June 2018 to December 2019. The patients were divided into a non-refracture group (289 cases) and a refracture group (43 cases) according to the occurrence of AVCF. The independent predictive factors for postoperative new AVCF were determined by univariate analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression, and multivariable logistic regression analysis. A nomogram clinical prediction model was established based on relevant risk factors, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the prediction effect and clinical value of the model. After internal validation, patients who underwent vertebroplasty in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020, including a non-refracture group (156 cases) and a refracture group (21 cases), were included as the validation cohort to evaluate the prediction model again. RESULTS: Three independent risk factors of low bone mass density (BMD), leakage of bone cement and "O" shaped distribution of bone cement were screened out by LASSO regression and logistic regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model in the training cohort and the validation cohort was 0.848 (95%CI: 0.786-0.909) and 0.867 (95%CI: 0.796-0.939), respectively, showing good predictive ability. The calibration curves showed the correlation between prediction and actual status. The DCA showed that the prediction model was clinically useful within the whole threshold range. CONCLUSION: Low BMD, leakage of bone cement and "O" shaped distribution of bone cement are independent risk factors for AVCF after vertebroplasty. The nomogram prediction model has good predictive ability and clinical benefit.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Humanos , Cimentos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Fraturas por Compressão/etiologia , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Modelos Estatísticos , Nomogramas , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversos
2.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 14(4): 2591-4, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23725180

RESUMO

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel liposome (Lipusu®) with paclitaxel in combination with tegafur and oxaliplatin in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy were retrospectively collected, and divided into two groups. Patients in group A received paclitaxel liposomes at a dose of 135 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle, and patients in group B were given paclitaxel at the same dose with the same timing. All patients received tegafur at a dose of 500 mg mg/m2 on days 1-5, and oxaliplatin at a dose of 80-100 mg/m2 on day 1 for 2 cycles (each cycle was 21 d in total). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients could be evaluated for efficacy. The overall response rate was 47% in group A (14/30), and 46% in group B (13/28). Disease control rate was 73% in group A (22/30), and 71% in group B (20/28) (P>0.05). No significant differences were detected in hematologic and neurologic toxicities between the two groups (P>0.05). However, nausea, vomiting and hypersensitive reactions were significantly lower in group A than in group B (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel liposomes are as effective as paclitaxel when combined with tegafur and oxaliplation in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer, but adverse reactions with paclitaxel liposomes are less common.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Lipossomos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Tegafur/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA