Low-dose sirolimus-eluting hydroxyapatite coating on stents does not increase platelet activation and adhesion ex vivo.

We previously found paclitaxel-eluting polymer-coated stents causing more human platelet-monocyte complex formation than bare metal stents in vitro. Presently, we examined patterns of platelet activation and adhesion after exposure to 6 nanofilm HAp-coated (HAp-nano) stents, 6 HAp-microporous-coated (HAp-micro) stents, 5 HAp sirolimus-eluting microporous-coated (HAp-SES) stents and 5 cobalt-chromium stents (BMS) deployed in an in vitro flow system. Blood obtained from healthy volunteers was circulated and sampled at 0, 10, 30 and 60 min. By flow cytometry, there were no significant differences in P-Selectin expression between the 4 stent types (HAp-nano = 32.5%; HAp-micro = 42.5%, HAp-SES = 10.23%, BMS = 7% change from baseline at 60 min, p = NS); PAC-1 antibody binding (HAp-nano = 11.8%; HAp-micro = 2.9%, HAp-SES = 18%, BMS = 6.4% change from baseline at 60 min, p = NS) or PMC formation (HAp-nano = 21.6%; HAp-micro = 4%, HAp-SES = 6.6%, BMS = 17.4% change from baseline at 60 min, p = NS). The 4 stent types did not differ in the average number of platelet clusters >10 µm in diameter by SEM (HAp-nano = 2.39 ± 5.75; HAp-micro = 2.26 ± 3.43; HAp-SES = 1.93 ± 3.24; BMS = 1.94 ± 2.41, p = NS). The majority of the struts in each stent group were only mildly covered by platelets, (HAp-nano = 80%, HAp-micro = 61%, HAp-SES = 78% and BMS = 52.1%, p = NS). The HAp-microporous-coated stents (ECD) attracted slightly more proteinaceous material than bare metal stents (HAp-micro = 35% struts with complete protein coverage, P < 0.0001 vs. other 3 stent types). In conclusion, biomimetic stent coating with nanofilm or microporous hydroxyapatite, even when eluting low-dose sirolimus, does not increase the platelet activation in circulating human blood, or platelet adhesion to stent surface when compared to bare metal stents in vitro.

In vivo plaque characterization using intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology in a porcine model of complex coronary lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of detection of different tissue types of intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology (IVUS-VH) in a porcine model of complex coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary lesions were induced by injecting liposomes containing human oxidized low-density lipoprotein into the adventitia of the arteries. IVUS-VH imaging was performed in vivo at 8.2+/-1.6 weeks after injection. A total of 60 vascular lesions were analyzed and compared with their correspondent IVUS-VH images. Correlation analysis was performed using linear regression models. Compared with histology, IVUS-VH correctly identified the presence of fibrous, fibro-fatty, and necrotic tissue in 58.33%, 38.33%, and 38.33% of lesions, respectively. The sensitivity of IVUS-VH for the detection of fibrous, fibro-fatty, and necrotic core tissue was 76.1%, 46%, and 41.1% respectively. A linear regression analysis performed for each individual plaque component did not show strong correlation that would allow significant prediction of individual values. CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model of complex coronary lesions, IVUS-VH was not accurate in detecting the relative amount of specific plaque components within each individual corresponding histological specimen.

Outcomes with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: the TAXUS-IV trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of polymer-regulated site-specific delivery of paclitaxel in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing stent implantation. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes is associated with high rates of restenosis and repeat revascularization due to excessive neointimal proliferation, a process that may be blunted with the site-specific delivery of paclitaxel. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 patients were prospectively randomized to the slow rate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent or the bare-metal EXPRESS stent (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts). Medically treated diabetes was present in 318 patients (24%), 105 of whom required insulin. RESULTS: Among patients with diabetes, the TAXUS stent, compared to the bare-metal stent, reduced the rate of 9-month binary angiographic restenosis by 81% (6.4% vs. 34.5%, p < 0.0001), and reduced the 12-month rates of target lesion revascularization by 65% (7.4% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.0008), target vessel revascularization by 53% (11.3% vs. 24%, p < 0.004), and composite major adverse cardiac events by 44% (15.6% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.01). The one-year rates of cardiac death (1.9% vs. 2.5%), myocardial infarction (3.2% vs. 6.4%), and subacute thrombosis (0.6% vs. 1.2%) were comparable between the paclitaxel-eluting and control stents, respectively. In the insulin-requiring subgroup, the TAXUS stent reduced angiographic restenosis by 82% (7.7% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.0065), and reduced the one-year rate of target lesion revascularization by 68% (6.2% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.07), a relative reduction similar to patients without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The site-specific delivery of paclitaxel after coronary stent implantation is highly effective in reducing clinical and angiographic restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Comparison of neointimal formation in polymer-free paclitaxel stents versus stainless stents (from the ASPECT and ELUTES randomized clinical trials).

The investigators examined 326 pairs of angiograms from 2 randomized dose-finding (0.2 to 3.1 microg paclitaxel/mm(2) of stent surface area) clinical trials of polymer-free paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo lesions (the ASian Paclitaxel-Eluting stent Clinical Trial [ASPECT] and the European evaLUation of Taxol Eluting Stent [ELUTES]). A dose-dependent effect was observed: the largest dose of paclitaxel in the 2 trials resulted in a significantly larger proportion of lesions at follow-up with <10% diameter stenosis (54% vs 16%, p = 0.00012 in ASPECT; 53% vs 21%, p = 0.013 in ELUTES) and with minimal luminal diameter located outside the stent compared with control stents (62% vs 20% in ASPECT, 48% vs 18% in ELUTES; p <0.05). Also, significantly shorter lesion lengths at 6-month follow-up were observed for the doses of 0.7 to 3.1 microg/mm(2) (p <0.03) relative to their respective lengths before the procedure compared with control stents.

Drug-eluting stents for cardiovascular disorders.

Drug-eluting stents have emerged in recent years as a very promising therapy for prevention of restenosis after coronary implantation. Early randomized, clinical trials have suggested that stents eluting drugs, such as paclitaxel or sirolimus, released from polymeric and nonpolymeric coatings, are able to reduce restenosis in simple de novo lesions by more than 80% in comparison with bare metal stents. If restenosis can be indeed minimized globally by drug-eluting stents, coronary revascularization may expand to patients and lesions currently not considered for percutaneous intervention because of excessive recurrence, and may open possibilities for other stent-based endovascular treatments of atherosclerosis.