Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 12(9): e0185116, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28934281

RESUMO

In numerous studies, liposomes have been used to deliver anticancer drugs such as doxorubicin to local heat-triggered tumor. Here, we investigate: (i) the ability of thermosensitive liposomal nanoparticle (TSLnp) as a delivery system to deliver poorly membrane-permeable anticancer drug, gemcitabine (Gem) to solid pancreatic tumor with the aid of local mild hyperthermia and, (ii) the possibility of using gadolinium (Magnevist®) loaded-TSLnps (Gd-TSLnps) to increase magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast in solid tumor. In this study, we developed and tested gemcitabine-loaded thermosensitive liposomal nanoparticles (Gem-TSLnps) and gadolinium-loaded thermosensitive liposomal nanoparticles (Gd-TSLnps) both in in-vitro and in-vivo. The TSLnps exhibited temperature-dependent release of Gem, at 40-42°C, 65% of Gem was released within 10 min, whereas < 23% Gem leakage occurred at 37°C after a period of 2 h. The pharmacokinetic parameters and tissue distribution of both Gem-TSLnps and Gd-TSLnps were significantly greater compared with free Gem and Gd, while Gem-TSLnps plasma clearance was reduced by 17-fold and that of Gd-TSLpns was decreased by 2-fold. Area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) of Gem-TSLnps (35.17± 0.04 µghr/mL) was significantly higher than that of free Gem (2.09 ± 0.01 µghr/mL) whereas, AUC of Gd-TSLnps was higher than free Gd by 3.9 fold high. TSLnps showed significant Gem accumulation in heated tumor relative to free Gem. Similar trend of increased Gd-TSLnps accumulation was observed in non-heated tumor compared to that of free Gd; however, no significant difference in MRI contrast enhancement between free Gd and Gd-TSLnps ex-vivo tumor images was observed. Despite Gem-TSLnps dose being half of free Gem dose, antitumor efficacy of Gem-TSLnps was comparable to that of free Gem(Gem-TSLnps 10 mg Gem/kg compared with free Gem 20 mg/kg). Overall, the findings suggest that TSLnps may be used to improve Gem delivery and enhance its antitumor activity. However, the formulation of Gd-TSLnp needs to be fully optimized to significantly enhance MRI contrast in tumor.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Meios de Contraste , Lipossomos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Área Sob a Curva , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Meios de Contraste/farmacocinética , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/farmacocinética , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Liberação Controlada de Fármacos , Feminino , Gadolínio/administração & dosagem , Gadolínio/farmacocinética , Temperatura Alta , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/instrumentação , Camundongos Nus , Modelos Biológicos , Nanopartículas , Transplante de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tamanho da Partícula , Imagens de Fantasmas , Viscosidade , Gencitabina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA