German Center Subanalysis of the LEVANT 2 Global Randomized Study of the Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.

PURPOSE: To report a subanalysis of the German centers enrolling patients in the prospective, global, multicenter, randomized LEVANT 2 pivotal trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01412541) of the Lutonix drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. METHODS: Among the 476 patients in LEVANT 2, 126 patients (mean age 67.1±9.6 years; 79 men) were enrolled at the 8 participating German sites between August 2011 and July 2012 and were randomized 2:1 to treatment with the Lutonix DCB (n=83) vs an uncoated balloon during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA, n=43). All patients had intermittent claudication or rest pain (Rutherford categories 2-4). Average lesion length was 58 mm and average treated length was 100 mm. Severe calcification was present in 11% of lesions, and 23% were total occlusions. The efficacy outcome was primary patency at 12 months, and the safety outcome was 12-month freedom from a composite of perioperative death, index limb-related death, amputation (below or above the ankle), and index limb revascularization. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse events, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and lesion characteristics were matched between Lutonix DCB and PTA groups, as were the final percent diameter stenosis (19%) and procedure success (91%). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 12-month primary patency rate was 80% vs 58% (p=0.015) and the composite safety endpoint rate was 94% vs 72% (p=0.001), respectively. Freedom from TLR was higher for DCBs (96%) vs PTA (82%, p=0.012). Major adverse events were similar for both groups. The benefit favoring DCB over PTA was observed in German men and women. Compared to the non-German LEVANT 2 cohort, there was a shorter time between insertion and inflation of treatment balloons (21.8 vs 39.5 seconds, p<0.001) in the German cohort. Balloons were inflated to higher pressures (9.0 vs 7.7 atm, p<0.001) but for a shorter period of time (130 vs 167 seconds, p<0.001), and although treated lesions in the German cohort had a higher baseline stenosis, final postprocedure diameter stenosis was lower (19% vs 22%, p=0.04) than in the non-German patients. CONCLUSION: Superiority of DCB over PTA in the German cohort of LEVANT 2 was demonstrated for primary patency, composite safety, and freedom from TLR. The benefit of DCB was also consistent for both genders. Geographic or regional differences in procedural variables may account for the different outcomes between the German and non-German cohorts.

Intrahepatic Activity Distribution in Radioembolization with Yttrium-90-Labeled Resin Microspheres Using the Body Surface Area Method--A Less than Perfect Model.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the influence of the parameters of the body surface area (BSA) method in hepatic radioembolization using yttrium-90-labeled microspheres on the determination of the prescribed activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 283 consecutive patients treated with radioembolization (BSA method) were included. For interindividual comparisons, activity concentrations (ACs; MBq/mL) were calculated for each liver. The impact of the BSA method parameters was assessed by analysis of variance and pairwise t test with Bonferroni-Holm correction. RESULTS: Prescribed activity was 1.01-2.71 GBq, with BSA, liver volume (LV), tumor burden, and the liver-lung shunt reduction factor (LLS RF) being significant contributing factors to the AC (all P < .0001, analysis of variance). BSA and LV correlated only moderately (ρ = 0.46, P < .0001). Compared with base activity defined by the BSA (median = 1.67 GBq; range, 1.20-2.32 GBq), the activity contribution of tumor burden was small (median = 150 MBq; range, 3-800 MBq). Resulting activities were reduced according to LLS RF by 20% in 12.4% and by 40% in 3.5% of patients. AC was significantly (up to 56%) lower in association with larger LV than in small LV (LV < 1,500 mL vs ≥ 2,500 mL, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the BSA model, BSA and LV showed only a moderate correlation, resulting in a significantly lower AC in patients with larger livers. Tumor burden percentage contributed little to the prescribed activity because the BSA model did not account for actual LVs and tumor volumes. These inaccuracies may potentially result in underdosage in patients with larger livers, especially if further LLS RF needs to be applied.

A direct comparison of multi-energy x-ray and proton CT for imaging and relative stopping power estimation of plastic andex-vivophantoms.

Objective.Proton therapy administers a highly conformal dose to the tumour region, necessitating accurate prediction of the patient's 3D map of proton relative stopping power (RSP) compared to water. This remains challenging due to inaccuracies inherent in single-energy computed tomography (SECT) calibration. Recent advancements in spectral x-ray CT (xCT) and proton CT (pCT) have shown improved RSP estimation compared to traditional SECT methods. This study aims to provide the first comparison of the imaging and RSP estimation performance among dual-energy CT (DECT) and photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanners, and a pCT system prototype.Approach.Two phantoms were scanned with the three systems for their performance characterisation: a plastic phantom, filled with water and containing four plastic inserts and a wood insert, and a heterogeneous biological phantom, containing a formalin-stabilised bovine specimen. RSP maps were generated by converting CT numbers to RSP using a calibration based on low- and high-energy xCT images, while pCT utilised a distance-driven filtered back projection algorithm for RSP reconstruction. Spatial resolution, noise, and RSP accuracy were compared across the resulting images.Main results.All three systems exhibited similar spatial resolution of around 0.54 lp/mm for the plastic phantom. The PCCT images were less noisy than the DECT images at the same dose level. The lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of RSP,(0.28±0.07)%, was obtained with the pCT system, compared to MAPE values of(0.51±0.08)%and(0.80±0.08)%for the DECT- and PCCT-based methods, respectively. For the biological phantom, the xCT-based methods resulted in higher RSP values in most of the voxels compared to pCT.Significance.The pCT system yielded the most accurate estimation of RSP values for the plastic materials, and was thus used to benchmark the xCT calibration performance on the biological phantom. This study underlined the potential benefits and constraints of utilising such a novelex-vivophantom for inter-centre surveys in future.

Image-guided embolization of arteriovenous malformations of the hand using Ethylene-vinyl Alcohol Copolymer.

PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the safety and outcome of image-guided embolization for treating arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the hand using ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH). METHODS A retrospective, multicenter cohort of 15 patients with AVMs of the hand treated with 35 imageguided embolotherapies using EVOH was investigated. Clinical history, symptomatology, and imaging findings were assessed to evaluate clinical outcome (symptom-free, partial relief of pain, no improvement of pain, and clinical progression despite embolization), lesion devascularization (total, 100%; near-total, 90%-99%; substantial, 70%-90%; partial, 30%-70%; and failure, 0%-30%), and peri- and postprocedural complication rates (major complications classified according to CIRSE guidelines). Substratification analysis was performed with respect to the involvement of different anatomical compartments and the injected volume of the embolic agent. RESULTS Patients were treated for pain (93.3%), skin ulceration (46.7%), and local bleeding (33.3%). The mean number of embolotherapies was 2.3 (±1.1) in 3 patients, a planned surgical resection was conducted after embolization. Clinical outcome after a median follow-up of 18 months revealed an overall response of 11/15 patients (73.3%). Imaging at last follow-up revealed 70%- 99% reduced vascularization in 12/15 patients (80%) including 2 patients (13.3%) with a neartotal devascularization of 90%-99%. Peri- and postprocedural complications occurred in 8.5% and 31.5%, respectively, including 17.1% major complications, in 1 case requiring a previously unplanned resection. Involvement of the finger was associated with increased rates of persistent symptoms compared to the other groups (P=.049). No significant difference between the embolic agent volume injected and complication rates was found (P=.372). CONCLUSION Image-guided embolization using EVOH-based liquid embolic agents is effective for treating AVMs of the hand in the mid-term.

Percutaneous Sclerotherapy of Venous Malformations of the Hand: A Multicenter Analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and outcome of percutaneous sclerotherapy for treating venous malformations (VMs) of the hand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter trial of 29 patients with VMs primarily affecting the hand, including wrist, carpus, and/or fingers, treated by 81 percutaneous image-guided sclerotherapies using ethanol gel and/or polidocanol was performed. Clinical and imaging findings were assessed to evaluate clinical response, lesion size reduction, and complication rates. Substratification analysis was performed with respect to the Puig's classification, the sclerosing agent, the injected volume of the sclerosant, and to previously performed treatments. RESULTS: The mean number of procedures per patient was 2.8 (± 2.2). Last follow-up (mean = 9.2 months) revealed a partial relief of symptoms in 78.9% (15/19), while three patients (15.8%) presented symptom-free and one patient (5.3%) with no improvement. Post-treatment imaging revealed an overall objective response rate of 88.9%. Early post-procedural complications occurred after 5/81 sclerotherapies (6.2%) and were entirely resolved by conservative means. Type of VM (Puig's classification) as well as sclerosing agent had no impact on clinical response (p = 0.85, p = 0.11) or complication rates (p = 0.66, p = 0.69). The complication rates were not associated with the sclerosant volume injected (p = 0.76). In addition, no significant differences in clinical success (p = 0.11) or complication rates (p = 0.89) were detected when comparing patients with history of previous treatments compared to therapy-naive patients. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous sclerotherapy is both safe and effective for treating VMs of the hand. Even patients with history of previous treatments benefit from further sclerotherapy showing similar low complication rates to therapy-naive patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Retrospective study.

Inhibition of restenosis in femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: The success of percutaneous intervention in peripheral arterial disease is limited by restenosis. The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate a novel method of local drug delivery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized multicenter study with blinded reading enrolled 87 patients in Rutherford class 1 to 4 with occlusion or hemodynamically relevant stenosis, restenosis, or in-stent restenosis of femoropopliteal arteries. Treatment was performed by either conventional uncoated or paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters. The primary end point was late lumen loss at 6 months. Secondary end points included restenosis rate, ankle brachial index, Rutherford class, target lesion revascularization, and tolerance up to >18 months. Before intervention, there were no significant differences in lesion characteristics such as reference diameter (5.3+/-1.1 versus 5.2+/-1.0 mm), degree of stenosis (84+/-11% versus 84+/-16%), proportion of restenotic lesions (36% versus 33%), and mean lesion length (5.7 cm [0.8 to 22.6 cm] versus 6.1 cm [0.9 to 19.3 cm]) between treatment groups. The 6-month follow-up angiography performed in 31 of 45 and 34 of 42 patients showed less late lumen loss in the coated balloon group (0.5+/-1.1 versus 1.0+/-1.1 mm; P=0.031). The number of target lesion revascularizations was lower in the paclitaxel-coated balloon group than in control subjects (3 of 45 versus 14 of 42 patients; P=0.002). Improvement in Rutherford class was greater in the coated balloon group (P=0.045), whereas the improvement in ankle brachial index was not different. The difference in target lesion revascularizations between treatment groups was maintained up to >18 months. No adverse events were assessed as related to balloon coating. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot trial, paclitaxel balloon coating caused no obvious adverse events and reduced restenosis in patients undergoing angioplasty of femoropopliteal arteries.

The LEVANT I (Lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon for the prevention of femoropopliteal restenosis) trial for femoropopliteal revascularization: first-in-human randomized trial of low-dose drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Lutonix drug-coated balloon (DCB) coated with 2 µg/mm(2)paclitaxel and a polysorbate/sorbitol carrier for treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous treatment of peripheral vascular disease is associated with a high recurrence. Paclitaxel-coated balloons at 3 µg/mm(2) formulated differently have shown promising results with reduced restenosis. Methods Subjects at 9 centers with Rutherford class 2 to 5 femoropopliteal lesions were randomized between June 2009 and December 2009 to treatment with Lutonix DCB (n = 49) versus uncoated balloons (control group [n = 52]), stratified by whether balloon-only treatment (n = 75) or stenting (n = 26) was intended. The primary endpoint was angiographic late lumen loss at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included adjudicated major adverse events (death, amputation, target lesion thrombosis, reintervention), functional outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Demographic, peripheral vascular disease, and lesion characteristics were matched, with mean lesion length of 8.1 3.8 cm and 42% total occlusions. At 6 months, late lumen loss was 58% lower for the Lutonix DCB group (0.46 1.13 mm) than for the control group (1.09 1.07 mm; p = 0.016). Composite 24-month major adverse events were 39% for the DCB group, including 15 target lesion revascularizations, 1 amputation, and 4 deaths versus 46% for uncoated balloon group, with 20 target lesion revascularizations, 1 thrombosis, and 5 deaths. Pharmacokinetics showed biexponential decay with peak concentration (Cmax) of 59 ng/ml and total observed exposure (AUC(all)) of 73 ng h/ml. For successful DCB deployment excluding 8 malfunctions, 6-month late lumen loss was 0.39 mm and the 24-month target lesion revascularization rate was 24%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of femoropopliteal lesions with the low-dose Lutonix DCB reduced late lumen loss with safety comparable to that of control angioplasty. (LEVANT I, The Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Prevention of Femoropopliteal Restenosis; NCT00930813)