RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Finding a protocol that could prevent bone resorption and be implemented in clinical practice would be crucial in providing sufficient bone to replace missing teeth with implants. PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of different centrifugation platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) protocols in new bone formation and bone regenerative markers. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING AND SAMPLE: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at Izmir Katip Çelebi Research Hospital, a population-based facility in Izmir. Study subjects were composed of patients who required extraction of anterior teeth. Exclusion criteria included periodontal disease, resorption of alveolar bone, defects, smoking, alcoholism, and systemic diseases. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The independent variable was the PRF protocol. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and control groups (healing naturally). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome of interest was the percentage of new bone formation, determined by analyzing the staining intensity in histomorphometric assessments of bone samples collected 8 weeks after extraction. The secondary outcomes were regenerative effects measured by the immunohistochemical expression of markers such as osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Potential benefits were evaluated by clinical observations of pain, swelling, membrane visibility and healing. COVARIATES: The covariates were age, sex and health conditions. ANALYSES: Histologic comparative staining intensities and biomarkers expression between groups were evaluated by one way analysis of variance. A difference of P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study included 57 subjects, with a mean age of 45 years (±5.6); 30 were male (53%) and 27 female (47%). The control group had a mean new bone formation of 32.68% (±2.5), the A-PRF group 61.37% (±3.0), and the L-PRF group 70.74% (±3.5) (P < .001). The A-PRF group showed significantly higher osteocalcin expression than the control group (P = .013). Alkaline phosphatase and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression scores for PRF groups were significantly higher than the control group's (P = .001). Both groups demonstrated significantly lower pain scores, reduced gingival swelling, better membrane visibility, and healing compared to the control group. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: PRF enhanced bone formation rates, with L-PRF showing the most significant effect.
RESUMO
This study had two aims. First, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of ACB, PCB, and oral habits among a group of Albanian children with ASD compared with a group of children without ASD. Second, we aimed to identify the associations of ASD with ACB, PCB, and oral habits. The sample inlcuded 125 children with ASD (91 males, 34 females) from 2 special schools for children with disabilities and 2 daily residential centers in Tirana. The control group included 125 children without ASD. The relationships between categorical variables were evaluated via the chi-square test. To identify the potential risk factors for ASD, we performed binary logistic regression. No statistically significant differences were found for CB or oral habits between the primary and adolescent dentition stages. A comparison of children with ASD with CB and oral habits revealed a significant difference in the prevalence of PCB. Binary logistic regression revealed that ACB, PCB and oral habits were not associated with ASD. CB was more prevalent among children with ASD in the primary and mixed dentition stages. Oral habits were more prevalent in the mixed and adolescent dentition stages. However, ASD is not a risk factor for CB or other oral habits.