Condylar Volumetric Asymmetry Predicts Need for Surgical Intervention in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors investigate the associations between the mandibular condyle and facial asymmetry in patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP). METHODS: Condylar volume was calculated by measuring the bony volume of the posterior mandible superior to the sigmoid notch in skeletally mature patients with CLP and controls. Relationships between condylar asymmetry, facial deviation, and malocclusion were compared using t-tests, correlation analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: This study included 118 patients: 60 with CLP preparing for orthognathic surgery, 17 with CLP who did not undergo orthognathic surgery, and 41 controls. Condylar volumes in patients with CLP preparing for orthognathic surgery were more asymmetric than those with CLP not requiring surgery (16.4 ± 17.4% vs 7.1 ± 6.0%, P = 0.03). Patients with CLP who did not undergo orthognathic surgery and controls had similar degrees of condylar asymmetry (7.1 ± 6.0% vs 5.9 ± 3.8%, P = 0.35). Condylar asymmetry correlated with chin deviation (P < 0.01). Patients with CLP and clinically significant chin deviation (>4 mm) had more asymmetric condyles than those without significant chin deviation, and the chin usually deviated toward the smaller condyle (P = 0.03). Condylar asymmetry >11% predicted undergoing orthognathic surgery in CLP with 70% sensitivity and 67% specificity. CONCLUSION: Condylar asymmetry is associated with facial asymmetry in patients with CLP, and the facial midline often deviates towards the smaller condyle. Condylar volumetric asymmetry in patients with CLP may be a predictor for needing orthognathic surgery, useful information for surgeons and families alike.

Radiographic Evidence of Dental Complications Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: Inverted-L versus Oblique Osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with micrognathia undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) for functional and aesthetic improvement are at significant risk for dental complications. This study investigates association of two osteotomy patterns-oblique and inverted-L-with risk to developing dentition. METHODS: Our senior orthodontist performed a retrospective review of dental radiographs of patients undergoing MDO with confirmed oblique or inverted-L osteotomies between 2012 and 2022. Images were assessed for evidence of missing, damaged, or displaced teeth, and proportion of affected hemimandibles by injury type and median number of affected teeth per hemimandible were compared between groups using appropriate statistical methodology. RESULTS: Analysis included 44 patients (23 oblique, 21 inverted-L) and 85 hemimandibles (45 and 40). Mean age at surgery was 3.1±4.6 years, and mean time to imaging was 4.9±4.1 years; there was no difference between groups (p=0.23, p=0.34, respectively). Oblique osteotomy was associated with greater odds of missing teeth (OR 13.3, p<0.001), damaged teeth (OR 3.2, p=0.02), and any dental injury (OR 39.9, p<0.001) compared to inverted-L, as well as greater number of missing teeth (ß=0.6, p<0.01), damaged teeth (ß=0.3, p=0.02), and total number of affected teeth (ß=0.9, p<0.001). There was no difference in incidence (p=0.5) or number (p=0.4) of displaced teeth between groups. CONCLUSION: Inverted-L osteotomies were associated with fewer dental complications as compared to oblique osteotomy at all ages studied. While longer-term follow up and prospective data are needed prior to making definitive recommendations, this data is helpful to surgeons as they plan MDO.