Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem ; 86(10): 1482-1484, 2022 Sep 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881488

RESUMO

The degradation of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) by modified PET depolymerase has recently attracted much attention. We found that mixing a PET depolymerase with non-genetically modified Thermus sp. can enhance its PET-degrading activity by 7.7-fold. This approach is attractive for constructing a sustainable PET recycling system.


Assuntos
Enzimas , Polietilenotereftalatos , Enzimas/metabolismo , Polietilenotereftalatos/metabolismo , Thermus
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(8): 899-906, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25857604

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evidence is lacking on the preventive effect of oral care on healthcare-associated pneumonia in hospitalized patients and nursing home residents who are not mechanically ventilated. The primary aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of oral care on the incidence of pneumonia in nonventilated patients. METHODS: We searched 8 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, ICHUSHI, and CiNii), in addition to trial registries and a manual search. Eligible studies were published and unpublished randomized controlled trials examining the effect of any method of oral care on reported incidence of pneumonia and/or fatal pneumonia. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed for eligible studies. RESULTS: We identified 5 studies consisting of 1,009 subjects that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 2 trials assessed the effect of chlorhexidine in hospitalized patients; 3 studies examined mechanical oral cleaning in nursing home residents. A meta-analysis could only be done on 4 trials; this analysis showed a significant risk reduction in pneumonia through oral care interventions (RRfixed, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.91; P=.02). The effects of mechanical oral care alone were significant when pooled across studies. (RRfixed, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.92; P=.02). Risk reduction for fatal pneumonia from mechanical oral cleaning was also significant (RRfixed, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71; P=.002). Most studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests a preventive effect of oral care on pneumonia in nonventilated individuals. This effect, however, should be interpreted with caution due to risk of bias in the included trials.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Higiene Bucal/métodos , Pneumonia Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Humanos , Incidência , Casas de Saúde , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA