Preoperative evaluation of oral hygiene may predict the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previously, the association between tooth loss and prognosis after esophagectomy was reported; however, the presence of periodontal disease has not been assessed. This study investigated the association between the degree of oral hygiene, as evaluated by tooth loss and periodontal disease, and the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: A total of 163 esophageal cancer patients who underwent surgery with perioperative oral care and examination were enrolled. We assessed the periodontal pocket depth for the presence of periodontal disease and established a periodontal pocket index, defined as the sum of the periodontal pocket depth of the remaining tooth divided by the total count of the remaining teeth. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index < 3.67); Group B (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index ≥ 3.67); and Group C (tooth loss ≥ 13). Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were analyzed, and a multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the 5-year overall survival rates between the groups (A:B:C = 74.8%:62.8%:50.5%; p = 0.0098), but not in the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates (A:B:C = 80.2%:64.2%:62.2%; p = 0.0849). In multivariate analysis, oral hygiene (tooth loss < 13 and periodontal pocket index ≥ 3.67 + tooth loss ≥ 13; p = 0.041) was a significant independent poor prognostic factor for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Oral evaluation, focusing on tooth loss and periodontal disease, is meaningful in predicting the long-term prognosis of postoperative esophageal cancer patients.

Visualizing Bioabsorbable Spacer Effectiveness by Confirming the Distal-Tail of Carbon-Ion Beams: First-In-Human Report.

In particle therapy, bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) spacer was developed to reduce the healthy organ irradiation dose, especially in the gastrointestinal tract. The PGA spacer is safe and effective; however, there are no reports that have confirmed whether the PGA spacer which inserted in the body actually stops the carbon-ion (C-ion) beams. Here, we visualized and confirmed that the PGA spacer stops the C-ion beams in the body based on the dose distribution using auto-activation positron emission tomography (AAPET). A 59-year-old dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma patient underwent C-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) on referral. A month before C-ion RT initiation, the patient underwent PGA spacer placement. Postoperatively, the patient received 4.4 Gy (RBE) per fraction of C-ion RT, followed by AAPET. AAPET revealed lower positron emitter concentrations at the distal tissue ventral to the PGA spacer than in the planning target volume. In observing the efficacy of the PGA spacer, the AAPET images and the average count per second of the positron emitter suggested that the PGA spacer stopped the C-ion beams in the body in accordance with the dose distribution. Therefore, AAPET was useful in confirming the PGA spacer's effectiveness in this study, and the PGA spacer stopped the C-ion beams.

Resistance to Preoperative Oral Care Is Associated With Postoperative Pneumonia After Oesophageal Cancer Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Postoperative pneumonia is a serious complication of major oesophageal surgery. We aimed to clarify the association between the degree of improvement in oral hygiene by perioperative oral care and postoperative pneumonia in oesophageal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oesophageal cancer patients (n=129) who underwent esophagectomy received perioperative oral care. Their oral hygiene was evaluated using the Oral Assessment Guide (OAG). The relationship between perioperative OAG scores and postoperative complications was analysed. RESULTS: The average OAG scores before starting oral care, pre-operation, and post-operation were 11.0±1.7, 9.1±1.5, and 11.2±3.0, respectively (p<0.001). An increase in preoperative OAG scores was independently associated with postoperative pneumonia on multivariate analysis (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: Preoperative oral care improves oral hygiene in patients undergoing oesophageal cancer surgery. No improvement in oral hygiene despite preoperative oral care was an independent predictor of postoperative pneumonia.

Twice-monthly administration of a lower dose of epoetin beta pegol can maintain adequate hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients.

Epoetin beta pegol is a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) with a long half-life. Although CERA has been shown to maintain adequate hemoglobin (Hb) levels at prolonged dosing intervals, the optimal dosing schedule remains unclear. We therefore compared the efficacy of maintaining hemoglobin levels with administration of twice-monthly CERA (TWICE) versus once-monthly CERA (ONCE). Twenty hemodialysis patients receiving epoetin beta (EPO) were enrolled in this crossover study. Patients were assigned to either the TWICE or the ONCE group based on matching Hb levels and EPO doses. After 6 months of treatment, the CERA dosage was interchanged between the groups and the study was continued for an additional 6 months. The effect of the different regimens on iron metabolism was also assessed during the first 6 months of the study. Hb levels significantly increased in the TWICE group, allowing for a reduction in CERA dosage, while the dose of CERA required to maintain Hb levels in the ONCE group remained unchanged. After the interchange, a decrease in Hb levels with incremental increase in CERA dosage was observed in the TWICE→ONCE group, with the opposite effect observed in the ONCE→TWICE group. Although increases in ferritin and hepcidin-25 levels in the ONCE group were noted at one month, they disappeared at 6 months. Although Hb levels were maintained in both the ONCE and TWICE groups, a twice-monthly administration was advantageous, as it required a lower dose of CERA.

Comparison of 2-week versus 4-week dosing intervals of epoetin beta pegol on erythropoiesis and iron metabolism in hemodialysis patients.

Epoetin beta pegol (a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator; CERA) is usually administered once in 4 weeks or once monthly. However, the optimal dosing interval remains unknown. We, therefore, compared the effect of CERA administration between dosing intervals of 2 weeks (TWICE group) and 4 weeks (ONCE group) on erythropoiesis and iron metabolism in 20 hemodialysis patients. CERA was administered intravenously at weeks 0 and 2 for the TWICE group, and at week 0 for the ONCE group. Levels of hemoglobin (Hb), reticulocyte count, ferritin, transferrin saturation, content of Hb in reticulocytes and hepcidin-25 were monitored weekly for 4 weeks. Hemoglobin levels were significantly increased at weeks 3 and 4 in the TWICE group, while a gradual decrease after a significant increase at week 1 was observed in the ONCE group. Ferritin levels remained significantly low from week 1 to week 4 in the TWICE group. On the other hand, ferritin levels increased beyond baseline levels at week 4 in the ONCE group. Although hepcidin-25 did not significantly increase in the TWICE group, significant increases beyond baseline levels at weeks 3 and 4 were found in the ONCE group. These results indicate that continuous erythropoiesis was achieved with biweekly administration of CERA. Moreover, CERA at a 2-week interval led to a sustained suppression of ferritin and hepcidin-25 levels, suggesting a favorable influence on iron metabolism.