Effect of an educational intervention among Lebanese dentists on antibiotic prescribing: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether an educational intervention could improve antibiotic prescribing among Lebanese dentists and assess antibiotic prescribing patterns regarding international guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An interventional randomized controlled trial was conducted from the first of April to the end of August 2017. This was an oral presentation of about 20 min based on a review of the literature and the international guidelines. Sixty dentists specializing in oral dental surgery or general practitioners participated in this study. All the patients who took a consultation over 2 months were involved. RESULTS: In this study, 950 antibiotic prescriptions were analyzed. A change was found only in antibiotics prescribed for tooth extraction and tooth extraction (impacted tooth). The intervention was impactful in raising the mean percentage of prescriptions compliant with indication and with the choice regarding antibiotics prescribed for prophylactic reasons. A dentist in the intervention group would have after the intervention period a mean percentage of prescriptions compliant with indication and with choice of 31.7% and 20.7%, respectively, above one in the control group. Despite the decrease in the overall number of antibiotics prescribed by dentists in the intervention group over time, this does not suggest that this was solely due to the effect of the intervention. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of continuing medical education to optimize antibiotic use in dentistry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study can serve as the basis for a future audit, training, and feedback intervention to increase dentists' awareness of recommended guidelines and optimal antibiotic use.

Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination and its determinants among Lebanese dentists: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Dentists are at high risk of exposure to occupational Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since vaccination is crucial to control COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to assess COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and its determinants among Lebanese practicing dentists. METHODS: A cross-sectional online study was conducted between February 15 and 22, 2021, among dentists practicing in Lebanon. Prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was estimated. A multivariable modified Poisson regression model was used to explore determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. RESULTS: In total, 86% of participants were willing to receive or have already received a COVID-19 vaccine. Having received the influenza vaccine during the COVID-19 pandemic was linked to a 12% increase in the COVID-19 vaccination acceptance rate. In addition, participants having moderate and high COVID-19 vaccination knowledge levels were more likely to accept receiving the vaccine, and participants whose fear of COVID-19 level was high were more likely to accept receiving the vaccine compared to those having a low fear level. Contrarily, those who visit the medical doctor only when needed and once a year were less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccine compared to participants who routinely visit the medical doctor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a high level of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination among Lebanese practicing dentists. And since knowledge about COVID-19 vaccination was associated with the vaccine acceptance, it should be improved and updated to further increase the acceptance rate. High acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination among dentists is expected to have a positive impact among the population in terms of increasing awareness and vaccine uptake.

Determinants of knowledge and prevention measures towards COVID-19 pandemic among Lebanese dentists: a cross sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major global threat. Healthcare professionals including dentists are facing real challenges during this pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and prevention measures of Lebanese dentists towards COVID-19 and determinants of high level of knowledge and prevention practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and August 2020 in Lebanon on a random sample of 323 Lebanese dentists. Data were collected through an online survey questionnaire. A multivariate linear regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with COVID-19 knowledge. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the factors associated with high level of prevention measures towards COVID-19. RESULTS: The mean COVID-19 knowledge index was 24.5 over 38 with only 15% achieving high knowledge level. The mean prevention measures index was 11.4 over 16 with only 35% achieving high prevention level. Higher knowledge index was associated with younger age, being employed, and considering dentist's role significant in teaching others about COVID-19. General dental practitioners, dentists living with family members and concerned about their family members to get infected because of their occupational exposure were more likely to report higher level of adopted prevention measures. Higher knowledge was associated with high level of prevention measures. CONCLUSIONS: Given the rapid evolution of information related to COVID-19 pandemic, dentists should be regularly educated through trainings, workshops, and updates of national guidelines for dental healthcare.

SOPROLIFE system: an accurate diagnostic enhancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate a light-emitting diode fluorescence tool, the SOPROLIFE light-induced fluorescence evaluator, and compare it to the international caries detection and assessment system-II (ICDAS-II) in the detection of occlusal caries. METHODS: A total of 219 permanent posterior teeth in 21 subjects, with age ranging from 15 to 65 years, were examined. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed to assess the reliability between the two diagnostic methods. RESULTS: The results showed a high reliability between the two methods (ICC = 0.92; IC = 0.901-0.940; P < 0.001). The SOPROLIFE blue fluorescence mode had a high sensitivity (87%) and a high specificity (99%) when compared to ICDAS-II. CONCLUSION: Compared to the most used visual method in the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions, the finding from this study suggests that SOPROLIFE can be used as a reproducible and reliable assessment tool. At a cut-off point, categorizing noncarious lesions and visual change in enamel, SOPROLIFE shows a high sensitivity and specificity. We can conclude that financially ICDAS is better than SOPROLIFE. However SOPROLIFE is easier for clinicians since it is a simple evaluation of images. Finally in terms of efficiency SOPROLIFE is not superior to ICDAS but tends to be equivalent with the same advantages.

An evaluation of prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic prescribing in Lebanese dental practice.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate antibiotic prescribing patterns and correlates among Lebanese dentists. METHODS: A descriptive observational study was conducted, from the first of April to the end of May 2017. Dentists who specialized in oral dental surgery or general dental practitioners were eligible to participate in this study. All patients who sought consultation with the selected dentists over a 1 month period were included. KEY FINDINGS: A total of 2323 oral and dental procedures were performed by 60 dentists; 553 antibiotic prescriptions were prescribed, representing 23.8% (52.35% for prophylactic purposes and 47.65% for curative purposes). Prophylactic indications were mainly for implant surgery (36.3%) with only 1% appropriate. Curative use was mainly for periodontal abscesses/abscesses (indeterminate) (22.8%), followed by pulpal diseases and periradicular complications (20.5%); it was appropriate in only 1.7 and 1.9% of cases respectively. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was the antibiotic that was mostly prescribed for both curative and prophylactic uses (57.6 and 55.9%, respectively), followed by amoxicillin for prophylactic purposes and a combination of spiramycin plus metronidazole for curative purposes. Adherence to guidelines was low for both curative and prophylactic purposes (17.4 and 21.8%, respectively), but was better in patients who were younger [adjusted odds ratio(aOR) = 0.96], male (aOR = 0.40), or had cardiac disease with moderate or high infective endocarditis risk (aOR = 21.72), and when prescribed by oral surgeons (aOR = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed evidence of the overuse of antibiotics among Lebanese dentists. It can serve as a basis for future studies to optimize antibiotic use among dentists in Lebanon.

Knowledge, practice and attitudes regarding antibiotics use among Lebanese dentists.

OBJECTIVES: Explore antibiotic use, assess conformity with evidence-practice guidelines, and describe knowledge and attitudinal factors among Lebanese dentists. METHODS: National cross-sectional telephonic survey, using a standardized questionnaire addressing demographic, educational and professional data, usual antibiotics prophylactic and curative prescription pattern and influential factors, knowledge concerning antibiotics use in selected patient-populations, and attitude regarding antimicrobial resistance. Analyses used descriptive statistics, and bivariate analysis to observe predictors of higher knowledge. RESULTS: the overall response rate for the study was around 21%. 322 dentists participated. On average, 17.51% of consultations resulted in antibiotic use; previous antibiotic experience mostly influenced prescriptions (81.3%). Referral of pregnant and lactating women and cardiac patients, when antibiotics are needed, was high (26.9%, 28.5% and 79.4%, respectively). Macrolides were the dominant first-line antibiotics in penicillin allergy (47.4%). Penicillins were most common for pregnant and lactating women. Penicillins (95.0%), 2g (63.9%), and 1 hour pre-procedure (34%) were the main components of prophylaxis for cardiac patients. Prophylactic and curative use varied widely; few dentists exhibited guideline-conform prescriptions. Mean knowledge scores of prophylaxis for cardiac and non-cardiac patients, and antibiotics' side effects were predominantly poor (46.75±14.82, 39.21±33.09 and 20.27±18.77, respectively over 100). Practicing outside Beirut, undergraduate qualification in Lebanon, and post-graduate qualification predicted higher knowledge. 75.9% acknowledged the contribution of dentistry-based prescribing to antibiotic resistance and 94.7% knew at least one cause of resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists show positive attitude towards antimicrobial resistance. Yet, they lack uniformity in antibiotic stewardship. Poor knowledge and guideline-incongruent prophylactic and therapeutic prescribing are observed. Development of targeted interventions is needed to promote judicious antibiotic use within Lebanese dentistry.