RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rapid detection and identification of viruses are important for early diagnosis and effective surveillance of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). We described a novel assay using multilocus PCR and reverse transcription-PCR coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (RT-PCR/ESI-MS) to simultaneously detect and identify human enterovirus A-D, adenovirus A-F, human herpesvirus 1-8, parvovirus B19 and polyomavirus. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of the RT-PCR/ESI-MS method, to detect and type enterovirus from specimens of clinical diagnosed HFMD patients. STUDY DESIGN: In this study, 152 specimens of clinically diagnosed HFMD patients were studied by the assay using RT-PCR/ESI-MS method. The detection and typing of enterovirus by RT-PCR/ESI-MS were compared with results from reference molecular methods. RESULTS: The assay detected enteroviruses in 97 (63.8%) specimens, resulting in a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI: 91.8-95.7%) and a specificity of 87.5% (95% CI: 84.8-90.2%) compared with a reference clinical diagnostic test. Most enterovirus genotypes (65/84; 77%) determined by the platform were consistent with 5' UTR sequence analysis, and most misidentifications resulted from the virus library, which could be further improved by updating the enterovirus database. In addition to enteroviruses, herpesviruses, polyomaviruses, adenoviruses and human rhinoviruses were detected and identified in 55 (36%) HFMD specimens by RT-PCR/ESI-MS. CONCLUSION: With the capability of high throughput and detection and typing of multiple clinically relevant viruses simultaneously, RT-PCR/ESI-MS can be a rapid and robust laboratory tool for identifying viral pathogens.
Assuntos
Enterovirus/isolamento & purificação , Doença de Mão, Pé e Boca/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização por Electrospray/métodos , Virologia/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Enterovirus/classificação , Enterovirus/genética , Feminino , Doença de Mão, Pé e Boca/virologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a prophylactic regimen of daily topical 0.5% moxifloxacin and 5% povidone-iodine (PI) in patients with Boston type I keratoprosthesis (KPro) and to assess the applicability of a novel molecular diagnostic technique to analyze the ocular surface microbiota in these patients. METHODS: Ten patients had their inferior conjunctival fornix sampled for standard culture methods before the addition of topical 5% PI to the prophylactic regimen and were considered the control group (group 1). The inferior conjunctival fornix and the KPro-donor cornea interface of 10 patients treated with the mentioned prophylactic regimen were sampled and analyzed by standard culture methods and using a polymerase chain reaction/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry assay (group 2). RESULTS: Samples from the inferior conjunctival fornix were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus in 3 patients and for Aerobasidium pullulans in 1 patient in group 1. The inferior conjunctival fornix and the KPro-donor cornea interface scrapings were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus in 2 patients and 1 patient, respectively, in group 2. No bacteria and fungi growth were detected in any patient from group 2 with the molecular diagnostic approach. None of the patients with culture-positive results developed keratitis or endophthalmitis during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Topical 0.5% moxifloxacin associated with topical 5% PI is an effective prophylactic regimen in patients with Boston type I KPro. The molecular diagnostic approach using serial polymerase chain reaction and mass spectrometry was comparable with standard microbiologic techniques as a surveillance tool in these patients.
Assuntos
Compostos Aza/administração & dosagem , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Povidona-Iodo/administração & dosagem , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Doenças da Córnea/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endoftalmite/prevenção & controle , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/etiologia , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/microbiologia , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas , Humanos , Masculino , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Moxifloxacina , Estudos Prospectivos , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
Influenza virus is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, yet little quantitative understanding of transmission is available to guide evidence-based public health practice. Recent studies of influenza non-contact transmission between ferrets and guinea pigs have provided insights into the relative transmission efficiencies of pandemic and seasonal strains, but the infecting dose and subsequent contagion has not been quantified for most strains. In order to measure the aerosol infectious dose for 50% (aID(50)) of seronegative ferrets, seasonal influenza virus was nebulized into an exposure chamber with controlled airflow limiting inhalation to airborne particles less than 5 µm diameter. Airborne virus was collected by liquid impinger and Teflon filters during nebulization of varying doses of aerosolized virus. Since culturable virus was accurately captured on filters only up to 20 minutes, airborne viral RNA collected during 1-hour exposures was quantified by two assays, a high-throughput RT-PCR/mass spectrometry assay detecting 6 genome segments (Ibis T5000™ Biosensor system) and a standard real time RT-qPCR assay. Using the more sensitive T5000 assay, the aID(50) for A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) was approximately 4 infectious virus particles under the exposure conditions used. Although seroconversion and sustained levels of viral RNA in upper airway secretions suggested established mucosal infection, viral cultures were almost always negative. Thus after inhalation, this seasonal H1N1 virus may replicate less efficiently than H3N2 virus after mucosal deposition and exhibit less contagion after aerosol exposure.