Reporting combined outcomes with Trifecta and survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification in 337 patients with prostate cancer treated with image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To report the image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-IGRT) outcome for patients with localised prostate cancer according to the new outcome models Trifecta (cancer control, urinary continence, and sexual potency) and SCP (failure-free survival, continence and potency). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 2006 and January 2011, 337 patients with cT1-T2N0M0 prostate cancer (median age 73 years) were eligible for a prospective longitudinal study on hypo-IGRT (70.2 Gy/26 fractions) in our Department. Patients completed four questionnaires before treatment, and during follow-up: the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer prostate-cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaires (QLQ) QLQ-PR25 and QLQ-C30. Baseline and follow-up patient data were analysed according to the Trifecta and SCP outcome models. Cancer control, continence and potency were defined respectively as no evidence of disease, score 1 or 2 for item 36 of the QLQ-PR25 questionnaire, and total score of >16 on the IIEF-5 questionnaire. Patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) at any time were excluded. RESULTS: Trifecta criteria at baseline were met in 72 patients (42% of all ADT-free patients with completed questionnaires). Both at 12 and 24 months after hypo-IGRT, 57% of the Trifecta patients at baseline were still meeting the Trifecta criteria (both oncological and functional success according to the SCP model). The main reason for failing the Trifecta criteria during follow-up was erectile dysfunction: in 18 patients after 6 months follow-up, in 12 patients after 12 months follow-up, and in eight patients after 24 months. Actuarial 2-year Trifecta failure-free survival rate was 44% (95% confidence interval 27-60%). In multivariate analysis no predictors of Trifecta failure were identified. Missing questionnaires was the main limitation of the study. CONCLUSION: The Trifecta and SCP classifications can be used as tools to report RT outcome.

Set-up errors in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy: Quantitative comparison between three-dimensional cone-beam CT and two-dimensional kilovoltage images.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the patient set-up error detection capabilities of three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (3D-CBCT) and two-dimensional orthogonal kilovoltage (2D-kV) techniques. METHODS: 3D-CBCT and 2D-kV projections were acquired on 29 head-and-neck (H&N) patients undergoing Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) on the first day of treatment (time 0) and after the delivery of 40 Gy and 50 Gy. Set-up correction vectors were analyzed after fully automatic image registration as well as after revision by radiation oncologists. The dosimetric effects of the different sensitivities of the two image guidance techniques were assessed. RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation among detected set-up deviations by the two techniques was found along anatomical axes (0.60 < ρ < 0.72, p < 0.0001); no correlation was found for table rotation (p = 0.41). No evidence of statistically significant differences between the indications provided along the course of the treatment was found; this was also the case when full automatic versus manually refined correction vectors were compared. The dosimetric effects analysis revealed slight statistically significant differences in the median values of the maximum relative dose to mandible, spinal cord and its 5 mm Planning Organ at Risk Volume (0.95%, 0.6% and 2.45%, respectively), with higher values (p < 0.01) observed when 2D-kV corrections were applied. CONCLUSION: A similar sensitivity to linear set-up errors was observed for 2D-kV and 3D-CBCT image guidance techniques in our H&N patient cohort. Higher rotational deviations around the table vertical axis were detected by the 3D-CBCT with respect to the 2D-kV method, leading to a consistent better sparing of organs at risk.

From wide excision to a compartmental approach in tongue tumors: what is going on?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Surgical approaches to tongue cancer have not changed substantially over the years. The literature proposes some indications for tumor excision even though type of intervention, resection margins, neck dissection, and 'en bloc' resection versus separate excision of tumor and lymph nodes do not seem to be standardized. The purpose of this review is to describe the evolution of surgical management of tongue carcinoma with particular attention to recent reports focusing on compartmental tongue surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: The current literature usually describes resection of tongue carcinoma within wide disease-free margins, ranging from 1.5 to 2 cm. In case of advanced-stage tumors, performing concomitant neck dissection is recommended; otherwise, a deferred neck dissection is indicated if depth of neoplastic infiltration exceeds 4 mm. In recent years, a new technical approach has been formulated based on anatomy of the tongue, thus, introducing the concept of an anatomy-based, function sparing, compartmental surgery. SUMMARY: Applying such a proposal to clinical practice aims at standardizing a surgical procedure that otherwise might be arbitrary. Compartmental surgery improves overall survival, does not seem to worsen functional outcomes of the residual tongue, and allows comparison of case studies.

Compartmental tongue surgery: Long term oncologic results in the treatment of tongue cancer.

Compartmental tongue surgery (CTS) is a surgical technique that removes the compartments (anatomo-functional units) containing the primary tumor, eliminating the disease and potential muscular, vascular, glandular and lymphatic pathways of spread and recurrence. Compartment boundaries are defined as each hemi-tongue bounded by the lingual septum, the stylohyoid ligament and muscle, and the mylohyoid muscle. In this non-randomized retrospective study we evaluated the oncologic efficacy of CTS in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the tongue treated from 1995 to 2008. We evaluated 193 patients with primary, previously untreated cT2-4a, cN0, cN+, M0 SCCA with no contraindication to anesthesia and able to give informed consent. Fifty patients treated between October 1995 and July 1999 received standard surgery (resection margin >1cm); 143 patients treated between July 1999 and January 2008 received CTS. Study endpoints were: 5-year local disease-free, locoregional disease-free and overall survival. After 5years, local disease control was achieved in 88.4% of CTS patients (16.8% improvement on standard surgery); locoregional disease control in 83.5% (24.4% improvement) and overall survival was 70.7% (27.3% improvement). The markedly improved outcomes in CTS patients, compared to those treated by standard surgery, suggest CTS as an important new approach in the surgical management of tongue cancer.