Assessment of adrenal function in cirrhotic patients using concentration of serum-free and salivary cortisol.

OBJECTIVE: Because over 90% of serum cortisol is bound to albumin and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), changes in these proteins can affect measures of serum total cortisol levels in cirrhotics without altering serum-free and salivary cortisol concentrations. METHODS: We assessed basal (T0) and post-synacthen (T60) serum total cortisol, serum-free and salivary cortisol in 125 consecutive cirrhotics (95 non-septic and 30 septic patients with a Child>8). RESULTS: Serum total cortisol levels significantly decreased from the Child A-C non-septic group, as did albumin and CBG levels, with a non-significant rise in serum-free cortisol concentrations. Non-septic patients with low albumin (≤25 g/L) or CBG levels (≤35 mg/L) had lower T0 serum total cortisol levels than patients with near-normal albumin (303.4 vs. 382.6 nmol/L; P=0.0035) or with normal CBG levels (289.9 vs. 441.4 nmol/L; P<0.0001), respectively, despite similar serum-free cortisol or salivary cortisol concentrations. Subnormal T60 serum total cortisol concentrations (<510.4 nmol/L) were measured in 7.2% of all patients (Child C: 14.5% vs. Child A and B: 0%; P=0.0013) but no patients exhibited symptoms suggesting adrenal insufficiency. Patients with or without subnormal T60 total cortisol had similar T0 salivary cortisol and serum-free cortisol concentrations. A trend was observed towards high serum-free cortisol concentrations and mortality in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Serum total cortisol levels overestimated the prevalence of adrenal dysfunction in cirrhotics with end-stage liver disease. Since serum-free cortisol cannot be measured routinely, salivary cortisol testing could represent a useful approach but needs to be standardized.

Free prolactin determinations in hyperprolactinemic men with suspicion of macroprolactinemia.

BACKGROUND: The Elecsys prolactin (PRL) assay reacts more strongly with macroprolactin than the Centaur PRL assay. We evaluated Elecsys direct and free PRL measurements vs. Centaur direct PRL measurements, in sera with and without macroprolactin. METHODS: PRL was measured using Elecsys and Centaur direct assays and the Elecsys assay in the supernatant obtained after PEG precipitation (free PRL) in 34 sera from 34 hyperprolactinemic male subjects (Elecsys direct PRL>434 mIU/l) classified, according to the PRL recovery after PEG precipitation, as: negative, i.e. without predominant macroprolactin (recovery %>50, n=12), positive (recovery %<40, n=18) or indeterminate (n=4). RESULTS: The positive bias between Elecsys direct and Centaur PRL results was clearly influenced by the presence of macroprolactin and the mean bias between Elecsys free and Centaur prolactin values was near zero in the negative and positive groups. Among 14 patients from the positive group presenting clinical conditions possibly ascribable to hyperprolactinemia, Elecsys free and Centaur PRL levels were normal in seven and increased in five. In the negative and positive groups considered together, Elecsys free PRL agreed well with Centaur prolactin (28/30). The poor concordance observed for the indeterminate samples underlined the heterogeneity of macroprolactin. CONCLUSION: Elecsys free PRL determination can be used to reduce the marked influence of macroprolactin in this assay.