Gastroesophageal reflux disease: key messages for clinicians.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic common disorder for which patients often refer to specialists. In the last decades, numerous studies helped to clarify the pathophysiology and the natural history of this disease. Currently, in the clinical setting, GERD is defined by the presence of symptoms that, when endoscopic investigation is required, permit to distinguish between cases with or without associated esophageal mucosal injuries. These conditions are called erosive reflux disease and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), respectively. The latter is the most common manifestation of GERD. Symptoms are defined typical, as heartburn and regurgitation, and atypical (also called extra-esophageal), as coughing and/or wheezing, hoarseness, sore throat, otitis media, and dental manifestations. In this context, it is crucial for clinicians to investigate the presence of features of suspected malignancy, as unexplained weight loss, anemia, dysphagia, persistent vomiting, familiar history of cancer, long history of GERD, and beginning of GERD symptoms after the age of 50 years. The presence of these risk factors should induce to perform an endoscopic examination. Particular attention should be given to functional conditions that can mimic GERD, such as functional heartburn and hypersensitive esophagus as well as, more rarely, eosinophilic esophagitis. The former ones have different pathophysiology and this explains the frequent non-response to proton pump inhibitor drugs. This narrative review provides to clinicians a useful and practical overview of the state-of-the-art on advancements in the knowledge of GERD.

Incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and glucose abnormalities in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection by response to treatment: results of a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic hepatitis C are at risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and this risk may increase among hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients not responding to an antiviral therapy. AIM: To compare the incidence of glucose abnormalities (IFG or DM) after an antiviral therapy between HCV+ patients with a long-term virological response (LTR) and nonresponders (NR; persistently positive HCV-RNA). METHODS: All 202 HCV+ patients without the baseline glucose abnormalities enrolled by our center in investigational trials or routinely treated with interferon (IFN)/peginterferon (Peg-IFN) (+/- ribavirin) from 1988 to 2001, with the available baseline sera stored at -80 degrees C, were considered. The baseline data included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), viral load, genotype, liver histologic staging and steatosis, glucose, and cholesterol. The homeostatic assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated in the baseline serum. The incidence of IFG or DM at the end of follow-up was compared between patients with LTR and NR. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 8.0 yr (range 5-16), the cumulative risk of DM (N = 7) or IFG (N = 33) among the 202 HCV+ included patients was 16.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.3-22.5). The 8-yr risk was not significantly lower between LTRs (14.5%) compared to NRs (18.8%) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, CI 0.30-1.20, P= 0.16). The HR adjusted for the baseline risk factors for DM and the predictors of a poor response (age, sex, HOMA-IR, BMI, family history of diabetes, HCV genotype 1, high viral load, cirrhosis, and steatosis) was 0.88 (CI 0.38-2.02, P= 0.76). Among other factors, those more associated to IFG-DM were an increasing age (P= 0.017), a higher BMI (P= 0.054), and a family history of DM (P= 0.065). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for several baseline risk factors, the incidence of glucose abnormalities was not significantly different between LTRs and NRs. Our data suggest that HCV clearance does not significantly reduce the risk of glucose intolerance.

Evaluation of Clensia®, a new low-volume PEG bowel preparation in colonoscopy: Multicentre randomized controlled trial versus 4L PEG.

BACKGROUND: Success of colonoscopy is linked to the adequacy of bowel cleansing. Polyethylene glycol 4L (PEG 4L) solutions are widely used for colonic cleansing but with limitations concerning tolerability and acceptability. AIM: To demonstrate the equivalence of a new low-volume PEG containing citrates and simeticone (Clensia) versus a standard PEG 4L. METHODS: In this, multicentre, randomised, observer-blind trial, patients received either Clensia 2L or PEG 4L solution. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with colon cleansing evaluated as excellent or good. RESULTS: 422 patients received Clensia (n=213) or PEG 4L (n=209). Rate of excellent/good bowel cleansing was 73.6% and 72.3% in Clensia and PEG 4L group respectively. Clensia was demonstrated to be equivalent to PEG 4L. No SAEs were observed. Clensia showed better gastrointestinal tolerability (37.0% vs 25.4%). The acceptability was significantly better with Clensia in terms of proportion of subjects who felt no distress (Clensia 72.8% vs PEG 4L 63%, P=0.0314) and willingness-to-repeat (93.9% vs 82.2%, P=0.0002). The rate of optimal compliance was similar with both formulations (91.1% for Clensia vs 90.9% for PEG 4L, P=0.9388). CONCLUSIONS: The low-volume Clensia is equally effective and safe in bowel cleansing compared to the standard PEG 4L, with better gastrointestinal tolerability and acceptability.

Durability of the response to peginterferon-α2b and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a cohort study in the routine clinical setting.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether, in chronic hepatitis C-positive naive patients recruited in the routine clinical setting and treated with pegylated-interferon-α2b (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), the sustained virologic response (SVR) is durable over the long term and whether it is associated with a decrease in liver complications and incidence of glucose abnormalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective long-term follow-up study of 182 naive patients enrolled in 2001-2002 and treated with Peg-IFN and RBV and followed up to December 2010, with clinical, biochemical, and virological evaluations every 6-12 months. RESULTS: None of the 115 (63.2%) sustained responders showed late viremic relapse during the follow-up. SVR was better defined at 24 weeks (16/16 relapsers, 100%) than at 12 weeks after the end of therapy (14/16 relapsers, 87.5%). On multivariable analysis, viral genotype (odds ratio 0.16, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.36, P=0.0001) and a greater than 20% RBV reduction (odds ratio 5.21, 95% confidence interval 1.54-17.67, P=0.008) predicted long-term response (LTR) independently. The incidence of cirrhosis was significantly higher among nonresponders (21.3%) compared with long-term responders (0.9%, P≤0.0001), but the risk of developing glucose abnormalities was not significantly reduced in long-term responders (hazard ratio 1.36, P=0.363). Hepatocellular carcinoma occurred only in three cases. CONCLUSION: SVR achieved in patients treated in the routine clinical setting with Peg-IFN and RBV is durable over the long term and LTR significantly reduces the risk of progression to cirrhosis; however, in a population with mild liver fibrosis, the clinical impact of LTR on the risk of glucose abnormalities seems negligible.

Temporary placement of an expandable polyester silicone-covered stent for treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures.

BACKGROUND: Benign, refractory esophageal strictures are an important therapeutic challenge. Metal stents occasionally have been used, but results have been disappointing. The present study assessed the safety and the efficacy of temporary placement of the new expandable polyester silicone-covered stent for management of problematic esophageal strictures. METHODS: Fifteen patients with benign esophageal strictures were treated by temporary (6 weeks) placement of an expandable polyester silicone-covered stent. All patients had previously been treated, unsuccessfully, by repetitive endoscopic dilation. RESULTS: Stent placement was successful in all patients. There was no procedure-related complication. Dilation with over-the-guidewire polyvinyl dilators was required before stent placement. With the stent in situ, dysphagia completely resolved in all patients. Six weeks after placement, one stent was found to have migrated into the stomach. In the remaining patients, the stent was easily removed with a foreign body forceps. The pretreatment dysphagia score was 3 (range 2-4); the post-treatment score was 1 (range 0-1) (p < 0.0005). Long-term resolution (mean follow-up 22.7 [2.6] months) of the stricture was achieved in 12 patients (80%). The treatment failed in 3 patients, all of whom continue to require periodic dilation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with benign esophageal strictures refractory to conventional dilation, temporary placement of a removable expandable polyester silicone-covered stent may lead to long-term relief of dysphagia with minimal morbidity.