STARTVerso1: A randomized trial of faldaprevir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype-1 infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy and tolerability of faldaprevir, a potent hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, plus peginterferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype-1 infection. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:2:2) to PegIFN/RBV plus: placebo (arm 1, n = 132) for 24 weeks; faldaprevir (120 mg, once daily) for 12 or 24 weeks (arm 2, n = 259); or faldaprevir (240 mg, once daily) for 12 weeks (arm 3, n = 261). In arms 2 and 3, patients with early treatment success (HCV-RNA <25 IU/ml at week 4 and undetectable at week 8) stopped all treatment at week 24. Other patients received PegIFN/RBV until week 48 unless they met futility criteria. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). RESULTS: SVR12 was achieved by 52%, 79%, and 80% of patients in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively (estimated difference for arms 2 and 3 vs. arm 1: 27%, 95% confidence interval 17%-36%; and 29%, 95% confidence interval, 19%-38%, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both). Early treatment success was achieved by 87% (arm 2) and 89% (arm 3) of patients, of whom 86% and 89% achieved SVR12. Adverse event rates were similar among groups; few adverse events led to discontinuation of all regimen components. CONCLUSIONS: Faldaprevir plus PegIFN/RBV significantly increased SVR12, compared with PegIFN/RBV, in treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype-1 infection. No differences were seen in responses of patients given faldaprevir once daily at 120 or 240 mg.

Telaprevir drug monitoring during antiviral therapy of hepatitis C graft infection after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after orthotopical liver transplantation (OLT) is common and associated with reduced graft and patient survival. The protease inhibitor telaprevir may enhance virological response rates in patients after OLT in combination with pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown significant drug-drug interactions between telaprevir and immunosuppression (IS), but telaprevir pharmacokinetics in OLT patients with IS are unknown. Aim of the present study was to analyse telaprevir plasma concentrations in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection after OLT in comparison to patients without OLT and IS. METHODS: Five patients with HCV genotype 1 infection after OLT and 37 HCV genotype 1-infected patients patients without prior OLT were treated with telaprevir 2250 mg daily, ribavirin 1000/1200 mg daily and pegylated interferon-alfa-2a 180 µg once weekly (triple therapy). Telaprevir plasma concentrations were analysed by liquid chromatography-electrospray-ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. HCV RNA was assessed by automatized reverse-transcription polymerase chain-reaction. RESULTS: Median (range) telaprevir plasma concentrations of TW 4, 8 and 12 were 3970 (1980-4430) ng/ml and 2520 (1870-8730) ng/ml in patients after OLT and ciclosporin- or tacrolimus-based IS, respectively, as compared to 2790 (1870-3140) in non-OLT patients (P = 0.3). In one patient with tacrolimus-based IS, telaprevir dose had to be adjusted to achieve virological response. Telaprevir plasma concentrations were steady at treatment weeks 4, 8 and 12 in patients with and without IS. CONCLUSIONS: Telaprevir drug monitoring may be necessary in patients with tacrolimus-based IS in patients with HCV graft infection after OLT.

Vitamin D level and sustained virologic response to interferon-based antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level has recently been reported to be an independent predictor of sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, studies have yielded inconsistent results. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify any association between baseline 25(OH)D level and SVR in HCV therapy. METHODS: Two reviewers searched four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane trials register) and relevant international conference proceedings up to March 2014 for studies treating chronic HCV infection with PEG-IFN plus RBV where baseline 25(OH)D level was tested. Studies involving patients with HIV co-infection, previous liver transplantation or those receiving vitamin D supplementation were excluded. The mean baseline 25(OH)D level was compared between those who achieved and those who failed to achieve SVR. Pooled standard difference in mean 25(OH)D level, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 2.0) using a random effects model. RESULTS: 11 studies comprising 2605 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant association between the baseline mean 25(OH)D level and SVR (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.92-2.26; p=0.11), either in patients infected with genotypes 1/4/5 (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.94-2.34; p=0.09) or genotypes 2/3 (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.26-8.87; p=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The baseline 25(OH)D level is not associated with SVR to PEG-IFN plus RBV therapy in chronic HCV infection, regardless of genotype. Any effect of vitamin D supplementation on SVR is yet to be definitively determined.

Clinical significance of residual viremia detected by two real-time PCR assays for response-guided therapy of HCV genotype 1 infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The duration of current standard dual and protease inhibitor-based triple therapies for chronic hepatitis C is determined by assessment of early viral kinetics. Little is known about differences between HCV RNA assays for the use in response guided therapy. METHODS: HCV RNA was assessed by two widely used real-time PCR-based assays, Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP), and Real-Time HCV (ART) in 903 samples of hepatitis C genotype 1 patients treated with dual (n=169) or telaprevir-based triple therapy (n=164) in three European countries. RESULTS: Overall, CAP and ART were in excellent agreement for the determination of HCV-RNA concentrations (mean difference 0.21 log10 IU/ml). For treatment-naïve patients treated with peginterferon-alfa and ribavirin a lower rate of undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 (RVR) was observed for ART (9%) vs. CAP (16%). Although 11/27 (41%) of patients with shortened treatment (24weeks) had detectable HCV-RNA <12IU/ml by ART at week 4 none of these patients experienced virologic relapse after treatment cessation. In patients who received triple therapy, 67% and 37% had undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 by CAP and ART, respectively. However, 18/31 (58%) eligible patients for shortened treatment based on CAP had detectable HCV-RNA by ART at week 4. Again, relapse was not observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lower rates of undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 were observed with ART compared to CAP in patients treated with dual and triple therapies. For ART, detectable <12IU/ml HCV-RNA levels at week 4 may be sufficient as part of the criteria used for selecting patients who receive a shortened treatment regimen.

Role of telaprevir plasma levels for predicting response to antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.

OBJECTIVE: Telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy has substantially improved cure rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection but side effects are frequent and often severe. Therefore, response predictors are needed for early identification of patients not responding to TVR-based triple therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five patients (mean age: 54 ± 13 years; male gender: 60%; treatment-experienced: 82%; cirrhosis: 58%) with HCV genotype 1 infection were treated with a TVR-based triple-therapy regimen. TVR plasma levels were analyzed by liquid chromatography electrospray-ionization-tandem mass spectrometry at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 of antiviral therapy. On-treatment HCV RNA response was assessed at weeks 4, 12, and 24 by real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: An extended rapid virological response (eRVR) and sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 21 of 45 patients (47%) and 36 of 45 (80%) patients, respectively. Mean ± standard deviation TVR plasma levels at week 2 were 3.4 ± 0.2 log10 ng/ml and did not differ over time (when assessed at weeks 4, 8, and 12). TVR plasma levels at week 2 were significantly higher in patients who achieved an eRVR compared to those who did not achieve eRVR (3.5 ± 0.1 vs. 3.3 ± 0.2 log10 ng/ml; p = 0.003) but were neither associated with SVR nor with treatment-related anemia. CONCLUSION: TVR plasma levels are associated with on-treatment response but not with overall treatment efficacy. Given the high overall response rates to TVR-based triple therapy, our data suggest that TVR trough levels may not be a useful predictor of treatment response, and routine drug-level monitoring is not required.

Prediction of minimal residual viremia in HCV type 1 infected patients receiving interferon-based therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Complete suppression of viral replication is crucial in chronic HCV treatment in order to prevent relapse and resistance development. We wanted to find out which factors influence the period from being already HCV RNA negative by bDNA assay (< 615 IU/mL) to become undetectable by the more sensitive TMA test (< 5.3 IU/mL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Evaluated were 433 HCV type 1-infected patients. All of them received 1.5 ug/kg Peg-IFNα-2b plus ribavirin for 18-48 weeks. bDNA was performed weekly during the first 8 weeks and thereafter at weeks 12, 24, and 48. Patients who became bDNA undetectable were additionally analysed by TMA. RESULTS: Of the 309 patients with on-treatment response (< 615 IU/mL), 289 also reached undetectable HCV RNA levels by TMA. Multivariate analysis revealed that viremia ≤ 400,000 IU/mL (p = 0.001), fast initial virologic decline (p = 0.004) and absence of fibrosis (p = 0.035) were independent predictors of an accelerated on-treatment response by TMA assay in already bDNA negative patients. bDNA negative patients becoming HCV RNA undetectable by TMA within the following 3 weeks had a frequency of relapse of 21%, whereas those showing TMA negativity after 3 weeks relapsed in 38% (p = 0.001). In RVR patients (bDNA < 615 IU/mL at week 4) the corresponding relapse rates were 15.3% vs. 37.5%, respectively (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Early viral kinetics, baseline viremia and fibrosis stage are important tools to predict persistent minimal viremia during interferon-based therapy. The data have implications for designing a more refined treatment strategy in HCV infection, even in the setting of protease inhibitor-based triple treatment.

Antiviral strategies in hepatitis C virus infection.

Resolution of the three-dimensional structures of several hepatitis C virus (HCV) proteins, together with the development of replicative cell culture systems, has led to the identification of a number of potential targets for direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents. Numerous families of drugs that potently inhibit the HCV lifecycle in vitro have been identified, and some of these molecules have reached early to late clinical development. Two NS3/4A protease inhibitors, telaprevir and boceprevir, were approved in Europe and the United States in 2011 in combination with pegylated interferon (IFN)-α and ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C related to HCV genotype 1, in both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. Sustained virological response rates in the range of 6675% and 5966% (2988% if the response to the first course of therapy is taken into account) have been achieved in these two patient populations, respectively, with treatment durations of 24 to 48 weeks. A number of other DAAs are at the clinical developmental stage in combination with pegylated IFN-α and ribavirin or with other DAAs in IFN-free regimens, with or without ribavirin. They include second-wave, first-generation, and second-generation NS3/4A protease inhibitors, nucleoside/nucleotide analogue inhibitors and non-nucleoside inhibitorsof HCVRNA-dependent RNA polymerase, inhibitors of nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) and host-targeted compounds, such as cyclophilin inhibitors and silibinin. The proof of concept that IFN-free regimens may lead to HCV eradication has recently been brought. However, new drugs may be associated with troublesome side effects and drugdrug interactions, and the ideal IFN-free DAA combination remains to be found.

Improved responses to pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin by individualizing treatment for 24-72 weeks.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines recommend that patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection be treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for 24, 48, or 72 weeks, based on their virologic response to treatment. We investigated the effects of treating patients for individualized durations. METHODS: We treated 398 treatment-naïve patients who had HCV genotype 1 infections with pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 60, or 72 weeks (mean of 39 weeks, termed individualized therapy); the duration of therapy was determined based on baseline viral load and the time point at which HCV RNA levels became undetectable (measured at weeks 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 30). Results were compared with those of 225 patients who received standard treatment for 48 weeks (mean of 38 weeks). RESULTS: Rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) were 55% among patients who received individualized treatment and 48% among those who received standard treatment (P < .0001 for noninferiority). SVR rates, according to the time point at which HCV RNA levels became undetectable, did not differ significantly between groups. Patients with a rapid virologic response (undetectable levels of HCV RNA at week 4) who were treated for 24 to 30 weeks achieved high rates of SVR (86%-88%). Rates of SVR increased among slow responders who first tested negative for HCV RNA at week 24 and were treated for 60 to 72 weeks compared with those treated for 48 weeks (60%-68% vs 43%-44%). The CC polymorphism at IL28B rs129797860 was associated with an increased rate of SVR compared with the CT/TT polymorphism (P < .0001) at baseline but not among patients who had undetectable levels of HCV RNA following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Individualizing treatment of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infections for 24 to 72 weeks results in high rates of SVR among rapid responders and increases SVR among slow responders.

Importance of minimal residual viremia for relapse prediction in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection.

This study demonstrates that a more precise prediction of the individual relapse risk in chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection can be obtained by kinetics of minimal residual viremia at weeks 4, 8, and 12 in combination with levels of baseline viremia. These data may also help to further individualize new protease inhibitor-based triple therapy regimens.

Role of nucleoside transporters SLC28A2/3 and SLC29A1/2 genetics in ribavirin therapy: protection against anemia in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The standard of hepatitis C antiviral therapy combines pegylated interferon-α with ribavirin. This polar guanosine analog improves the sustained virological response (SVR) rates, but may induce hemolytic anemia. As its pharmacokinetics depend on facilitated transmembrane transport, we assessed whether variants in genes that code for concentrative (concentrative nucleoside transporters 2 and 3 coded by SLC28A2 and SLC28A3, respectively) and equilibrative nucleoside transporters (equilibrative nucleoside transporters 1 and 2 coded by SLC29A1 and SLC29A2, respectively) are associated with the therapy response and side effects. METHODS: Patients (n=169) chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus genotype 1, treated with standard doses of pegylated interferon-α and weight-based doses of ribavirin for up to 48 weeks, were genotyped for 21 variants in nucleoside transporter genes SLC28A2, SLC28A3, SLC29A1, and SLC29A2, selected to include reported functional variants and to span the complete gene loci. The presence or absence of a SVR (n=169) and a relevant decrease (>3 g/dl, n=115) in blood hemoglobin were associated with the genotypes. RESULTS: The variant SLC28A3 haplotype rs10868138G/rs56350726T (allelic frequency 0.074) was associated with a lower incidence (35.5%) of relevant decreases (>3 g/dl) in blood hemoglobin than in noncarriers (64.3%; P=0.024, n=115). This protection against hemolytic anemia was not associated with decreased SVR rates (n=169). CONCLUSION: A genetic variant in SCL28A3 coding for the concentrative nucleoside transporter 3 protects patients with chronic hepatitis C against hemolytic anemia without affecting SVR in hepatitis C virus genotype 1.

Impact of donor and recipient IL28B rs12979860 genotypes on hepatitis C virus liver graft reinfection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recent studies have described a major impact of genetic variations near the IL28B gene on the natural course and outcome of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C. We therefore, aimed to explore the impact of donor and recipient genotypes of these polymorphisms on hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver graft reinfection. METHODS: Donor and recipient genotypes of IL28B rs12979860C>T single nucleotide polymorphism were determined in 91 patients with HCV liver graft reinfection, 47 of whom were treated with pegylated interferon-α (PEG-IFN-α) and ribavirin. IL28B genetic polymorphisms were correlated with the natural course and treatment outcome of recurrent hepatitis C. RESULTS: Patients requiring liver transplantation due to end-stage chronic hepatitis C appeared to be selected toward the adverse genotypes rs12979860 CT/TT compared to non-transplanted HCV-infected patients (p=0.046). Patients with the donor genotype rs12979860 CC had higher peak ALT and HCV RNA serum concentrations than those with CT/TT (p=0.04 and 0.06, respectively). No association was observed between ALT/HCV RNA serum concentrations and recipient genotypes (p>0.3). More important, donor IL28B rs12979860 CC vs. CT/TT genotypes were associated with rapid, complete early, and sustained virologic response (RVR, cEVR, SVR) to treatment with PEG-IFN-α and ribavirin (p=0.003, 0.0012, 0.008, respectively), but weaker associations of recipient genotypes with RVR, cEVR, and SVR were observed as well (p=0.0046, 0.115, 0.118, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence for a dominant, but not exclusive impact of the donor rather than the recipient IL28B genetic background on the natural course and treatment outcome of HCV liver graft reinfection.

Randomized trial of peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 48 or 72 weeks in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and slow virologic response.

UNLABELLED: The benefit of extending treatment duration with peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) from 48 weeks to 72 weeks for patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection has not been well established. In this prospective, international, open-label, randomized, multicenter study, 1,428 treatment-naïve patients from 133 centers were treated with PEG-IFN alfa-2b (1.5 µg/kg/week) plus RBV (800-1,400 mg/day). Patients with detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and a ≥2-log(10) drop in HCV RNA levels at week 12 (slow responders) were randomized 1:1 to receive 48 weeks (n = 86) or 72 weeks (n = 73) of treatment. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 43% in slow responders treated for 48 weeks and 48% in slow responders treated for 72 weeks (P = 0.644). Relapse rates were similar in slow responders treated for 48 or 72 weeks (47% versus 33%, P = 0.169). The safety profile was similar in both treatment arms; serious adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were observed in 3.5% of slow responders treated for 48 weeks and 8.2% of those treated for 72 weeks. Among slow responders with a <2-log drop in HCV RNA at week 8, SVR was 39% in the 72-week arm and 19% in the 48-week arm. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that 48 weeks of therapy with PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus RBV (800-1,400 mg/day) should remain a standard-of-care treatment for treatment-naïve G1 slow responders.

CD81 expression for discrimination between sustained virologic response and relapse in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The hepatitis C virus (HCV) receptor CD81 is overexpressed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in patients chronically infected with HCV compared with healthy controls, and expression declines during antiviral therapy. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate CD81 expression on PBMC for early discrimination between sustained virologic response (SVR) and relapse (REL) to pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin treatment. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with chronic HCV infection (genotype, GT, 1 and low baseline viremia <600,000 IU/ml, n = 30; GT 2 or 3, n = 31) were investigated. CD81 expression on CD4(+), CD8(+), CD19(+), and CD56(+) cells was measured at baseline, therapy week (TW) 4 and 12 during antiviral therapy by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. RESULTS: Baseline levels of CD81 on CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD56(+) cells were similar between patients who achieved a SVR (n = 42) and those who relapsed (n = 19). On CD19(+) cells, baseline CD81 expression was higher in patients with SVR than in patients with virologic relapse (REL) (p < 0.006). A cutoff value of 720 relative fluorescence units (RFU) discriminated correctly between SVR and REL with a sensitivity and specificity of 73.7% and 66.7%, respectively. SVR patients showed a significant decline of CD81 expression on CD4(+), CD8(+), CD19(+), and CD56(+) cells (p < 0.01 for all) while in REL patients a significant decline of CD81 expression was observed on CD8(+) and CD56(+) cells, only (p = 0.050 and p = 0.038, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current study confirms significant down-regulation of CD81 expression on different lymphocyte subpopulations during pegylated interferon alfa-based antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Baseline CD81 expression on CD19(+) cells was found to discriminate between SVR and REL.

HVR-1 heterogeneity during treatment with telaprevir with or without pegylated interferon alfa-2a.

BACKGROUND: The extensive heterogeneity of the hypervariable region-1 (HVR-1) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) evidences the high genetic flexibility of HCV and was shown to be associated with virologic response to interferon-α-based therapies. However, the evolution of HVR-1 heterogeneity during treatment with directly acting antivirals has not been studied. METHODS: Clonal sequence analysis of HVR-1 quasispecies in the serum of patients who were treated with telaprevir (3 × 750 mg/day) alone, telaprevir plus pegylated interferon-α-2a (pegIFN-α-2a), or pegIFN-α-2a plus placebo for 14 days was performed. HVR-1 heterogeneity, expressed as Shannon complexity and Hamming distance, was analyzed with virologic response and with the emergence of variants associated with resistance to telaprevir. RESULTS: HVR-1 heterogeneity at baseline was not associated with response to telaprevir-based therapy (Shannon complexity 0.34 vs. 0.55, p = 0.38; Hamming distance 0.15 vs. 0.23, p = 0.51; for patients with or without viral breakthrough, respectively). No significant changes in HVR-1 complexity were observed from baseline to day 4 of therapy in patients in whom a continued decline in HCV RNA was observed (Shannon complexity = 0.55 vs. 0.51, p = 0.67; Hamming distance = 0.23 vs. 0.25, p = 0.81, respectively). This was similar in patients with viral breakthrough associated with telaprevir-resistant variants (Shannon complexity = 0.34 vs. 0.42, p = 0.68; Hamming distance = 0.15 vs. 0.2, p = 0.50, at baseline and day 4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline and on-treatment HVR-1 heterogeneity are not associated with early viral response to telaprevir-based therapy.

Definition of rapid virologic response with a highly sensitive real-time PCR-based HCV RNA assay in peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin response-guided therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Assessing hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels is integral to response-guided therapy. Rules for early discontinuation and determination of treatment duration were mainly established with HCV-RNA assays with a detection limit of 50IU/ml (COBAS Amplicor HCV [CA]). The currently used real-time PCR-based COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS-TaqMan HCV (CAP-CTM) test has a detection limit of approximately 10IU/ml. It is unknown whether shortening of treatment duration to 16/24 weeks in patients with rapid virological response at week 4 (RVR) and viral loads between 10 and 50IU/ml is possible. METHODS: We reanalysed stored serum from two large, multinational, randomized trials in which patients were treated with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin (n=962). Results of CAP-CTM with truly undetectable HCV RNA and those <15IU/ml, which includes patients with residual viraemia (<15), were compared with the originally obtained results using the CA assay. RESULTS: RVR rates were comparable for CA (<50) and CAP-CTM (<15) with 32% and 32% for genotype (gt) 1 and 50% and 49% for gt2/3 patients, respectively. A significantly smaller number of samples really had truly undetectable HCV RNA by the CAP-CTM assay (24% for gt1, 37% for gt2/3). However, sustained virological response rates after shortened treatment (16/24weeks) were not significantly different in patients with a RVR <50, a RVR <15 and RVR undetectable (82%, 83%, 83% for 24weeks gt1 and 95%, 95%, 94% for 16weeks gt2/3). CONCLUSIONS: Shortening the treatment duration to 16/24weeks can be performed on the basis of a RVR with HCV-RNA concentrations <15IU/ml by the CAP-CTM assay.

Meta-analysis shows extended therapy improves response of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinical trials provided conflicting results about whether extended duration of treatment with pegylated interferon-alfa (pegIFN-alfa) and ribavirin (more than 48 weeks) improves rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and slow virologic response. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the overall impact of extended treatment, compared with standard treatment, on virologic response rates in these patients. METHODS: We performed a literature search to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included monoinfected, treatment-naive patients infected with HCV genotype 1; data were compared between slow responding patients treated with pegIFN-alfa-2a/b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks and those that received extended treatment (as much as 72 weeks). End points included SVR rates, end-of-treatment (EOT) response and relapse rates; they were calculated according to the DerSimonian-Laird estimate. RESULTS: Six RCTs assessed the benefits of extended treatment with pegIFN-alfa-2a/b and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 that were slow responders (n = 669). The extended treatment significantly improved SVR rates in slow responders, compared with the standard of care (14.7% increase in overall SVR; 95% confidence interval, 4%-25.5%; P = .0072). Rates of viral relapse were significantly reduced by extended treatment, but EOT response rates were similar. The frequency of voluntary treatment discontinuation, but not of serious adverse events, was significantly increased by extended therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the duration of treatment with pegIFN-alfa-2a/b and ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 and a slow response to therapy improves the rate of SVR.

Individualized treatment strategy according to early viral kinetics in hepatitis C virus type 1-infected patients.

UNLABELLED: Individualized treatment on the basis of early viral kinetics has been discussed to optimize antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Individually tailored reduction in treatment duration in HCV type 1-infected patients represents one possible strategy. Four hundred thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.5 microg/kg peginterferon alfa-2b weekly plus 800-1,400 mg ribavirin daily for 48 weeks (n = 225, group A) or an individually tailored treatment duration (18-48 weeks; n = 208, group B). In the latter group, treatment duration was calculated using the time required to induce HCV RNA negativity (branched DNA [bDNA] assay; sensitivity limit, 615 IU/mL) multiplied by the factor 6. All bDNA negative samples were retested with the more sensitive transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay (sensitivity limit, 5.3 IU/mL). Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were significantly lower in group B (34.6% versus 48.0% [P = 0.005]) due to higher relapse rates (32.7% versus 14.2% [P< 0.0005]). Important predictors of response were the levels of baseline viremia as well as the time to TMA negativity on treatment. Taking the simultaneous presence of low baseline viral load (<800,000 IU/mL) and a negative TMA test within the first 4 weeks as predictors for treatment response, SVR rates were comparable between both treatment schedules with an SVR probability of >80% obtained in patients treated for only 18 or 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: The individualized treatment strategy according to time to bDNA negativity failed to provide comparable efficacy compared with the standard of care. The inferiority of the individualized protocol may be explained by the use of a less sensitive HCV RNA assay, and also by underestimation of the importance of baseline viremia.

Early viraemia clearance during antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C improves dendritic cell functions.

Plasma and cellular HCV RNA and core antigen were tested in monocyte-derived DC (MDDC) from chronic hepatitis C patients undergoing treatment with peg-interferon alpha2b/ribavirin. DC allostimulatory capacity, HCV-specific T-cell reactivity and IL-12 production were measured at baseline and treatment week (TW)12. Using DC and autologous CD4(+)T-cells, obtained at baseline and TW12, we performed cross-over experiments to determine the relative role of DC and/or T-cells for impaired immune reactivity to HCV. HCV RNA and HCV core plasma levels had an impact on DC phenotype and allostimulatory capacity. In contrast, HCV genome/core protein, although detectable in DC from some patients had no effect on DC function. Antiviral immunity at TW12 was not improved in patients who remained HCV RNA positive, while early viraemia clearance (TW12) improved antiviral responses. The cross-over experiment revealed that changes in DC, rather than CD4(+)T cells have a major role for enhanced anti-HCV responses.

Ribavirin mode of action in chronic hepatitis C: from clinical use back to molecular mechanisms.

Ribavirin is an old broad-spectrum antiviral that is highly effective when used in combination with interferon-alpha and also as part of triple therapies containing new inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) non-structural (NS)3/4 protease or HCV NS5B polymerase for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. However, the molecular mechanisms by which ribavirin enhances early and sustained virological response rates during interferon-based antiviral HCV therapy are still unknown. Several mechanisms including (i) immunomodulatory properties, (ii) inhibition of the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, (iii) direct inhibition of the HCV-encoded NS5B RNA polymerase, (iv) induction of lethal mutagenesis and (v) modulation of interferon-stimulated gene expression are currently proposed. Here, we discuss recent advances from in vitro data and their importance for the situation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Furthermore, theoretical aspects from mathematical modelling of ribavirin action in chronic hepatitis C are reviewed.