Injectable Double Crosslinked Hydrogel-Polypropylene Composite Mesh for Repairing Full-Thickness Abdominal Wall Defects.

Abdominal wall defects are common clinical diseases, and mesh repair is the standard treatment method. The most commonly used polypropylene (PP) mesh in clinical practice has the advantages of good mechanical properties, stable performance, and effective tissue integration effect. However, direct contact between abdominal viscera and PP mesh can lead to severe abdominal adhesions. To prevent this, the development of a hydrogel-PP composite mesh with anti-adhesive properties may be an effective measure. Herein, biofunctional hydrogel loaded with rosmarinic acid is developed by modifying chitosan and Pluronic F127, which possesses suitable physical and chemical properties and commendable in vitro biocompatibility. In the repair of full-thickness abdominal wall defects in rats, hydrogels are injected onto the surface of PP mesh and applied to intraperitoneal repair. The results indicate that the use of hydrogel-PP composite mesh can alleviate abdominal adhesions resulting from traditional PP mesh implantation by decreasing local inflammatory response, reducing oxidative stress, and regulating the fibrinolytic system. Combined with the tissue integration ability of PP mesh, hydrogel-PP composite mesh has great potential for repairing full-thickness abdominal wall defects.

The salvage of mesh infection after hernia repair with the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Mesh infection is the most feared postoperative complication after abdominal wall hernia repair, often needs mesh removal. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used in these situations with diverse results. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the NPWT in the treatment of mesh infection, the primary outcome was the mesh salvage rates of different type of meshes and mesh positions. METHODS: Major databases were searched using the keywords negative pressure wound therapy, VSD, vacuum assisted, hernia, mesh infection, including various combinations of the terms. All relevant articles and reference lists in these original studies were also obtained from the above databases. RESULTS: Ten articles containing 265 patients on the treatment of mesh infection after hernia repair with the use of NPWT method were included. The general infected mesh salvage rate with NPWT was 76.2%. The highest mesh salvage rate was achieved in polypropylene mesh (93.5%), followed by Proceed mesh (83.3%), and the mesh salvage rate was lower in polyester mesh (PCO) (0%) and the ePTFE mesh (14/3%). The salvage rate was higher when mesh placed in the onlay position (82.6%) or retromuscular/sublay position (98.5%), but lower in the IPOM position (55.6%). CONCLUSION: The treatment of mesh infection after hernia repair should be individualized according to the mesh type, mesh position and the severity of infection. Infected mesh with favourable mesh materials (large pore and monofilament polypropylene) and favourable positions (onlay or sublay/retromuscular) can be salvaged with the use of NPWT based conservative method.

Polypropylene mesh combined with electrospun poly (L-lactic acid) membrane in situ releasing sirolimus and its anti-adhesion efficiency in rat hernia repair.

This study developed, a novel polypropylene (PP) mesh combined with poly (L-lactic acid) (PLA) electrospun nanofibers loaded sirolimus (SRL). The PP mesh was combined with PLA/SRL (1/0, 1/0.01, 1/0.02; mass ratios) composed electrospun membrane characterized by FTIR spectroscopy, XPS and SEM, and evaluated for cytocompatibility in vitro. In an in vivo study, a total of 84 Sprague-Dawley rats were employed to evaluate the efficacy of the novel composite PP mesh anti-adhesion, mechanical properties and inflammation. As a results, the PLA/SRL membrane could compound with PP mesh stably and load SRL. Although tensile testing showed that the mechanical properties of composite mesh decreased in vivo, the integration strength between the tissue and mesh was still able to counteract intra-abdominal pressure. Compared with the native PP mesh group, the novel PP mesh group showed a lower score for abdominal adhesion and inflammation. More importantly, the novel PP mesh completely integrated with the abdominal wall and had sufficient mechanical strength to repair abdominal wall defects.