Evaluation of two treatment concepts of four implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently, oblique placement of long implants or the use of short implants to circumvent the maxillary sinus area and provide support for fixed prostheses are viable alternatives. The purpose of this study was to compare these two treatment concepts and ascertain which one exhibits superior biomechanical characteristics. METHODS: Two different treatment concept models were constructed. The first one, LT4I, consisting of two mesial vertical implants positioned in lateral incisor regions and two distal tilted implants (45°) situated in second premolar regions of the maxilla. The second model, VS4I, includes two mesial vertical implants in lateral incisor regions and two vertically positioned short implants in second premolar regions. Numerical simulations were conducted under three loading types: firstly, oblique forces upon the molars; secondly, vertical forces upon the molars; thirdly, oblique forces upon the incisors. The maximum principal stress (σmax) and minimum principal stress (σmin) of the bone, as well as von Mises stress of the implants, were calcuated. RESULTS: Under oblique loading on the molar, higher stress values in the bone were observed in LT4I group. Under vertical loading on molar, higher stress values in the bone were also observed in LT4I group. Furthermore, little difference was found between the two groups under oblique loading on the incisor. CONCLUSION: Both treatment concepts can be applicable for edentulous individuals with moderate atrophic maxilla. Compared to tilted implants, short implants can transmit less occlusal force to the supporting tissues.

Enantiomer-Dependent Supramolecular Immunosuppressive Modulation for Tissue Reconstruction.

Modulating the properties of biomaterials in terms of the host immune response is critical for tissue repair and regeneration. However, it is unclear how the preference for the cellular microenvironment manipulates the chiral immune responses under physiological or pathological conditions. Here, we reported that in vivo and in vitro oligopeptide immunosuppressive modulation was achieved by manipulation of macrophage polarization using chiral tetrapeptide (Ac-FFFK-OH, marked as FFFK) supramolecular polymers. The results suggested that chiral FFFK nanofibers can serve as a defense mechanism in the restoration of tissue homeostasis by upregulating macrophage M2 polarization via the Src-STAT6 axis. More importantly, transiently acting STAT6, insufficient to induce a sustained polarization program, then passes the baton to EGR2, thereby continuously maintaining the M2 polarization program. It is worth noting that the L-chirality exhibits a more potent effect in inducing macrophage M2 polarization than does the D-chirality, leading to enhanced tissue reconstruction. These findings elucidate the crucial molecular signals that mediate chirality-dependent supramolecular immunosuppression in damaged tissues while also providing an effective chiral supramolecular strategy for regulating macrophage M2 polarization and promoting tissue injury repair based on the self-assembling chiral peptide design.