Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cytokine ; 111: 490-495, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29895395

RESUMO

It is unknown whether serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines would be high in children with early childhood caries (ECC). This study investigated the association between serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines and severity of caries in preschoolers younger than 72 months. A case-control study was performed with a random sample of 72 children with ECC and 80 caries-free children. The explanatory variables were serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and NGAL) and the outcome was severity of ECC (number of decayed teeth). Thecrudeanalyses were used toestimate the association between each cytokine and ECC. Then, the analyses were adjusted for socioeconomic factors, excess weight and sugar sweetened beverages consumption using Poisson regression models. The estimated coefficients were expressed as Means Ratio (MR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In the crude analyses, the highest tertiles of IL-6 (MR = 1.47, IC = 1.09-2.00, p = 0.012), TNF-α (MR = 1.33, CI = 1.00-1.78, p = 0.040) and NGAL (MR = 2.20, CI = 1.39-3.49, p = 0.001) were associated to ECC. After adjustment, the highest tertiles of IL-6 levels (MR = 1.54, IC = 1.13-2.10, p = 0.005), and NGAL (MR = 1.71, CI = 1.04-2.80, p = 0.032) remained associated to ECC; while TNF-α was no longer associated to ECC (MR = 1.31, CI = 0.98-1.75, p = 0.066). Higher serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines were associated to severity of caries in preschoolers, suggesting that chronic inflammation underlies ECC.


Assuntos
Citocinas/sangue , Cárie Dentária/sangue , Inflamação/sangue , Bebidas/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Int J Paediatr Dent ; 27(6): 532-539, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28222484

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A possible association between being overweight or obese and early childhood caries (ECC) remains controversial. AIM: To investigated this association in a developing country testing the confounding effects of socioeconomic factors and frequency of sugar consumption. METHODS: Historical cohort study, 388 children (aged 24-71 months) living in São Luís, Brazil. A theoretical model adjusted according to income, birthweight, and nutritional status at twelve months and frequency of sugar consumption was generated with directed acyclic graphs to analyze this association. Caries were considered a discrete variable in the Poisson regression models; incidence density ratios (IRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: Being overweight or obese (IR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.03-2.22) was independently associated with ECC. Being thin or very thin (IR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.52-2.54), a high frequency of sugar consumption (IR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.42-2.38), and age (IR = 3.62; 95% CI: 2.58-5.08) were associated with ECC. CONCLUSIONS: Children overweight or obese, as well as children exhibiting being thin/very thin, were associated with ECC independent of socioeconomic variables and a high frequency of sugar consumption.


Assuntos
Peso Corporal , Cárie Dentária/etiologia , Dieta , Açúcares da Dieta , Obesidade Infantil/complicações , Brasil , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Comportamento Alimentar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Biológicos , Obesidade/complicações , Sobrepeso/complicações , Magreza/complicações
3.
Braz Oral Res ; 33: e094, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31618294

RESUMO

This study aimed to analyze the association of sociodemographic, child health, healthcare service, and access indicators with developmental defects of enamel (DDE) acquired outside the uterus, based on gestational factors. A cohort of births was carried out, and 982 children aged 12 to 30 months were examined. A total of 1,500 women were followed up as of the 5th month of gestation, and the child's gestational age was evaluated at follow-up. The clinical examination was performed as recommended by the World Health Organization, and defects were classified using the modified DDE index. Six models were considered: presence of DDE (Model 1) or opacities (Model 4), number of teeth with DDE (Model 2) or opacities (Model 5), and incidence rate of DDE (Model 3) or opacities (Model 6). Associations were estimated by relative risk (RR) in Poisson regression models. In the adjusted analysis, the mother's lowest education level was associated with the highest occurrence of DDE in Models 1 (RR = 26.43; p = 0.002), 2 (RR = 9.70; p = 0.009), and 3 (RR = 5.63; p = 0.047). Breastfeeding for over 12 months (RR = 0.45; p = 0.030) and recent use of anti-infection drugs (RR = 0.20; p = 0.039) had a protective effect on DDE (Model 1). The factors associated with the highest incidence of opacities were not having health insurance (RR = 2.00; p = 0.043) (Model 5), and belonging to a family of poor social class (RR = 4.67; p = 0.007) (Model 6). Children in a situation of socioeconomic vulnerability have a higher risk of presenting extrauterine DDE. Breastfeeding was a protection factor for DDE development.


Assuntos
Hipoplasia do Esmalte Dentário/epidemiologia , Hipoplasia do Esmalte Dentário/etiologia , Esmalte Dentário/anormalidades , Brasil/epidemiologia , Aleitamento Materno , Pré-Escolar , Hipoplasia do Esmalte Dentário/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Modelos Teóricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Populações Vulneráveis
4.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 55: 12, 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - odontologia (Brasil) | ID: biblio-1289970

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence and factors associated with hesitancy in getting the vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Maranhão, Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional population-based study conducted from October 19 to 30, 2020. The estimates were calculated based on clustering, stratification, and non-response. A three-stage sampling was adopted, considering stratum, census tracts, and domicile. After systematic analysis, thirty sectors were selected in each stratum, totaling 150 sectors. Each sector contained a fixed number of 34 households, thus totaling 5,100 households. One individual within each household (resident for at least six months and aged one year or more) was selected by a simple random sampling. We questioned participants about their vaccination intention. Univariate association between independent variables and the outcome were verified using descriptive analysis (weighted frequencies) and Pearson's chi-square test (p < 0.05). Robust multivariate analysis was performed using a three-level hierarchical model. RESULTS: We found 17.5% (95%CI 16.1-19.1%) of the 4,630 individuals interviewed to report hesitancy to be vaccinated against covid-19. After final model adjustment, vaccination hesitancy was statistically higher among residents of the cities of Imperatriz (24.0%; RP = 1.48; IC95% 1.09-2.02) and municipalities of the Grande Ilha de São Luís (20.7%; RP = 1.34; 95%CI 1.02-1.76), female individuals (19.8%; RP = 1.44; 95%CI 1.20-1.75), older adults (22.8%; RP = 1.79; IC95% 1.30-2.46), evangelicals (24.1%; RP = 1.49; 95%CI 1.24-1.79), and those without reported symptoms (18.6%; RP = 1.24; 95%CI 1.02-1.51). We found no statistical differences for other socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, as well as variables related to the labor market, behaviors, and health conditions of the interviewees. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of vaccine hesitancy in Maranhão and its association with individual, contextual, and clinical factors enable us to identify the groups and contexts of greatest resistance, requiring special attention from public strategies to ensure wide vaccination.


RESUMO OBJETIVOS: Estimar a prevalência e fatores associados à hesitação ao uso da vacina contra o vírus SARS-CoV-2 no Maranhão, Brasil. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal de base populacional realizado de 19 a 30 de outubro de 2020. As estimativas consideraram agrupamento, estratificação e não resposta. A seleção da amostra foi realizada em três estágios (estrato, setores censitários e domicílio). Após análise sistemática, em cada estrato foram selecionados trinta setores, totalizando 150 setores, sendo o número de domicílios em cada setor fixado em 34, totalizando 5.100 domicílios e um indivíduo por domicílio (residente pelo menos há seis meses e com um ano de idade ou mais) selecionado por amostra aleatória simples. A intenção de ser vacinado foi questionada aos participantes. Foi realizada análise descritiva (frequências ponderadas) e teste do qui-quadrado de Pearson para verificar associação univariada entre as variáveis independentes e o desfecho (p < 0,05). Realizou-se análise multivariada robusta utilizando-se modelagem hierarquizada em três níveis. RESULTADOS: Foram entrevistados 4.630 indivíduos. A prevalência de hesitação vacinal foi de 17,5% (IC95% 16,1-19,1%). Após ajuste final do modelo, a hesitação vacinal foi estatisticamente maior entre moradores das cidades de Imperatriz (24,0%; RP = 1,48; IC95% 1,09-2,02) e de munícipios da Grande Ilha de São Luís (20,7%; RP = 1,34; IC95% 1,02-1,76), pessoas do sexo feminino (19,8%; RP = 1,44; IC95% 1,20-1,75), idosos (22,8%; RP = 1,79; IC95% 1,30-2,46), pertencentes às religiões de denominação evangélica (24,1%; RP = 1,49; IC95% 1,24-1,79) e entre aqueles sem relato de sintomas (18,6%; RP = 1,24; IC95% 1,02-1,51). Outras características socioeconômicas e demográficas, assim como variáveis relacionadas ao mercado de trabalho, comportamentos e condições de saúde dos entrevistados, não tiveram diferença estatística. CONCLUSÃO: A prevalência de hesitação vacinal no Maranhão e sua associação com fatores individuais, contextuais e clínicos revelam os grupos e contextos mais resistentes e que devem merecer atenção especial das estratégias públicas para garantir a ampla vacinação.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Vacinas , COVID-19 , Brasil , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 55: 1-12, 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - odontologia (Brasil) | ID: biblio-1347807

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To estimate the 2020 all-cause and COVID-19 excess mortality according to sex, age, race/color, and state, and to compare mortality rates by selected causes with that of the five previous years in Brazil. METHODS Data from the Mortality Information System were used. Expected deaths for 2020 were estimated from 2015 to 2019 data using a negative binomial log-linear model. RESULTS Excess deaths in Brazil in 2020 amounted to 13.7%, and the ratio of excess deaths to COVID-19 deaths was 0.90. Reductions in deaths from cardiovascular diseases (CVD), respiratory diseases, and external causes, and an increase in ill-defined causes were all noted. Excess deaths were also found to be heterogeneous, being higher in the Northern, Center-Western, and Northeastern states. In some states, the number of COVID-19 deaths was lower than that of excess deaths, whereas the opposite occurred in others. Moreover, excess deaths were higher in men aged 20 to 59, and in black, yellow, or indigenous individuals. Meanwhile, excess mortality was lower in women, in individuals aged 80 years or older, and in whites. Additionally, deaths among those aged 0 to 19 were 7.2% lower than expected, with reduction in mortality from respiratory diseases and external causes. There was also a drop in mortality due to external causes in men and in those aged 20 to 39 years. Moreover, reductions in deaths from CVD and neoplasms were noted in some states and groups. CONCLUSION There is evidence of underreporting of COVID-19 deaths and of the possible impact of restrictive measures in the reduction of deaths from external causes and respiratory diseases. The impacts of COVID-19 on mortality were heterogeneous among the states and groups, revealing that regional, demographic, socioeconomic, and racial differences expose individuals in distinct ways to the risk of death from both COVID-19 and other causes.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Brasil/epidemiologia , Mortalidade , Causas de Morte , População Branca , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 55: 35, 2021. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - odontologia (Brasil) | ID: biblio-1252109

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the epidemic of COVID-19 in northeastern Brazil, one of the regions most affected by the virus. METHODS The official data for COVID-19, from March 2020 to March 2021 in the states of the Northeast Region (NE), were used. The analysis of capital cities and states for accumulated weekly cases and confirmed deaths was made using the JoinPoint Trend Analysis application. RESULTS In one year, the Northeast region reported 22.9% of the cases and 21.5% of the deaths in the country due to COVID-19. At the beginning of the pandemic, all states showed a growing number of cases, first in the capitals and then in the interior. Following this wave, decreases are observed in all states and their capitals, but with many still reporting a large number of cases. In the middle of the 2nd semester of 2020 the number of cases begins to increase again simultaneously in states and their capitals—some at explosive speed—especially in late 2020 and early 2021. A similar pattern is observed in deaths, which exceed or approach the peak seen in the first wave. In the first wave, all capitals and northeastern states adopted intense isolation measures. Fortaleza, Recife and Teresina reached the highest isolation index of all capitals, close to 0.60. This index decreases, with a slight growth trend until the end of December. With the exception of Fortaleza and Salvador, the other capitals fell to less than 0.40. CONCLUSION The Brazilian NE and the country are in increasingly complicated health, social and economic situations. It is necessary to speed up vaccinations and maintain non-pharmacological measures: face masks, social distancing measures and hygiene care, in addition to policies to protect workers who have lost their incomes and to subsidize small business owners.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Analisar a epidemia da covid-19 na região Nordeste do Brasil, uma das mais atingidas por essa virose. MÉTODOS Os dados oficiais para covid-19 dos estados do Nordeste são referentes ao período de março de 2020 a março de 2021. A análise para capitais e estados da série do acumulado semanal de casos e de óbitos confirmados foi feita com emprego do aplicativo JoinPoint Trend Analysis. RESULTADOS Em um ano, o Nordeste acumulou 22,9% dos casos e 21,5% dos óbitos do país pela covid-19. No início da pandemia, todos os estados apresentaram um crescimento sustentável de casos, primeiro nas capitais e depois interior. Em seguida, observam-se decréscimos em todos os estados e suas capitais, porém muitos permanecem com números elevados. Em meados do segundo semestre de 2020, o número de casos começa a crescer nos estados e suas capitais, alguns em velocidade explosiva, em especial no final de 2020 e início de 2021. Padrão similar é observado para os óbitos, os quais ultrapassaram ou aproximam-se do teto observado na primeira onda, na qual todas as capitais e estados do Nordeste adotaram intensas medidas de isolamento. Fortaleza, Recife e Teresina atingiram os maiores índices de isolamento de todas as capitais, perto de 0,60. Esse índice decresce, com tendência leve de crescimento até final de dezembro, voltando a decrescer. Com exceção de Fortaleza e Salvador, as demais capitais caíram para menos de 0,40. CONCLUSÃO O Nordeste brasileiro e o país estão em uma situação sanitária, social e econômica cada vez mais complexa. É necessário acelerar o processo de vacinação e manter as medidas não farmacológicas - constante uso de máscaras faciais, medidas de distanciamento e cuidados de higiene -, além de políticas de proteção aos trabalhadores que perderam as suas rendas e subsídios aos pequenos empresários.


Assuntos
Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19 , Brasil/epidemiologia , Cidades , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 54: 113, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | SES-SP, BBO - odontologia (Brasil), LILACS | ID: biblio-1139471

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of early determinants on adolescent fat-free mass. METHODS: A cohort study with 579 adolescents evaluated at birth and adolescence in a birth cohort in São Luís, Maranhão. In the proposed model, estimated by structural equation modeling, socioeconomic status (SES) at birth, maternal age, pregestational body mass index (BMI), gestational smoking, gestational weight gain, type of delivery, gestational age, sex of the newborn, length and weight at birth, adolescent socioeconomic status, "neither study/nor work" generation, adolescent physical activity level and alcohol consumption were tested as early determinants of adolescent fat-free mass (FFM). RESULTS: A higher pregestational BMI resulted in higher FFM in adolescence (Standardized Coefficient, SC = 0.152; p < 0.001). Being female implied a lower FFM in adolescence (SC = −0.633; p < 0.001). The negative effect of gender on FFM was direct (SC = −0.523; p < 0.001), but there was an indirect negative effect via physical activity level (SC = −0.085; p < 0.001). Women were less active (p < 0.001). An increase of 0.5 kg (1 Standard Deviation, SD) in birth weight led to a gain of 0.25 kg/m2 (0.106 SD) in adolescent FFM index (p = 0.034). Not studying or working had a negative effect on the adolescent's FFM (SC = −0.106; p = 0.015). Elevation of 1 SD in the adolescent's physical activity level represented an increase of 0.5 kg/m2 (0.207 SD) in FFM index (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The early determinants with the greatest effects on adolescent FFM are gender, adolescent physical activity level, pregestational BMI, birth weight and belonging to the "neither-nor" generation.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Adolescente , Peso ao Nascer , Composição Corporal , Desenvolvimento do Adolescente/fisiologia , Gordura Subcutânea/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Adiposidade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Brasil , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos de Coortes , Idade Gestacional , Desenvolvimento Muscular , Saúde do Adolescente , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Análise de Classes Latentes
8.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 54: 98, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês, Português | SES-SP, BBO - odontologia (Brasil), LILACS | ID: biblio-1139459

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of being a beneficiary of the Bolsa Família Program (BFP) in the vaccination of children aged 13 to 35 months. METHODS: Our study was based on all birth records of residents of Ribeirão Preto (SP) and probabilistic sampling with 1/3 of the births of residents of São Luís (MA), selecting low-income children, born in 2010, belonging to the cohorts Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís Birth Cohort Studies and eligible for the Bolsa Família program. The information of Cadastro Único (CadÚnico - Single Registry) was used to categorize the receipt of benefit from the BFP (yes or no). The final sample consisted of 532 children in Ribeirão Preto and 1,229 in São Luís. The outcome variable was a childhood vaccine regimen, constructed with BCG, tetravalent, triple viral, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis, rotavirus and yellow fever vaccines. The adjustment variables were: economic class, mother's schooling and mother's skin color. Children with monthly per capita family income of up to R$ 280.00 and/or economic class D/E were considered eligible for the benefit of the BFP. A theoretical model was constructed using a directed acyclic graph to estimate the effect of being a beneficiary of the BFP in the vaccination of low-income children. In the statistical analyses, weighing was used by the inverse of the probability of exposure and pairing by propensity score. RESULTS: Considering a monthly per capita family income of up to R$ 280.00, being a beneficiary of the BFP had no effect on the childhood vaccination schedule, according to weighing by the inverse of the probability of exposure (SL-coefficient: −0.01; 95%CI −0.07 to 0.04; p = 0.725 and RP-coefficient: 0.04; 95%CI −0.02 to 0.10; p = 0.244) and pairing by propensity score (SL-coefficient: −0.01; 95%CI −0.07 to 0.05; p = 0.744 and RP-coefficient: 0.04; 95%CI −0.02 to 0.10; p = 0.231). CONCLUSIONS: The receipt of the benefit of the BFP did not influence childhood vaccination, which is one of the conditionalities of the program. This may indicate that this conditionality is not being adequately monitored.


RESUMEN OBJETIVO: Estimar o efeito de ser beneficiário do Programa Bolsa Família (PBF) na vacinação de crianças de 13 a 35 meses. MÉTODOS: Partiu-se de todos os registros de nascimentos de residentes de Ribeirão Preto (SP) e de amostragem probabilística com ⅓ dos nascimentos de residentes de São Luís (MA), selecionando-se crianças de baixa renda, nascidas em 2010, pertencentes às coortes Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís Birth Cohort Studies e elegíveis ao PBF. As informações do Cadastro Único (CadÚnico) foram utilizadas para categorizar o recebimento de benefício do PBF (sim ou não). A amostra final foi de 532 crianças em Ribeirão Preto e 1.229 em São Luís. A variável-desfecho foi esquema vacinal infantil, construída com as vacinas BCG, tetravalente, tríplice viral, hepatite B, poliomielite, rotavírus e febre amarela. As variáveis de ajuste foram: classe econômica, escolaridade da mãe e cor de pele da mãe. Consideraram-se elegíveis ao benefício do PBF crianças com renda familiar per capita mensal de até R$ 280,00 e/ou da classe econômica D/E. Para estimar o efeito de ser beneficiário do PBF na vacinação de crianças de baixa renda, construiu-se um modelo teórico por meio de gráfico acíclico direcionado. Nas análises estatísticas, foi usada ponderação pelo inverso da probabilidade de exposição e pareamento por escore de propensão. RESULTADOS: Considerando renda familiar per capita mensal de até R$ 280,00, ser beneficiário do PBF não teve efeito no esquema vacinal infantil, segundo ponderação pelo inverso da probabilidade de exposição (SL-coeficiente: −0,01; IC95% −0,07 a 0,04; p = 0,725 e RP-coeficiente: 0,04; IC95% −0,02 a 0,10; p = 0,244) e pareamento pelo escore de propensão (SL-coeficiente: −0,01; IC95% −0,07 a 0,05; p = 0,744 e RP-coeficiente: 0,04; IC95% −0,02 a 0,10; p = 0,231). CONCLUSÕES: O recebimento do benefício do PBF não exerceu influência sobre a vacinação infantil, que é uma das condicionalidades do programa. Isso pode indicar que essa condicionalidade não está sendo adequadamente acompanhada.


Assuntos
Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Pública , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Brasil , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos de Coortes , Esquemas de Imunização , Programas Governamentais
9.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 54: 131, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - odontologia (Brasil), SES-SP | ID: biblio-1145072

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the state of Maranhão, Brazil. METHODS: A population-based household survey was performed, from July 27, 2020 to August 8, 2020. The estimates considered clustering, stratification and non-response. Qualitative detection of IgM and IgG antibodies was performed in a fully-automated Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on the Cobas® e601 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics). RESULTS: In total, 3,156 individuals were interviewed. Seroprevalence of total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was 40.4% (95%CI 35.6-45.3). Population adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions was higher at the beginning of the pandemic than in the last month. SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were significantly lower among mask wearers and among those who maintained social and physical distancing in the last month compared to their counterparts. Among the infected, 26.0% were asymptomatic. The infection fatality rate (IFR) was 0.14%, higher for men and older adults. The IFR based on excess deaths was 0.28%. The ratio of estimated infections to reported cases was 22.2. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 estimated in this population-based survey is one of the highest reported. The local herd immunity threshold may have been reached or might be reached soon.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Imunidade Coletiva , COVID-19/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Brasil/epidemiologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
10.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 33: e094, 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1039298

RESUMO

Abstract This study aimed to analyze the association of sociodemographic, child health, healthcare service, and access indicators with developmental defects of enamel (DDE) acquired outside the uterus, based on gestational factors. A cohort of births was carried out, and 982 children aged 12 to 30 months were examined. A total of 1,500 women were followed up as of the 5th month of gestation, and the child's gestational age was evaluated at follow-up. The clinical examination was performed as recommended by the World Health Organization, and defects were classified using the modified DDE index. Six models were considered: presence of DDE (Model 1) or opacities (Model 4), number of teeth with DDE (Model 2) or opacities (Model 5), and incidence rate of DDE (Model 3) or opacities (Model 6). Associations were estimated by relative risk (RR) in Poisson regression models. In the adjusted analysis, the mother's lowest education level was associated with the highest occurrence of DDE in Models 1 (RR = 26.43; p = 0.002), 2 (RR = 9.70; p = 0.009), and 3 (RR = 5.63; p = 0.047). Breastfeeding for over 12 months (RR = 0.45; p = 0.030) and recent use of anti-infection drugs (RR = 0.20; p = 0.039) had a protective effect on DDE (Model 1). The factors associated with the highest incidence of opacities were not having health insurance (RR = 2.00; p = 0.043) (Model 5), and belonging to a family of poor social class (RR = 4.67; p = 0.007) (Model 6). Children in a situation of socioeconomic vulnerability have a higher risk of presenting extrauterine DDE. Breastfeeding was a protection factor for DDE development.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Esmalte Dentário/anormalidades , Hipoplasia do Esmalte Dentário/etiologia , Hipoplasia do Esmalte Dentário/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Brasil/epidemiologia , Aleitamento Materno , Incidência , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Idade Gestacional , Medição de Risco , Hipoplasia do Esmalte Dentário/prevenção & controle , Populações Vulneráveis , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Teóricos
11.
Cien Saude Colet ; 19(2): 629-40, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24863839

RESUMO

The scope of this study was to evaluate the use of oral health services (OHS) and related factors in municipalities with more than 100,000 inhabitants in Maranhão, Brazil. It was a population-based sample including 1214 children and 1059 adults. Prevalence ratios (PR) were estimated by hierarchical Poisson regression in accordance with Andersen's theoretical model. Over 91% of children and 71.9% of adults had not used the OHS in the six months prior to the interview. Of those who did, 48.5% were attended in the Unified Health System (SUS). Preventive were more frequent than curative procedures. In children and adults, predisposing, facilitating and need-based factors explained the use of OHS. Children aged >2 years (PR=5.29), with greater schooling of the head of the household (PR=2.37), e"6 prenatal visits (PR=1.69) and dental treatment needs (PR=9.54) were associated with greater use of the OHS. In adults, use was associated with greater schooling (PR=2.26), economic class A/B (PR=1.38), self-perceived health as good/very good (PR=1.72) and need for treatment (PR=18.25). The use of the OHS is neither universal nor equitable and there are deficiencies in comprehensive care, as few people use the more complex services. Fewer prenatal visits appear to be a predictor of non-use of the OHS by children.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Bucal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
12.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 40(6): 542-9, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22725605

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate the association between prolonged breastfeeding and early childhood caries(ECC) with adjustment for important confounders, using hieraschical approach. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved 260 low-income children (18-42 months). The number of decayed teeth was used as a measure of caries. Following a theoretical framework, the hierarchical model was built in a forward fashion, by adding the following levels in succession: level 1: age; level 2: social variables; level 3: health variables; level 4: behavioral variables; level 5: oral hygiene-related variables; level 6: oral hygiene quality measured by visible plaque; and level 7: contamination by mutans streptococci. Sequential forward multiple Poisson regression analysis was employed. RESULTS: Breast-feeding was not a risk factor for ECC after adjustment for some confounders (incidence density ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.59, P = 0.363). CONCLUSION: Prolonged breast-feeding was not a risk factor for ECC while age, high sucrose comption between main meals and the quality of oral higiene were associated with disease in children.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Cárie Dentária/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Higiene Bucal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
13.
Ciênc. Saúde Colet. (Impr.) ; 19(2): 629-640, fev. 2014. tab, graf
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-705397

RESUMO

Objetivou-se avaliar a utilização dos serviços de saúde bucal (SSB) e fatores associados nos municípios com mais de 100 mil habitantes do Maranhão. A amostra de base populacional incluiu 1214 crianças e 1059 adultos. Estimaram-se razões de prevalência (RP) por regressão de Poisson hierarquizada, segundo modelo teórico de Andersen. Mais de 91% das crianças e 71,9% dos adultos não utilizaram os SSB nos seis meses anteriores à entrevista. Dos que utilizaram 48,5% foram atendidos no SUS. Procedimentos preventivos foram mais frequentes que os curativos. Em crianças e adultos fatores predisponentes, facilitadores e de necessidade explicaram o uso de SSB. Em crianças, idade > 2 anos (RP = 5,29), maior escolaridade do chefe da família (RP = 2,37), > 6 consultas pré-natais (RP = 1,69) e necessidade de tratamento dentário (RP = 9,54) associaram-se ao maior uso dos SSB. Nos adultos, maior uso associou-se à maior escolaridade (RP = 2,26), classe econômica A/B (RP = 1,38), autopercepção da saúde boa/muito boa (RP = 1,72) e necessidade de tratamento (RP = 18,25). A utilização dos SSB não é universal, nem equânime e há deficiência na atenção integral, pois serviços de maior complexidade são utilizados por poucos. Menor número de consultas pré-natais parece ser preditor da não utilização dos SSB por crianças.


The scope of this study was to evaluate the use of oral health services (OHS) and related factors in municipalities with more than 100,000 inhabitants in Maranhão, Brazil. It was a population-based sample including 1214 children and 1059 adults. Prevalence ratios (PR) were estimated by hierarchical Poisson regression in accordance with Andersen's theoretical model. Over 91% of children and 71.9% of adults had not used the OHS in the six months prior to the interview. Of those who did, 48.5% were attended in the Unified Health System (SUS). Preventive were more frequent than curative procedures. In children and adults, predisposing, facilitating and need-based factors explained the use of OHS. Children aged >2 years (PR=5.29), with greater schooling of the head of the household (PR=2.37), e"6 prenatal visits (PR=1.69) and dental treatment needs (PR=9.54) were associated with greater use of the OHS. In adults, use was associated with greater schooling (PR=2.26), economic class A/B (PR=1.38), self-perceived health as good/very good (PR=1.72) and need for treatment (PR=18.25). The use of the OHS is neither universal nor equitable and there are deficiencies in comprehensive care, as few people use the more complex services. Fewer prenatal visits appear to be a predictor of non-use of the OHS by children.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Serviços de Saúde Bucal , Brasil , Estudos Transversais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA