The cost-effectiveness of screening for oral cancer in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: To use a decision-analytic model to determine the incremental costs and outcomes of alternative oral cancer screening programmes conducted in a primary care environment. DESIGN: The cost-effectiveness of oral cancer screening programmes in a number of primary care environments was simulated using a decision analysis model. Primary data on actual resource use and costs were collected by case note review in two hospitals. Additional data needed to inform the model were obtained from published costs, from systematic reviews and by expert opinion using the Trial Roulette approach. The value of future research was determined using expected value of perfect information (EVPI) for the decision to screen and for each of the model inputs. SETTING: Hypothetical screening programmes conducted in a number of primary care settings. Eight strategies were compared: (A) no screen; (B) invitational screen--general medical practice; (C) invitational screen--general dental practice; (D) opportunistic screen--general medical practice; (E) opportunistic screen--general dental practice; (F) opportunistic high-risk screen--general medical practice; (G) opportunistic high-risk screen--general dental practice; and (H) invitational screen--specialist. PARTICIPANTS: A hypothetical population over the age of 40 years was studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main measures were mean lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of each alternative screening scenario and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to determine the additional costs and benefits of each strategy over another. RESULTS: No screening (strategy A) was always the cheapest option. Strategies B, C, E and H were never cost-effective and were ruled out by dominance or extended dominance. Of the remaining strategies, the ICER for the whole population (age 49-79 years) ranged from pound 15,790 to pound 25,961 per QALY. Modelling a 20% reduction in disease progression always gave the lowest ICERs. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that there is considerable uncertainty in the optimal decision identified by the ICER, depending on both the maximum amount that the NHS may be prepared to pay and the impact that treatment has on the annual malignancy transformation rate. Overall, however, high-risk opportunistic screening by a general dental or medical practitioner (strategies F and G) may be cost-effective. EVPIs were high for all parameters with population values ranging from pound 8 million to pound 462 million. However, the values were significantly higher in males than females but also varied depending on malignant transformation rate, effects of treatment and willingness to pay. Partial EVPIs showed the highest values for malignant transformation rate, disease progression, self-referral and costs of cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic high-risk screening, particularly in general dental practice, may be cost-effective. This screening may more effectively be targeted to younger age groups, particularly 40-60 year olds. However, there is considerable uncertainty in the parameters used in the model, particularly malignant transformation rate, disease progression, patterns of self-referral and costs. Further study is needed on malignant transformation rates of oral potentially malignant lesions and to determine the outcome of treatment of oral potentially malignant lesions. Evidence has been published to suggest that intervention has no greater benefit than 'watch and wait'. Hence a properly planned randomised controlled trial may be justified. Research is also needed into the rates of progression of oral cancer and on referral pathways from primary to secondary care and their effects on delay and stage of presentation.

A longitudinal study of peridontal status comparing osseous recontouring with flap curettage. I. Results after 6 months.

The purpose this study was to test for short-term clinical differences in periodontal status after treatment with osseous recontouring and flap curettage in humans. Twelve systemically healthy patients with bilaterally similar marginal periodontal destruction received a standardized regime of presurgical therapy. The posterior segments of these patients were then treated with osseous recontouring and flap curettage. The investigators assigned the segments in one jaw at random to osseous recontouring and flap curettage, and then reversed the sides receiving surgical treatment in the opposing jaw. Postsurgical photographs and measurements for supragingival plaque, tooth mobility, gingival inflammation and periodontal attachment levels relative to the cemento-enamel junction were made for 6 months. Statistical analysis revealed that: (1) osseous recontouring and open flap curettage equally reduced plaque and gingival inflammation; (2) each surgical procedure equally increased attached gingiva; (3) pocket reduction achieved with osseous recontouring was maintained over 6 months, pockets recurring after open curettage; (4) open curettage did not induce bone regeneration; (5) osseous recontouring did not result in irreversible tooth mobility; (6) osseous recontouring resulted in a net loss of attachment; open curettage producing a net gain, especially in deeper pockets; and (7) both procedures improved periodontal health.

The image of plastic surgeons in news media coverage of the silicone breast implant controversy.

We analyzed the portrayal of plastic surgeons in the media by using the qualitative method of narrative analysis of newspaper articles available between July 1991 and June 1992 and popular magazine articles available from 1965 through 1992 in the Tampa Bay area. Plastic surgeons were presented as antagonists in the "horror stories" of sick women, as combatants in a medical community divided in its assessment of health risks, and as profit-oriented businesspersons. Patients were fully developed heroines, whereas plastic surgeons were described negatively by their antagonists, which undermines the expertise, good character, and good will that determine credibility for plastic surgeons. Providing the press with stories about their own efforts to help patients might have helped plastic surgeons receive more favorable press and enhance their credibility. More sophisticated handling of underlying values and the problem of communicating safety also might have been helpful.

Correction of periodontal abnormalities as a preliminary phase of oral rehabilitation.

The elimination of etiological factors and the correction of periodontal abnormalities are often a necessary preliminary phase of oral reconstruction. The development of optimal gingival and bony qualities using the surgical procedures outlined when indicated improves the prognosis of prospective abutment teeth and additionally may improve esthetics, retention, and maintenance of a fixed restoration.

Synthetic absorbable and nonabsorbable microsutures: a histological comparison.

The increasing usage of microsurgery in gynaecology and the recent release of a synthetic absorbable microsuture prompted a comparative study between this material and a nonabsorbable microsuture. Ethilon and Coated Vicryl sutures (Ethicon Inc.) were inserted into rabbit uteri and the histological response compared at 35 and 70 days using both light and polarizing microscopy. The results indicated that although the predominating cell types differed, the overall histological sequelae were markedly less with the synthetic absorbable suture than with the nonabsorbable suture materials.