Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart ; 103(2): 111-116, 2017 01 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27511446

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term follow-up of the unrestricted use of a biodegradable polymer-coated drug-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: The Nobori 2 study was a prospective, multicentre, observational registry evaluating the safety and the efficacy of the biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent (BP-BES) among 3067 patients recruited at 125 international sites. The primary combined endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target-lesion revascularisation (TLR). RESULTS: Five-year follow-up was available in 2738 (89.3%) patients. The combined endpoint occurred in 268 patients (10%, 95% CIs 8.9% to 11.3%) at 5 years, with 3.9% of events during the first year and 6.2% during years 1-5 of follow-up. Cumulative rates of TLR and definite/probable stent thrombosis were 5.3% (95% CI 4.5% to 6.3%) and 1.1% (95% CI 0.8% to 1.6%), respectively. Between 1 and 5 years, TLR and very late stent thrombosis rates were 3.5% (95% CI 2.8% to 4.4%) and 0.6% (95% CI 0.3% to 1.1%), respectively. Previous PCI (HR, 2.05, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.50), moderate-to-severe renal disease (HR, 1.89, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.74) and peripheral vascular disease (HR, 1.86, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.52) were the three most powerful independent predictors of the combined endpoint at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The final 5-year follow-up of the Nobori 2 registry demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of the BP-BES in an unselected, broadly inclusive cohort of PCI patients, highlighting the excellent performance of this coronary stent technology after polymer biodegradation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN81649913; Results.


Assuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis , Stents Farmacológicos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Sirolimo/análogos & derivados , Implantes Absorvíveis/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Trombose Coronária/epidemiologia , Trombose Coronária/etiologia , Stents Farmacológicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Nefropatias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/epidemiologia , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/etiologia , Polímeros , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Sistema de Registros , Retratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
EuroIntervention ; 8(1): 109-16, 2012 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22278136

RESUMO

AIMS: Previous studies for approved indications (on-label) have shown the good safety and efficacy profiles of the Nobori DES. We conducted a prospective, multicentre study to validate the clinical performance of this stent in a real-world setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3,067 consecutive patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention with the Nobori DES were enrolled in the NOBORI 2 registry. At one and two years, 97% and 95% of patients, respectively, were available for follow-up. The rates of target lesion failure (TLF), cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularisations were: 3.9%, 1.2%, 1.9% and 2.2% at one year and 5.1%, 1.6%, 2.4% and 3.0% at two years. Overall, 2,242 patients (73%) were treated for at least one off-label indication. When comparing off-label and on-label groups, the results were: TLF 4.5% vs. 2.2%, p=0.003 at one year and 5.9% vs. 2.8%, p=0.001 at two years. The rate of stent thrombosis was 0.68%, and 0.80% at one and two years, respectively with no difference between the off-label and on-label groups (0.76% vs. 0.48%, p=0.6 and 0.89% vs. 0.61%, p=0.5). CONCLUSIONS: The promising results previously observed in lower risk patients can be replicated in daily practice. As expected, in off-label indications, rates of adverse events were higher. Nevertheless, our results suggest the good and sustained performance of this stent system in high-risk patients with significant comorbidities and/or complex lesions.


Assuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Stents Farmacológicos , Polímeros , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Ásia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Rotulagem de Produtos , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Sistema de Registros , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Sirolimo/análogos & derivados , Trombose/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA