Safety and Efficacy of All Comers Treated with a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon for Below Knee Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Data on paclitaxel coated balloons (PCBs) for below knee (BTK) angioplasty exhibited conflicting efficacy results, and previous meta-analyses suggested an increased mortality and amputation risk highlighting the need for further research. The aim of this study was to investigate safety and efficacy of PCBs for BTK interventions in a real world cohort. METHODS: Within a single centre cohort study, 552 consecutive patients were included undergoing BTK interventions with and without PCB use. Two year safety and efficacy results were compared in unadjusted and propensity score matched (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: BTK interventions were performed in 157 patients with PCB angioplasty (100% Lutonix 0.014 inch drug coated balloon; Bard Lutonix, New Hope, MN, USA) and 395 patients with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). The majority of interventions (> 70%) were performed for chronic limb threatening ischaemia. Mean lesion length was 20.8 ± 12.6 cm; 61.2% in the PCB and 66.7% in the POBA group were occlusions. In the PCB group, more procedures were performed for re-stenotic lesions than POBA (28.5 vs. 17.2%). In PSM analysis (128 matched pairs), the primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD TLR), which occurred in 70.1% in the PCB and 73.1% in the POBA group at one year (p = .85; McNemar test). Survival analysis suggested lower rates of major amputations in the PCB group in unadjusted (94.4% ± 2.1 vs. 89.2% ± 1.9 in the POBA group) and PSM analyses (97.2% ± 1.6 vs. 89.3% ± 3.5) through two years, while no differences were seen for CD TLR and all cause mortality between the groups. CONCLUSION: In this all comer analysis, PCBs were found to be safe for BTK interventions with a signal towards lower amputation rates but no benefit was seen for repeat revascularisation.

COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions.

AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 µg/mm2. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, clinical trial 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either high- or low-dose DCB after stratification for lesion length. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints comprised primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (i.e. device and procedure-related deaths through 1 month, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of -10% at 12 months. Total occlusions were observed frequently (>40%) and provisional stenting was performed in every fourth intervention. Non-inferiority was determined for both primary efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months. Primary patency was 81.5% in the high-dose and 83.0% in low-dose DCB group {difference: 1.5% [lower bound of the 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) -5.2%]; Pnon-inferiority < 0.01}. Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 92.6% in high-dose and in 91.0% in low-dose DCB group [difference -1.6% (lower bound of the 90% two-sided CI -6.5%); Pnon-inferiority < 0.01]. Overall death rate was low (2.0%) and no major amputation occurred. CONCLUSION: Two DCBs with different coating characteristics exhibited comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02701543).

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Atherosclerosis Patients With Popliteal Artery Involvement.

PURPOSE: To investigate outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty in endovascular interventions including or restricted to the popliteal artery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 266 patients [median age 72 years, interquartile range (IQR) 62, 78; 166 men] treated with DCB angioplasty in 281 de novo lesions including the popliteal artery between December 2011 and January 2015 at a single center. The median lesion length was 270 mm (IQR 150, 373). The study outcomes were primary patency and predictors of restenosis [reported as the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)]. RESULTS: The primary patency was 77.4% at a median 12.2 months (IQR 5.7, 18.8). Independent variables associated with restenosis included baseline Rutherford category (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77, p=0.02), reference vessel diameter (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.95, p=0.02), dissection (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.022.79, p=0.04), and standard nitinol stent use (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.79, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Outcomes after DCB angioplasty in lesions including the popliteal artery were acceptable compared with previous studies. Further investigation with long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results.

Evaluation of the Biodegradable Igaki-Tamai Scaffold After Drug-Eluting Balloon Treatment of De Novo Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions: The GAIA-DEB Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Igaki-Tamai biodegradable scaffold after drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty in patients with occlusive superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, nonrandomized study enrolled 20 patients (mean age 66.7±11.6 years; 14 men) with symptomatic de novo SFA lesions undergoing angioplasty with the In.Pact Admiral paclitaxel-coated balloon and subsequent implantation of the Igaki-Tamai bioresorbable scaffold. All patients were claudicants. The average diameter stenosis was 89.7%, and the mean length was 43.6 mm. Clinical examinations with duplex sonography were performed after 1, 6, 9, and 12 months. The main study outcomes were technical success, restenosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), ankle-brachial index (ABI) improvement, and changes in quality of life evaluated with the walking impairment questionnaire. Safety was assessed by monitoring the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: Angioplasty with a paclitaxel-coated balloon was performed in all patients, resulting in an average diameter stenosis of 24%. Subsequent implantation of the Igaki-Tamai scaffold reduced the average diameter stenosis to 3.5%. In the first 6 months, 2 cases of restenosis were reported, with no TLRs within that period. However, by the 12-month follow-up in 19 patients, 11 patients had lost in-stent patency. Among these patients, 8 had TLRs, which were the only adverse events recorded that were referable to the procedure. Quality-of-life assessments showed improvement in the majority of patients. CONCLUSION: The GAIA-DEB study shows that DEB treatment of the femoral artery prior to the implantation of the biodegradable Igaki-Tamai scaffold is safe. However, the antiproliferative actions of paclitaxel in the vessel wall were not effective in preventing restenosis. In-stent restenosis occurred predominantly after 6 months.

Midterm Patency After Femoropopliteal Interventions: A Comparison of Standard and Interwoven Nitinol Stents and Drug-Coated Balloons in a Single-Center, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: To describe and compare primary patency rates in patients undergoing endovascular femoropopliteal interventions with standard or interwoven nitinol stents or drug-coated balloons. METHODS: A cohort of 1292 patients was treated for symptomatic femoropopliteal occlusive disease classified as Rutherford category ≥ 1 at a large vascular center between June 2006 and August 2013 using either standard nitinol stents (SNS; n=432), interwoven nitinol stents (INS; n=470), or drug-coated balloons (DCB; n=390). Primary patency rates were assessed by ultrasound or angiographic readings for over 3 years of follow-up. Propensity score-matched pairs were formed to compare each treatment with another using survival analysis. RESULTS: Survival curves of primary patency favored INS compared with SNS in 368 propensity score-matched pairs (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 86.6%, 76.4%, and 68.9%, respectively, in the INS group vs 60.5%, 46.1%, and 42.1%, respectively, in the SNS group. No significant difference (p=0.232) was seen for the comparison of SNS vs DCB in 284 matched pairs over long-term follow-up (primary patency estimates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 79.8%, 53.8%, and 32.9%, respectively, in the DCB group vs 60.5%, 44.8%, and 40.3%, respectively, in the SNS group). Survival curves of primary patency favored INS over DCB in 254 matched pairs (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 79.0%, 51.2%, and 30.1%, respectively, in the DCB group vs 89.0%, 76.9%, and 66.2%, respectively, in the INS group. CONCLUSION: Propensity score-based analysis of primary patency suggests profound differences in restenosis rates between various treatment modalities for femoropopliteal disease for over 3 years of follow-up.

Single-Center Experience With Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloons in Infrapopliteal Arteries.

PURPOSE: To examine patient outcomes following the use of the Lutonix drug-coated balloon (DCB) in patients undergoing endovascular intervention in below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 248 patients who were treated for symptomatic peripheral artery disease with the Lutonix DCB between May 2013 and October 2014. Forty patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 208 patients (mean age 74.1±9.7 years; 138 men) with evaluable data for outcome analysis. The patient cohort suffered from either severe claudication (38.6%) or critical limb ischemia (CLI; 61.4%) in 220 limbs. Almost two-thirds (140, 63.6%) of the 220 target lesions were total occlusions, and 37 (17.8%) of all patients had occlusion of all 3 BTK vessels before intervention. RESULTS: Over a median 9-month follow-up, target lesion revascularization occurred in 15.9% of patients with an average time to first reintervention of 8 months. In total, 39 amputations were performed in 31 limbs. However, 17 of these amputations were preplanned minor amputations below the ankle; only 9 (4.1%) major amputations occurred corresponding to 6.6% of the CLI cohort. Freedom from the composite of death or major amputation was estimated as 92% and 85% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, by Kaplan-Meier analysis. In the full cohort, improvement of at least 1 Rutherford category was seen in 130 (59.1%) limbs after 1 year or at the last follow-up, with 104 (80.0%) of those limbs showing an improvement of ≥2 categories. CONCLUSION: From this single-center experience, the Lutonix DCB shows therapeutic promise in a disease state where new treatment options are needed.

German Center Subanalysis of the LEVANT 2 Global Randomized Study of the Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.

PURPOSE: To report a subanalysis of the German centers enrolling patients in the prospective, global, multicenter, randomized LEVANT 2 pivotal trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01412541) of the Lutonix drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. METHODS: Among the 476 patients in LEVANT 2, 126 patients (mean age 67.1±9.6 years; 79 men) were enrolled at the 8 participating German sites between August 2011 and July 2012 and were randomized 2:1 to treatment with the Lutonix DCB (n=83) vs an uncoated balloon during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA, n=43). All patients had intermittent claudication or rest pain (Rutherford categories 2-4). Average lesion length was 58 mm and average treated length was 100 mm. Severe calcification was present in 11% of lesions, and 23% were total occlusions. The efficacy outcome was primary patency at 12 months, and the safety outcome was 12-month freedom from a composite of perioperative death, index limb-related death, amputation (below or above the ankle), and index limb revascularization. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse events, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and lesion characteristics were matched between Lutonix DCB and PTA groups, as were the final percent diameter stenosis (19%) and procedure success (91%). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 12-month primary patency rate was 80% vs 58% (p=0.015) and the composite safety endpoint rate was 94% vs 72% (p=0.001), respectively. Freedom from TLR was higher for DCBs (96%) vs PTA (82%, p=0.012). Major adverse events were similar for both groups. The benefit favoring DCB over PTA was observed in German men and women. Compared to the non-German LEVANT 2 cohort, there was a shorter time between insertion and inflation of treatment balloons (21.8 vs 39.5 seconds, p<0.001) in the German cohort. Balloons were inflated to higher pressures (9.0 vs 7.7 atm, p<0.001) but for a shorter period of time (130 vs 167 seconds, p<0.001), and although treated lesions in the German cohort had a higher baseline stenosis, final postprocedure diameter stenosis was lower (19% vs 22%, p=0.04) than in the non-German patients. CONCLUSION: Superiority of DCB over PTA in the German cohort of LEVANT 2 was demonstrated for primary patency, composite safety, and freedom from TLR. The benefit of DCB was also consistent for both genders. Geographic or regional differences in procedural variables may account for the different outcomes between the German and non-German cohorts.

Molecular imaging of atherosclerotic lesions by positron emission tomography - can it meet the expectations?

Early non-invasive imaging of atherosclerosis and in particular the detection of lesions at risk with high specificity could significantly affect cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Conventional nuclear medicine approaches, in particular using autologous radiolabeled lipoproteins, can be related to histopathological findings; however, they fail to identify lesions at risk. Positron emission tomography (PET) tracers with much better physical properties have been examined, the most detailed information being available for F-18-deoxyglucose (FDG) and F-18-sodium fluoride (NaF). These two approaches are sensitive to different biochemical mechanisms, i.e. inflammation and microcalcification. Initial enthusiasm, in particular for F-18-FDG, has disappeared, although for F-18-NaF there is some hope, but this is not a breakthrough. No tracer is available so far that is able to identify a specific characteristic of a lesion prone to rupture. Other PET tracers in the pipeline have been examined, mainly in experimental models and only a few in patients, but they failed to contribute significantly to early lesion discovery and do not support great expectations. The key question is: Do we understand what we see? Moreover, methodological problems, a lack of standardization of imaging protocols and aspects of quantification provide a wide range for potential future improvements. While monitoring a therapeutic intervention seems to be possible for both F-18-FDG and F-18-NaF, highly specific early identification of lesions at risk by PET imaging is still far away. As of today, PET is not ready for routine clinical judgment of atherosclerotic lesions at risk to rupture. Even if all these problems can be solved, radiation exposure will still remain a concern, in particular for repeated studies.

Randomized Trial Comparing a Stent-Avoiding With a Stent-Preferred Strategy in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Limited comparative data exist on different interventional strategies for endovascular revascularization of complex femoropopliteal interventions. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors aimed to compare a stent-avoiding (SA) vs a stent-preferred (SP) strategy, promoting optimal lesion preparation and the use of drug-eluting technologies in both arms. METHODS: Within a prospective, multicenter, pilot study, 120 patients with symptomatic complex femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4, mean lesion length 187.7 ± 78.3 mm, 79.2% total occlusions) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to endovascular treatment with either paclitaxel-coated balloons or polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stents. Lesion preparation including the use of devices for plaque modification and/or removal was at the operators' discretion in both treatment arms. RESULTS: In the SA group, lesion preparation was more frequently performed (71.7% SA [43/60] vs 51.7% [31/60] SP; P = 0.038) with a high provisional stenting rate (48.3% [29/60]). At the 12-month follow-up, primary patency was 78.2% (43/55) in the SA group and 78.6% (44/56) in the SP group (P = 1.0; relative risk: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.818-1.210). Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 93.1% (54/58) in the SA group and in 94.9% (56/59) in the SP group (P = 0.717; relative risk: 0.981; 95% CI: 0.895-1.075), with all adverse events attributable to clinically driven target lesion revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Both endovascular strategies promoting lesion preparation before the use of drug-eluting devices suggest promising efficacy and safety results in complex femoropopliteal procedures with a high proportion of total occlusions through 12 months. Ongoing follow-up will show whether different results emerge over time. (Best Endovascular Strategy for Complex Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery [BEST-SFA]; NCT03776799).

Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial.

BACKGROUND: So far only 1-year data have been reported for direct comparisons of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) using different coating technologies. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the 24-month results on the efficacy and safety of low-dose vs high-dose PCBs with nominal paclitaxel densities of 2.0 and 3.5 µg/mm2 and different coating technologies for femoropopliteal interventions from the COMPARE (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease) trial. Procedural characteristics of clinically driven (CD) target lesion revascularization (TLR) were analyzed. METHODS: Within a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial, 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford categories 2-4, maximum lesion length 30 cm) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either a low-dose (Ranger) or a high-dose (IN.PACT) PCB after stratification for lesion length. Two-year follow-up included assessment of primary patency (defined as absence of CD TLR or binary restenosis with a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 by duplex ultrasound), safety, and functional and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency were 70.6% and 71.4% for the low-dose and high-dose PCBs (log-rank P = 0.96), respectively. One major amputation occurred in the high-dose group, and rates of all-cause mortality (3.6% vs 2.2%; P = 0.55) and CD TLR (17.3% vs 13.0%; P = 0.31) were similar between the groups. Among a total of 57 CD TLRs, 44.6% were performed for reocclusion and 28.1% for in-stent restenosis. Functional and clinical benefits over baseline were sustained in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year results of the COMPARE trial demonstrate a sustained treatment benefit of both low-dose and high-dose PCBs for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease; NCT02701543).

Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Drug-Coated Balloon Revascularization in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) for femoropopliteal interventions reported superior patency rates for both strategies compared to standard balloon angioplasty. To date, head-to-head comparisons are missing. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare DES versus DCB for femoropopliteal lesions through 36 months. METHODS: Within a multicenter, randomized trial, 150 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease were randomly assigned to primary DES implantation or DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting after stratification for lesion length (≤10 cm, >10 cm to ≤20 cm, and >20 cm to ≤30 cm). The primary effectiveness endpoint was primary patency at 12 months assessed by Kaplan-Meier. Secondary endpoints comprised major adverse events including death, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: More than one-half of lesions were total occlusions, and the stenting rate was 25.3% in the DCB group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency were 79% and 80% for DES and DCB at 12 months (p = 0.96) but decreased to 54% and 38% through 36 months (p = 0.17), respectively. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was >90% at 12 months but dropped to around 70% at 36 months in both groups. Overall, the mortality rate through 36 months was 7.3%, with 1 procedure-related death in the DCB group. Improvement of clinical outcomes was sustained through 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patency rates at 12 months suggest comparable effectiveness and safety of DES versus DCB plus bailout stenting in femoropopliteal interventions; a trend in favor of the DES was observed up to 36 months. (Randomized Evaluation of the Zilver PTX Stent vs. Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloons for Treatment of Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease of the Femoropopliteal Artery [REAL PTX]; NCT01728441).

12-Month Results From the First-in-Human Randomized Study of the Ranger Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the performance of the Ranger paclitaxel-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions at 12 months. BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are a promising endovascular treatment option for peripheral artery disease of the femoropopliteal segment, and each unique device requires dedicated clinical study. METHODS: The prospective, randomized RANGER SFA (Comparison of the Ranger™ Paclitaxel-Coated PTA Balloon Catheter and Uncoated PTA Balloons in Femoropopliteal Arteries) study (NCT02013193) enrolled 105 patients with symptomatic lower limb ischemia (Rutherford category 2 to 4) and stenotic lesions in the nonstented femoropopliteal segment at 10 European centers. Seventy-one patients (mean age 68 ± 8 years, n = 53 men) were enrolled in the Ranger DCB arm, and 34 patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years, n = 23 men) were assigned to the control group. Twelve-month analysis included patency, safety, and clinical outcomes and quality-of-life assessments. RESULTS: The DCB group had a greater primary patency rate at 12 months (Kaplan-Meier estimate 86.4% vs. 56.5%), with a significantly longer time to patency failure (log-rank p < 0.001). The estimated freedom from target lesion revascularization rate was 91.2% in the DCB group and 69.9% in the control group at 12 months, with a significantly longer time to reintervention (p = 0.010). No target limb amputations or device-related deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-month results show that patency was maintained longer after Ranger DCB treatment than after conventional balloon angioplasty, and this result was associated with a low revascularization rate and good clinical outcomes.

Drug-Coated Balloons for Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results of a Real-World Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate the efficacy of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) for treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions. BACKGROUND: Superiority of DCBs compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal interventions has been demonstrated in randomized trials for short lesions. Their performance in complex lesions with higher restenosis rates is unclear. METHODS: Patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, clinical improvement, and safety endpoints of femoropopliteal lesions in 288 limbs (n = 260) treated with the In.Pact Pacific or Admiral DCB (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) were retrospectively analyzed for up to 2 years of follow-up. Predictors of restenosis were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: Lesions were de novo in 51.7%, restenosis in 11.1%, and in-stent restenosis in 37.2%. Mean lesion length was 24.0 ± 10.2 cm, and 65.3% were occluded. Stent implantation was performed in 23.3%. Kaplan Meier estimates of primary patency were 79.2% and 53.7% for all lesions at 1 and 2 years, respectively, whereas freedom from TLR was 85.4% and 68.6%. Primary patency for in-stent restenosis treatment was 76.6% and 48.6%, and freedom from TLR was 83.0% and 58.7% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Rutherford category improved from a median 3.3 to 1.2 at 1 year, and to 1.1 at 2 years. Major amputation rate was 2.1% at 2 years. No adverse events were thought to be attributable to the coating of the balloon. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that DCB are safe and effective in delaying rather than preventing restenosis in long, complex lesions and restenosis of the femoropopliteal tract. Further studies are recommended to confirm these results.