Inhaled delivery of a lipid nanoparticle encapsulated messenger RNA encoding a ciliary protein for the treatment of primary ciliary dyskinesia.

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a respiratory disease caused by dysfunction of the cilia with currently no approved treatments. This predominantly autosomal recessive disease is caused by mutations in any one of over 50 genes involved in cilia function; DNAI1 is one of the more frequently mutated genes, accounting for approximately 5-10% of diagnosed PCD cases. A codon-optimized mRNA encoding DNAI1 and encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) was administered to mice via aerosolized inhalation resulting in the expression human DNAI1 in the multiciliated cells of the pseudostratified columnar epithelia. The spatial localization of DNAI1 expression in the bronchioles indicate that delivery of the DNAI1 mRNA transpires the lower airways. In a PCD disease model, exposure to the LNP-encapsulated DNAI1 mRNA resulted in increased ciliary beat frequency using high speed videomicroscopy showing the potential for an mRNA therapeutic to correct cilia function in patients with PCD due to DNAI1 mutations.

Sustained virologic response rates with telaprevir-based therapy in treatment-naive patients evaluated by race or ethnicity.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 studies of telaprevir (T) in combination with peginterferon α-2a and ribavirin (PR) in treatment-naive genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus-infected patients (ADVANCE/ILLUMINATE) were not designed a priori to assess the effect of race and ethnicity on treatment response. However, these factors are important given the lower sustained virologic response (SVR) rates observed in black and Hispanic/Latino patients treated with PR. GOALS: This retrospective pooled analysis evaluated the effect of race or ethnicity on treatment-naive patient response to telaprevir-based therapy and assessed resistant variant profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analysis comprised patients enrolled in ADVANCE (N=363) and ILLUMINATE (N=540) who received 12 weeks of telaprevir in combination with PR followed by 12 or 36 weeks of PR alone and patients in ADVANCE (N=361) who received 48 weeks of PR alone. Race and ethnicity were self-reported and not mutually exclusive. RESULTS: Higher SVR rates were observed with telaprevir-based therapy compared with PR in blacks [n=99 (62%) vs. n=28 (29%), respectively] and in Hispanics/Latinos [n=89 (72%) vs. n=38 (39%)]. The SVR was lower in telaprevir-treated blacks [n=99 (62%)] compared with nonblacks [n=791 (78%)] and in Hispanic/Latinos compared with non-Hispanics/Latinos [n=89 (72%) vs. n=801 (76%)]. Low discontinuation rates due to adverse events, including rash and anemia, were observed across subgroups. Resistance profiles were similar among the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-naive black and Hispanic/Latino patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection may benefit from telaprevir-based therapy, an important finding given the lower SVR rates observed in these patients when they are treated with PR alone.

Characterization of telaprevir treatment outcomes and resistance in patients with prior treatment failure: results from the REALIZE trial.

UNLABELLED: In the Phase 3 REALIZE study, 662 genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with prior peginterferon/ribavirin treatment failure (including relapsers, partial, and null responders) were randomized to 12 weeks of telaprevir given immediately (T12/PR48) or following 4 weeks of peginterferon/ribavirin (lead-in T12/PR48), or 12 weeks of placebo (PR48), combined with a total of 48 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 64% (T12/PR48), 66% (lead-in T12/PR48), and 17% (PR48). This analysis aimed to characterize treatment outcomes and viral variants emerging in telaprevir-treated patients not achieving SVR. HCV NS3·4A population sequencing was performed at baseline, during treatment, and follow-up. Telaprevir-resistant variants were classified into lower-level (3- to 25-fold 50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50) ] increase: V36A/M, T54A/S, R155I/K/M/T, and A156S) and higher-level (>25-fold IC(50) increase: V36M+R155K and A156T/V) resistance. Resistant variants were uncommon at baseline. Overall, 18% (52%, 19%, and 1% of prior null and partial responders and relapsers, respectively) of telaprevir-treated patients had on-treatment virologic failure, with no significant difference with or without a lead-in. Virologic failure during the telaprevir-treatment phase was predominantly associated with higher-level resistance; virologic failure during the peginterferon/ribavirin-treatment phase was associated with higher- or lower-level, or wildtype variants, depending on genotype. Relapse occurred in 9% of patients completing assigned treatment and was generally associated with lower-level resistant variants or wildtype. Resistant variants were no longer detectable by study end (median follow-up of 11 months) in 58% of non-SVR patients. CONCLUSION: In REALIZE, variants emerging in non-SVR, telaprevir-treated patients were similar irrespective of the use of a lead-in and were consistent with those previously reported. In most patients, resistant variants became undetectable over time.

Dynamic changes in HCV RNA levels and viral quasispecies in a patient with chronic hepatitis C after telaprevir-based treatment.

BACKGROUND: Telaprevir is a selective inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS3·4A serine protease. Treatment with telaprevir resulted in a rapid HCV-RNA decline in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients. OBJECTIVES: To report the clinical and viral course of a patient treated with telaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon-alpha-2a and ribavirin in a Phase 2 clinical trial (PROVE3). STUDY DESIGN: This previous non-responder to interferon based therapy was treated for 40 weeks with a telaprevir, pegylated interferon alpha-2a, and ribavirin regimen. Viral sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were performed before, during and after therapy. RESULTS: The patient, a 54 years old male patient, experienced a viral relapse 4 weeks post-treatment and HCV-RNA levels continued to increase 14 weeks post-treatment (150,000 IU/mL). The viral population, which was wild type at baseline, consisted of only V36A variants at both of these post-treatment timepoints. Subsequently, this patient had a transient disappearance of HCV-RNA for more than 1 year in the absence of antiviral therapy. Thereafter, HCV-RNA reappeared again with a viral population consisting of only wild type virus. Phylogenetic analysis of NS3·4A corresponded with a viral population bottleneck resulting in changes in viral quasispecies. CONCLUSION: In this case report, significant viral load reductions resulted in a genetic bottleneck leading to a reduction of variability in the hepatitis C viral population. We hypothesize that the reduction in viral heterogeneity potentially led to a reduced viral capacity to adapt to a host immune response leading to a transient loss of detectable HCV-RNA.

Hepatitis C viral evolution in genotype 1 treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients receiving telaprevir-based therapy in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: In patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection, telaprevir (TVR) in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin (PR) significantly increased sustained virologic response (SVR) rates compared with PR alone. However, genotypic changes could be observed in TVR-treated patients who did not achieve an SVR. METHODS: Population sequence analysis of the NS3•4A region was performed in patients who did not achieve SVR with TVR-based treatment. RESULTS: Resistant variants were observed after treatment with a telaprevir-based regimen in 12% of treatment-naïve patients (ADVANCE; T12PR arm), 6% of prior relapsers, 24% of prior partial responders, and 51% of prior null responder patients (REALIZE, T12PR48 arms). NS3 protease variants V36M, R155K, and V36M+R155K emerged frequently in patients with genotype 1a and V36A, T54A, and A156S/T in patients with genotype 1b. Lower-level resistance to telaprevir was conferred by V36A/M, T54A/S, R155K/T, and A156S variants; and higher-level resistance to telaprevir was conferred by A156T and V36M+R155K variants. Virologic failure during telaprevir treatment was more common in patients with genotype 1a and in prior PR nonresponder patients and was associated with higher-level telaprevir-resistant variants. Relapse was usually associated with wild-type or lower-level resistant variants. After treatment, viral populations were wild-type with a median time of 10 months for genotype 1a and 3 weeks for genotype 1b patients. CONCLUSIONS: A consistent, subtype-dependent resistance profile was observed in patients who did not achieve an SVR with telaprevir-based treatment. The primary role of TVR is to inhibit wild-type virus and variants with lower-levels of resistance to telaprevir. The complementary role of PR is to clear any remaining telaprevir-resistant variants, especially higher-level telaprevir-resistant variants. Resistant variants are detectable in most patients who fail to achieve SVR, but their levels decline over time after treatment.