Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 32(3): 369-375, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334667

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of a sirolimus drug-coated balloon (DCB) in the management of a thrombosed arteriovenous graft (AVG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center prospective pilot study was conducted between October 2018 and October 2019. Twenty patients (age = 67.0 years ± 10; male = 35%; mean time on dialysis = 31 months) with thrombosed upper limb AVG were enrolled. After successful pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and adequate treatment of the graft vein junction, sirolimus DCB angioplasty was performed at the graft vein junction. The patients were followed-up for 6 months, and all adverse events occurring during the study period were recorded. RESULTS: The primary circuit patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 76% and 65%, respectively, while the assisted-primary circuit patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 82% and 65%, respectively. The 3- and 6-month secondary circuit patency rates were 88% and 76%, respectively. Using Kaplan-Meier analyses, the estimated mean primary, assisted-primary, and secondary patencies were 285 days (95% confidence interval (CI) = 194-376 days), 319 days (95% CI = 221-416 days), and 409 days (95% CI = 333-485 days). No adverse event directly related to sirolimus DCB use was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that the application of sirolimus DCB at the graft vein junction after the successful thrombectomy of AVG may be a feasible option to improve patency outcomes.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Diálise Renal , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Trombose/terapia , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Idoso , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Trombectomia , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 70(3): 970-979.e3, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31445651

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulas for patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of stenosis. Despite conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA), restenosis rates are high. The use of a drug-coated balloon (DCB) may offer an alternative to reduce restenosis. METHODS: This study has been performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An electronic search on MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify articles evaluating DCB angioplasty for patients with HD access stenosis. Risk ratios (RRs) of primary patency were pooled, and relevant subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: There were 17 studies (8 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 9 cohort studies) included, comprising a total of 1113 stenotic dialysis accesses, of which 54.7% underwent DCB angioplasty and 45.3% underwent CBA. There was a significantly superior 6-month (RR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.74; P < .00001; I2 = 62%) and 12-month (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63-0.84; P < .0001; I2 = 53%) primary patency in the DCB angioplasty group in comparison to the CBA group (71.0% vs 49.2% at 6 months; 44.2% vs 20.6% at 12 months). Subgroup analyses of study design (RCTs, cohort studies) showed similar trends. Sensitivity analyses by excluding one poor-quality RCT and those employing the crossover analysis design also showed similar results. Studies investigating central venous stenosis showed significantly better 6-month (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41-0.79; P = .0009; I2 = 67%) and 12-month (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; P = .0004; I2 = 64%) primary patency in the DCB angioplasty group in comparison to the CBA group. The pooled rate of minor complications was low in both the DCB (1.1%) and CBA (0.9%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: DCB angioplasty appears to be a better and safe alternative to CBA in treating patients with HD stenosis in terms of 6- and 12-month primary patency. However, a larger trial is warranted to establish these findings.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Diálise Renal , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
3.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 24(12): 1290-1295, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30901497

RESUMO

AIM: Dysfunctional arteriovenous (AV) access remains a significant cause of morbidity and hospital admission for patients with end stage renal failure on haemodialysis. This study was performed to evaluate the impact of paclitaxel-coated Balloon (PCB) on the patency of AV access with recurrent stenoses. METHODS: We retrospectively studied haemodialysis patients who presented to our centre with recurrent AV access dysfunction and compared intervention-free patency using plain balloon versus PCB. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were followed up longitudinally. Intervention-free patency was better following PCB compared to previous intervention using plain balloons (6.4 ± 5.8 versus 4.0 ± 3.7, P < 0.01). The 3- and 6-month patency rates after PCB were significantly better compared to standard plain angioplasty balloon: 69.4% versus 52.4%, P < 0.01 and 42.9% versus 15.6%, P < 0.01 respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of circuit patency demonstrated the superiority of PCB over plain balloon angioplasty in both arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft (P < 0.01 and P = 0.01 respectively) although the patency of arteriovenous fistula remained significantly better than arteriovenous graft following interventions with PCB (P < 0.01). Age of AV access and the number of previous interventions were found to be significant predictors of patency following PCB intervention. CONCLUSION: Arteriovenous access intervention with PCB was shown to be superior compared to plain balloon in the treatment of both non-thrombosed and thrombosed AV accesses in our multi-ethnic population.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Paclitaxel/farmacologia , Diálise Renal , Trombose , Enxerto Vascular , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia com Balão/métodos , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacologia , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/métodos , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/instrumentação , Diálise Renal/métodos , Reoperação/métodos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Enxerto Vascular/efeitos adversos , Enxerto Vascular/métodos , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
4.
J Vasc Access ; 24(4): 591-598, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aim of Arch V SUPERA-LUX was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy of SUPERA™ (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) helical stent implantation and Passeo-18 Lux™ (Biotronik Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, Singapore) drug coated balloon (DCB) elution to treat recurrent cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) in the setting of AV access dysfunction. METHODS: Investigator-initiated, single-center, single-arm prospective pilot study of 20 end-stage renal failure Asian patients with a dysfunctional brachiocephalic fistula. All had symptomatic recurrent CAS within 6 months of prior intervention. The lesion was pre-dilated with a standard high-pressure balloon (Biotronik Passeo-35 HP balloon). The DCB (Passeo-18 Lux™) is subsequently inflated and the SUPERA™ stent deployed to sit 2 mm distal to the cephalic arch and covering the CAS but within the DCB zone. All patients were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 months and followed up with Duplex ultrasound at 6- and 12-months. RESULTS: There were 9 (45%) males and mean age was 67 ± 11.0 years. Mean time from prior procedure was 113 ± 68 days and main indication for reintervention was high venous pressure (9/20, 45%). Technical success was 100% and there were no peri-procedural complications related to either stent or DCB deployment. Target lesion primary patency at 6- and 12-months was 10/18 (55%) and 5/16 (31%), respectively. Mean time to target lesion re-intervention was 170 ± 82 days. Circuit access patency was 8/18 (44%) and 2/16 (13%) at 6- and 12-months respectively and mortality was 3/20 (15%) attributed to the patients' underlying co-morbidities. CONCLUSION: Dual prong strategy of using SUPERA™ stenting and Passeo-18 Lux™ drug elution for recurrent CAS, although safe, was no more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty or stenting alone. Development of an intense inflammatory reaction within the stent led to reinterventions of a number of cases with suboptimal results.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Fístula , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos Piloto , Diálise Renal , Resultado do Tratamento , Stents , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Fístula/etiologia , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis
5.
J Vasc Access ; 24(5): 1008-1017, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965764

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aim of this pilot clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR)™ sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) for improving failing arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) patency in Asian haemodialysis patients. METHODS: Prospective single-centre, multi-investigator, non-consecutive, non-blinded single arm trial. Forty end-stage renal failure Asian patients with a dysfunctional AVF underwent SEB angioplasty between May and November 2020. All stenotic lesions were prepared with high pressure non-compliant balloon angioplasty prior to SEB angioplasty. Endpoints of interest included target lesion primary patency and circuit access patency and safety through 30 days. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 month and were followed up with Duplex ultrasound at 6 months. RESULTS: There was one subject dropout so final n = 39 patients (mean age 65.0 ± 11.9; males = 26 (66.7%)) and n = 43 target lesions treated. Main indication for intervention was dropping access flow (24/39; 61.5%) and most common target lesion was in the juxta-anastomosis (24/43; 54.5%). There was 100% technical and procedural success. There were no adverse events related to the SEB. Target lesion primary patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 39/41 (95.1%) and 28/39 (71.8%) respectively. Access circuit patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 35/37 (94.6%) and 22/35 (62.9%) respectively. There were 3 (7.7%) deaths all attributable to patients' underlying co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Fistuloplasty using the novel Selution SLR™ SEB for dysfunctional AVF circuits seems a safe and effective modality in Asian haemodialysis patients at 6 months but larger randomised controlled studies are required now to determine its true efficacy against plain balloon angioplasty.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Fístula Arteriovenosa , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiologia , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Estudos Prospectivos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Sirolimo , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
6.
J Vasc Access ; 24(5): 1032-1041, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965773

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aim was to compare the safety and patency efficacy outcomes between Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB)- versus conventional balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of haemodialysis access-related conduit stenosis. METHODS: Retrospective single-centre, multi-investigator, consecutive, double-arm comparative cohort study. About 130 end-stage renal failure Asian patients with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft underwent PCB or POBA fistuloplasty between November 2018 and June 2020. All stenotic lesions were prepared with high pressure non-compliant balloon angioplasty prior to PCB angioplasty. All patients received at least one antiplatelet agent for 3 months duration post procedure. RESULTS: Mean age was 66.0 ± 10 years and 79/130 (61%) were males. PCB arm (n = 65) versus POBA arm (n = 65). Majority were AVFs circuits (122/130, 94%). Main indication for intervention was dropping access flow (98/130, 76%). About 172 lesions were treated (56% POBA, 44% PCB), and the juxta-anastomosis (JAS) was the main target lesion (87/172, 51%). There were no significant differences in safety outcomes (30-day adverse events, access thrombosis, abandoned AVF and death) between treatment groups. Mean time to target lesion reintervention (TLR) was longer in PCB-treated lesions (7.1 ± 2.7 vs 5.8 ± 3.2 months, p = 0.03), especially amongst recurrent lesions (7.3 ± 2.4 vs 5.7 ± 3.2, p = 0.02). Mean time to circuit reintervention was also longer in PCB-treated circuits (6.9 ± 2.8 vs 5.8 ± 3.7months, p = 0.04). There were 16 deaths (12%), all attributed to patient's underlying comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Fistuloplasty with Ranger™ PCB for failing arteriovenous circuits in end-stage renal failure patients, is a safe and efficacious modality compared to POBA in terms of longer freedom from TLR.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Fístula Arteriovenosa , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Falência Renal Crônica , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Resultado do Tratamento , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiologia , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis
7.
J Vasc Access ; 24(2): 289-299, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34219511

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Selution Sustained Limus Release (SLR)™ sirolimus-coated balloon (M.A. MedAlliance SA, Nyon, Switzerland) for improving the patency of failing arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) in hemodialysis patients. We also present herein a pre-clinical pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of Selution™ to justify its first use in hemodialysis patients for endovascular access salvage. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is an investigator-initiated prospective single-center, non-blinded single-arm trial. Forty patients with clinically significant de novo or recurrent stenoses in a mature AVF circuit will be recruited. All stenotic lesions will be prepared with high pressure non-compliant conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA) prior to deployment of the Sustained-Release Selution™ sirolimus drug-eluting balloon. The primary efficacy endpoint is 6-month target lesion primary patency and the primary safety endpoint is freedom from localized or systemic serious adverse events through 30 days. Secondary endpoints of interest include technical and clinical success rates and circuit access patency at 3 and 6 months. Follow-up will occur for 2 years for those patients whose AVFs remain patent. Pharmacokinetic and histological animal safety studies performed with the Selution™ coating formulation showed prolonged arterial tissue retention of sirolimus with therapeutic levels up to 60 days and non-toxic and rapidly declining blood levels. Histological results in animal models demonstrated safety, freedom from intraluminal thrombus, reduction in restenosis by sirolimus elution compared to CBA, and no evidence of embolic phenomena indicative of adverse particulate effects. DISCUSSION: Long release sirolimus coated balloons may serve as a promising novel alternative therapy to paclitaxel-based technology for treating conduit stenosis secondary to neointimal hyperplasia. Pre-clinical pharmacokinetic and histological animal data are encouraging and provide suggestion of safety and efficacy in this setting. This single-center trial will provide a first step toward demonstration of efficacy and safety of this device for treatment of stenotic fistulas.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Fístula Arteriovenosa , Humanos , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiologia , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Paclitaxel , Estudos Prospectivos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Projetos Piloto
8.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 45(5): 646-653, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35059796

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) followed by paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for recurrent venous lesions in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-arm cohort study of CBA followed by PCB angioplasty for recurrent AVF stenoses between September 2017 and April 2019. In total, 44 participants were recruited. Target lesions were included if they had recurred within 12 months post-angioplasty, were > = 0.5 cm upstream from the arteriovenous anastomosis, and did not involve the central veins. Up to two non-target lesions per circuit/participant with the same definition were allowed. Lesions were considered separate when there was an intervening 2-cm segment of normal vessel. Technical success was defined as complete lesion effacement on angioplasty. End-points of target and circuit patency were evaluated clinically at 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. RESULT: Technical success was 96% (42/44): Two participants were excluded from analysis due to the need for high-pressure balloon angioplasty as the target lesions did not efface with CBA. The median follow-up duration was 337.5 days. Mean stenosis pre- and post-angioplasty was 69.0% (51.6-84.8) and 20.8% (0-44.8), respectively. The target lesion primary, primary assisted and circuit patency for the entire study population (n = 42) were 61.6 ± 7.8%, 92.7 ± 4.0%, and 54.7 ± 7.9%, respectively, at 12 months. For participants without non-target lesions (n = 22), the rates were 77.3 ± 8.9%, 90.9 ± 6.1%, and 60.7 ± 11.0%, respectively, at 12 months. CONCLUSION: CBA followed by PCB angioplasty appears safe and feasible for treatment of recurrent venous lesions in dysfunctional AVFs.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Fístula Arteriovenosa , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Angioplastia com Balão/métodos , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Estudos de Coortes , Constrição Patológica/terapia , Humanos , Paclitaxel , Estudos Prospectivos , Diálise Renal , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
9.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0241321, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33108398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the MagicTouch™ sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) catheter (Concept Medical Inc., Tampa, FL, US) on improving the patency of failing arterio-venous fistulas (AVF) with de novo and recurrent stenoses. MATILDA reports early outcomes at 3- and 6 months post intervention. METHODS: Single-centre, single-arm prospective pilot study of 33 (18 males; mean age 64.7±11.6 years) end-stage renal failure Asian patients with a dysfunctional AVF, who underwent SCB angioplasty between May 2019-January 2020. All procedures were performed under local anaesthetic without sedation and as day surgery. All patients were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 months and followed up with Duplex ultrasound at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: 47 stenotic target lesions treated and 24/33 (72.7%) patients were for restenosis. Main indications for intervention was low/dropping access flow (21/33; 63.6%) and most common target lesion was in the juxta-anastomosis (19/47; 40.4%). There was 100% technical and procedural success. There were no peri-procedural complications related to the SCB. The target lesion primary patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 46/47 (97.9%) and 29/35 (82.9%) respectively. Circuit access patency rates at 3 and 6 months were 31/33 (93.9%) and 17/25 (68%) respectively. There was one (2.9%) death at 6 months and 4/33 (12.1%) overall to date, all from patients' underlying co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: SCB angioplasty for dysfunctional AVF circuits is a safe and efficacious modality in Asian haemodialysis patients at six months comparable if not better than the paclitaxel data reported to date in the literature.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Fístula Arteriovenosa/fisiopatologia , Fístula Arteriovenosa/terapia , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/química , Diálise Renal , Sirolimo/farmacologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA