Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Surg ; 20(1): 252, 2020 Oct 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33109146

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation after hepatectomy creates problems for repeat hepatectomy. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a spray (AdSpray) and sheet adhesion barrier (Seprafilm) in a rat hepatectomy-induced adhesion model. METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent partial resection of the left lateral liver lobe. They were randomly assigned to control (n = 10), AdSpray (n = 10), and Seprafilm groups. Seven days after surgery, the animals were sacrificed, and adhesions at the hepatic resection surface were blindly evaluated. RESULTS: In the control group, adhesions were formed in all 10 animals (100%), with a 69% adhesion extent (mean). In the AdSpray group, the incidence of adhesions (40%) and the adhesion extent (mean, 10%) were significantly lower than in the control group (incidence; p = 0.0147, adhesion extent; p = 0.0007). In the Seprafilm group, the incidence of adhesions was 70%. The adhesion extent of Seprafilm (mean, 30%) was significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.0492). No significant differences were observed between the AdSpray and Seprafilm groups. As for histopathological examination, animals in the AdSpray group showed a similar healing profile to that of the control group without delayed healing and regeneration of mesothelial cells. In contrast, the Seprafilm group showed ongoing foreign body reaction to Seprafilm, and regeneration of mesothelial cells was immature at 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: Both the spray-type gel and sheet adhesion barriers significantly reduced adhesion formation after hepatectomy. The spray-type adhesion barrier caused no adverse events and induced favorable healing. These adhesion barriers may be effective in hepatectomy. Further animal studies and clinical trials are required to determine their benefits in clinical use.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/administração & dosagem , Dextrinas/administração & dosagem , Hepatectomia , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Hidrogéis/administração & dosagem , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Administração Tópica , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/métodos , Masculino , Membranas Artificiais , Curativos Oclusivos , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia
2.
Toxicol Pathol ; 47(3): 408-417, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30282527

RESUMO

Nitinol stents are widely used for the treatment of peripheral arterial diseases in lower extremity arteries and have shown different clinical outcomes depending on implanted arterial segments. We aimed to compare histopathological responses to nitinol stents in femoral artery (FA) with those in femoropopliteal artery (FPA), which is markedly bended during knee flexion. A single nitinol stent was implanted in FA and FPA of 21 domestic swine. The stented vessels were angiographically assessed and then harvested for histopathology at 1 and 3 months after implantation. Angiographic late lumen loss was significantly greater in FPA than in FA at 3 months. Neointimal area decreased in FA and increased in FPA from 1 to 3 months. Compared with FA, peri-strut area of FPA showed more pronounced hemorrhage and fibrin deposition at 1 month and angiogenesis and inflammation at 1 and 3 months. Injury to internal elastic lamina or media was minimal in both FA and FPA at both time points. In conclusion, vascular responses to nitinol stents were different between FA and FPA with respect to time course of neointimal formation and progress of healing, suggesting that repetitive interaction between stent and vessel wall during dynamic vessel motion affected vascular responses.


Assuntos
Ligas/toxicidade , Artéria Femoral/patologia , Artéria Poplítea/patologia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Angiografia , Animais , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Técnicas Histológicas , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Suínos
3.
Toxicol Pathol ; 47(3): 401-407, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30585131

RESUMO

We have developed a new method for obtaining information on whole tissues by light microscopy (LM) and ultrastructural features by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). This method uses serial sections of a stented artery embedded in resin. Stents were implanted in porcine coronary arteries in this study. The heart was perfusion fixed in a 2% paraformaldehyde and 1.25% glutaraldehyde mixed solution. The stented artery was then removed, fixed in 1% osmium, embedded in Quetol 651 resin, and sectioned serially. For LM, the black color of osmium was removed from the section by immersion in periodic acid and hydrogen peroxide after deplasticization. These sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Elastica-Masson trichrome stain. For TEM, thin sections were re-embedded in Quetol 812 resin by the resupinate method and cut into ultrathin sections. A clear, fine structure was obtained, and organelles, microvilli, and cell junctions in the endothelium were easily observed. The combined observation of adjacent specimens by LM and TEM enabled us to relate histopathological changes in the millimeter scale to those in the nanometer scale.


Assuntos
Vasos Coronários/ultraestrutura , Resinas Epóxi/química , Técnicas Histológicas/instrumentação , Técnicas Histológicas/métodos , Metacrilatos/química , Stents/efeitos adversos , Animais , Vasos Coronários/patologia , Microscopia , Microscopia Eletrônica de Transmissão , Microtomia/métodos , Suínos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA